Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 13 Jul 2008 (Sunday) 23:12
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Which umbrella?

 
mindchatter
Senior Member
364 posts
Joined Apr 2008
     
Jul 13, 2008 23:12 |  #1

I already have a 40in. translucent shoot through umbrella. I'm looking to get another now. Should I go with some type of bounce umbrella next? Is there an umbrella that will give better flash coverage for portraits or group shots? I'm using a 430ex with a remote trigger..thanks, Jerry


Canon EOS 40D Gripped
Canon 28-135mm IS lens-Canon 50mm 1.8
Canon 430ex speedlite-Digital Concepts 952AF-
Calumet Genesis 200-Cybersync triggers
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/mindchatter (external link)
http://www.jerrybutzph​otography.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
Jul 13, 2008 23:35 |  #2

We recently had some good discussion about umbrellas and many of use are using and like the Photogenic 60" White Satin Eclipse umbrella. Very nice light, great coverage, pleasing catch light. Can be used as bounce or shoot through. I highly recommend it.


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jul 13, 2008 23:37 |  #3

Westcott seem more Tim-proof than others i've tried. You want all the light you can get with a Speedlite, so get silver, 45-60 inch, the size doesn't matter much.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mindchatter
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
364 posts
Joined Apr 2008
     
Jul 13, 2008 23:43 |  #4

I was just looking around using search... Lets say I'm gonna be shooting kids in a pool.... that just doesn't sound right!.... but it's the truth, Using my 430ex on a wireless trigger, whats the best thing to do? By the way, Should I get a lens filter for a shoot like that? I use a 40D with the kit lens 28-135mm?


Canon EOS 40D Gripped
Canon 28-135mm IS lens-Canon 50mm 1.8
Canon 430ex speedlite-Digital Concepts 952AF-
Calumet Genesis 200-Cybersync triggers
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/mindchatter (external link)
http://www.jerrybutzph​otography.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
Jul 13, 2008 23:47 as a reply to  @ mindchatter's post |  #5

I wouldn't be so quick to go for silver. I understand it's more efficient but it's also more specular and that's not always desirable. It would depend on what application the umbrella would be used to better determine the exact type.

I had a 60" silver and I didn't like it at all. The quality of light and the catch light was much too specular and the silver brought out the ribs and spokes of the umbrella, whereas the white does not, and the design on the Eclipse umbrella (white, not silver) works in that it reduces the definition of the umbrella guts, and the creates a more pleasing and natural looking catch light.


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rudi
Goldmember
Avatar
3,751 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2002
Location: Australia
     
Jul 14, 2008 02:53 |  #6

Everybody, stop talking about the 60" White Photogenic! I don't need one, I don't need one... (there, I think that worked! :D).

Like Tim, I like my Westcott umbrellas. Dunno about "Tim-proof", but I seem to be able to work them right. Unlike Tim I prefer white umbrellas, I get nicer light out of them.


• Wedding Photographer - Sydney and Wollongong (external link)
• Borrowed Moment (blog) (external link)

Life is uncertain. Eat dessert first.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,092 posts
Likes: 48
Joined Dec 2005
     
Jul 14, 2008 02:59 |  #7

This thread is perfect timing for me, as I just used my Vivitar 283s for some wedding granny's group shots (aka boring formals) the other day with dismal results. Of course I had no umbrellas large enough so just bounce off the ceiling & PS'd out the eye shadows.

I'm curious as to whether a little Vivitar 283 (35mm head) can fill a 60" umbrella in the first place.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rudi
Goldmember
Avatar
3,751 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2002
Location: Australia
     
Jul 14, 2008 03:18 |  #8

For my "Strobist" kit, I use Westcott 43" white umbrellas. I use Sunpak 383's but a Vivitar 283 has about the same coverage. A 60" umbrella might be overkill...


• Wedding Photographer - Sydney and Wollongong (external link)
• Borrowed Moment (blog) (external link)

Life is uncertain. Eat dessert first.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,092 posts
Likes: 48
Joined Dec 2005
     
Jul 14, 2008 03:22 |  #9

I don't think a 60" umbrella would be overkill from a coverage-of-subject point of view for wedding formals.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jul 14, 2008 04:11 |  #10

I rarely use umbrellas to light wedding formals, i'm usually outside, with fill flash and no time to set up lighting. To beat the sun i'd need massive studio strobes if I were using umbrellas.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,092 posts
Likes: 48
Joined Dec 2005
     
Jul 14, 2008 04:18 |  #11

Yeah I don't and won't do that shizz outside. But around here, Granny's Groupshots are still desired & church lighting is guaranteed to suck.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jul 14, 2008 04:31 |  #12

I never had to shoot formals in a church - good thing too, to do it properly would probably take two lights on the group and one or two on the background. Actually I had to do it once in a modern church, I got horrible reflections from the solid curved wood background (like a rounded wall behind them).


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,092 posts
Likes: 48
Joined Dec 2005
     
Jul 15, 2008 14:21 |  #13

Consider yourself lucky...

This was actually my first inside-church formal, but it was also only my second local (ie in my own town) wedding. Unfortunately, pretty much all local weddings are like this one. If I don't ever book another one, I'll be fine and won't need umbrellas. If I do though, I'll definitely have to shoot more of this stuff, even though I'd prefer not to.

Either way I do have enough lights to hit the background as well. I wouldn't have needed the extra two at this one since it was well lit on the altar...just not pleasantly so.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark-B
Goldmember
Avatar
2,248 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Louisiana
     
Jul 15, 2008 18:40 |  #14

TMR Design wrote in post #5906263 (external link)
I wouldn't be so quick to go for silver. I understand it's more efficient but it's also more specular and that's not always desirable. It would depend on what application the umbrella would be used to better determine the exact type.

I have a Westcott 45" soft silver umbrella. I've been pleased with the results.
All of these are with a 580EX or 430EX.


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


.

Mark-B
msbphoto.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pcunite
Goldmember
Avatar
1,481 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Apr 2007
     
Jul 15, 2008 19:16 |  #15

I use a 60" umbrella all the time for inside venue work. For formals works very well. The Canon 580EX has plenty of power for f5.6 ISO 400 shooting...

These shots show two 580EX camera left and right firing into a 60" white (not silver) bounce umbrellas. The second shot shows one with a third 580EX firing bare into the ceiling to light up the background. Mix to taste....

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'text/html'
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'text/html'



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,663 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Which umbrella?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2740 guests, 164 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.