Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
Thread started 18 Jul 2008 (Friday) 17:49
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Wedding pictures complaint... first one :/

 
Propi
Member
Avatar
95 posts
Joined Sep 2007
     
Jul 18, 2008 17:49 |  #1

Recently I've sent a complete wedding album to a couple. I was pretty confident, since the pictures were generally OK, some of them I could even call "really good". There were a few minor errors (such as two people dancing with one of them being slightly OOF, or a shot from the church, which I turned into B&W instead of colour), but all in all it was a decent wedding album.

A few days ago the couple sent me an e-mail, saying that they mailed me back 40 (out of 104) pictures that they demanded "being re-done". It hit me as a suprise, since I wasn't feeling unsure of the album. Today I finally got the package, with each photo wrapped into a page, describing errors and suggestions for correction. I was feeling a little bummed, since most of the comments were purely taste-based or even spiteful. Some examples:

- I know you are using Photoshop, and you could retouch the teeth on this photo. Why didn't you do it the first time? (about a portrait of a person with brownish teeth)
- The grain on this photo is terrible, like from a cheap, 2mpix camera! (about a picture of a guest, from the church, with artificial grain added in postproduction, not a result of high-ISO)
- This picture is too dark/not lit properly (about photos that were properly exposed, the foreground being lit slightly better than the background)
- This photo looks like it was taken at a funeral! Our friend, a professional photographer told us, that you can't make B&W pictures of old people! (about a pic of the elder family, sitting in the church. The photo was indeed B&W)
- The hand on this picture is moving! (about a picture where the Groom is embracing his relative, where his hand is indeed slightly moved - the rest is in focus)

I might add, that the couple already received all the pictures in digital form. Now they demand all of them being re-done, the quality upgraded ("I want a version of this picture that was taken with a flash!"), the sharpness improved + they want additional pictures, that didn't make it to the album.

The main reason for this complaint is, I think, the fact that our cameraman (we form a duo and serve weddings as a photo- and videographer) didn't give the full, unedited video to the couple. Their mother DEMANDED it at the wedding party (saying she wanted to create her own version of the video), while being a little drunk, and generally used very harsh words. She suggested we didn't want to give out the unedited material, because we recorded ourselves cursing and laughing at the guests... We politely said no and continued to film/shoot for the rest of the night (even staying 2hrs longer, than we usually do). After a week we've got an email from the couple, requesting (this time, politely) the video be handed to them. Again, we declined, and the conversation ended. We've sent the finished video and pictures, and the outcome was as described above.

Bottom line is (sorry for a lenghty post, I'm just still shaken by the whole thing) this - I've made a good album, with only a few pictures that I honestly screwed up (say, 5 or 7 out of a hundred). The only reason for the whole complaint, I think, is the fact that we didn't give away the unedited video. I never got any returns from my customers and the couples were always happy, even when they received worse pictures than those mentioned above. Only once the couple wanted some more photos of a relative, that I've omitted in my reportage - no returns whatsoever.

The big question is - how should I respond to this claim? Should I pretend to feel guilty and correct the pictures I consider good enough? Or should I listen to my inner feeling and just ignore the complaints I think are malicious? I never wished any wrong to any client and I want to play this safe, no fighting even if the Couple isn't polite. What are your thoughts?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gooble
Goldmember
Avatar
3,149 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Mesa,AZ
     
Jul 18, 2008 17:58 |  #2

I'm no wedding photographer but what did your contract lay out?

Did you show them former work and exhibit it as what they could expect and did you deliver on that?

If so did your contract stipulate that there would be additional charges for any work above and beyond what was promised and delivered?

Like I said I'm no expert but those are questions that come to mind.

If your contract had the things I mentioned and you delivered what they were entitled to then you can tell them you'll do whatever they want for $60/hour lab work and the additonal cost of prints etc.

If they're not happy with that what else can you do?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,473 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4577
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Jul 18, 2008 18:04 |  #3

If you wish to stay in business, and you want to get a not-negative referral from the customer, you try to increase their satisfaction and willingness to 'work with them'. Or are you willing to burn bridges?! Work with them...within reason, of course!


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Colorblinded
Goldmember
Avatar
2,713 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 725
Joined Jul 2007
     
Jul 18, 2008 18:08 |  #4

Boy that's got to be tough. You want happy customers because I imagine bad word of mouth would kill your business. I hope you can find a solution that makes you and them happy.

Chalk that up as another of many reasons I'd never want to shoot weddings!


http://www.colorblinde​dphoto.com (external link)
http://www.thecolorbli​ndphotographer.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
basroil
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,015 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: STL/Clayton, MO| NJ
     
Jul 18, 2008 18:10 |  #5

For the video, if it doesn't affect you to give out the unedited version (as in all her comments are false), you can offer a personal use editing license and unedited video for xxxxx dollars. Likely your contract states that you will provide the finalized video, if not, you will need to readjust that contract for future weddings.

For the photographs, explain to her (kindly) that you made creative choices that come from xx years of experience. You're the photographer, they are just people that read something somewhere but have no real experience. Also explain to her that individual retouching will be extra and must be accompanied by specific fixes they want. If you think it may affect the business, you can offer a discount on additional services (lets say you give them something of equal value for those 5 shots you messed up).

And regardless of the outcome, time to re-check your contracts to strengthen them against this type of situation.


