yes i have the Sigma MACRO 105mm f/2.8 EX DG, im happy with the resalts its a great lens, i took this picture of a fly, cropped
however i have been toying with the idea of getting in closer to insects, read about tubes and kenko tubes heard theres no real diffrence between the two.
also heard about 2 x convertors, and even reverse lenses.
i dont own any tubes and never tryed them, like the ones on ebay or kenko ones so not sure how these perform,
however i did have a play with my 18-55 lens today reversed on my sigma 105mm and like the closer resalts from it even through quailty was not the best.
being quite close it was hard to get all the subject in focus the av aperture
was set to lowest. overall i liked the closer results it gave. and im not even sure if the the 18-55 canon lens was the ideal lens to use as i just heard about the 50mm, hopefylly someone can put m straightt on that.
however im now wondering if i will be better useing either a reverse lens, a kenko tube the cheaper ebay tubes, now whch one would get me the closest.
defenetly want to get closer shots now i have seen it for my own eyes how closer you can get useing a lens reversed

now which one should i go for which is going to give me the closest pictures, kenko, 2x convertors, cheaper ebay tubes, diopters, or lens.