I don't hate macs or OSX, I hate people and statements that portray them as better than anything else. Macs are A solution, not THE solution. Get a good desktop i7 with Windows 7 and come tell me that sucks for photo or video editing.
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tixeon
Goldmember
Avatar
1,251 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 15
Joined Oct 2004
Location: 44644
     
Jul 18, 2008 18:56 |  #6

My experience (over 1100 weddings) tells me that, no matter what you do & what your contract says, you'll have a tough time pleasing these people. I can only hope that your contract (Agreement form) has you covered on all issues here. You can try to have a sit down face to face talk with them & try to figure out what is really going on. You might be surprised.


Tim
______
Any cat owner will tell you -- no one really owns a cat...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DigitalSpecialist
Goldmember
Avatar
2,286 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2008
Location: Finding a New World, thru my camera
     
Jul 18, 2008 19:06 |  #7

Your in a tough place, do the best you can!


JIM
EOS 630, 1N, 1DsMkII, and 5D/wgrip and some L glass.....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mario.
Senior Member
Avatar
624 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Lone Tree, Colorado
     
Jul 18, 2008 19:13 |  #8

It sounds like you don't offer bound albums... and this might be a good time to start doing so. I have my clients sign off on the album pages proof saying that they are pleased and content with the quality and layout of the photos. It keeps both of us happy as they can bring up any potential problems with me before I spend money and time getting prints. Best of luck!~


Mario M. | Black Macbook 2.4/ 4GB | 40D | 350D| 17-40 f/4L | 70-200 f/4L | 580EX | 430EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aram535
Goldmember
Avatar
1,915 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
     
Jul 18, 2008 20:15 |  #9

Tixeon wrote in post #5938599 (external link)
My experience (over 1100 weddings) tells me that, no matter what you do & what your contract says, you'll have a tough time pleasing these people. I can only hope that your contract (Agreement form) has you covered on all issues here. You can try to have a sit down face to face talk with them & try to figure out what is really going on. You might be surprised.

I sometimes do believe that some people can never be pleased and no matter how hard you try you will get a negative or no recommendation from them. You can usually pick these people out from the types of comments they make.

I am not a wedding photographer so I don't get this as much, but I will try to work with customer as much as possible, even beyond normal if they are civil and tell me the issue with courtesy. These are usually the best customers and referrals as they will not only tell others I did a good job, but that I worked with them to make sure it was a successful job.

This is I believe one of first types of situations. No matter what you're going to get a negative. Just do the minimum, cut them a deal and give them reduced files, let them go on their way.


Gear List * www.tranquilphotos.com (external link) * My Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
madhatter04
Goldmember
1,930 posts
Likes: 52
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Southern California
     
Jul 18, 2008 22:34 |  #10

Agreed. If you talk to them and are willing to work with them, your business will stay afloat. Also remember that if you talk to them in person or over the phone, they won't be nearly as 'tough' as they are in email/written form! ;) I've learned that while aiding a friend with a photography issue. They're all big and bad about it when they're not directly speaking to you ;)


Designer // Art Director // Photographer
www.alexanderfitch.com (external link) | AlexFitchPhoto on Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Propi
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
95 posts
Joined Sep 2007
     
Jul 19, 2008 02:17 |  #11

Thanks for your answers, they really opened my mind to a few things...

To answer some of the issues brought up - my contract (agreement) states that all creative decisions are made entirely by me, so I'm the one to blame. I honestly think if I'd redo every photo that the customer wanted to be redone, I'd still be retouching my first wedding ;) But as I said earlier - this is the first time that even a single photo was sent back to me.

As for the video - we offered a buying option for the unedited material. The couple refused to pay for anything other than the DVD disc it was recorded on.

And yes - I showed the couple my previous work. Problem is - the pictures I showed earlier were arguably worse than my current work. I've gained experience and gear, so the photos I took at their wedding were of course better than those, which served as a "demo".

As some of you said earlier - there is nothing I can do here, that would make them refer me to other clients. That's what bugs me... :/




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lightchaser
Senior Member
Avatar
394 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: BOP, New Zealand - Land of the Long White Cloud
     
Jul 19, 2008 03:51 |  #12

Heck. I wonder if their friend "the professional photographer" might possibly have wound them up - trying to show off by pointing out all the things he/she thought were wrong with your work??

I think if I were in this position I'd make a time to go and meet with them face to face and nut it out. Like madhatter said - they might be quite a bit more reasonable in person. Good luck!


1DMkIII, 40D, 580EXII, 70-200f 2.8L, 24-70 2.8L, 50mm 1.8 and f2.5 macro, 10-22mm.
"We see what we know 'till we know who we are. Then we see what we feel." Ernst Haas

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lonnie
Goldmember
Avatar
1,606 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Southern Louisiana
     
Jul 19, 2008 04:16 |  #13

I'm a little curious. Could you possibly post the photos?


My YouTube Vlog: https://www.youtube.co​m/c/GarageFlips (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
greyswan
I have just suddenly realised just how deranged I am
Avatar
1,645 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Likes: 919
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Ontario Canada
     
Jul 19, 2008 05:55 |  #14

re giving out unedited material: I would, as a graphic designer, consider this to be similar to giving out my native files... not to be done at all, in my opinion. And putting an unedited video in the hands of an amateur to hash up would do more damage to your rep than refusing the request. I'd explain that they are paying only for 'finished' files - the rest belong to you, unless they are willing to pay the hefty price for a full copyright buyout. This is kind of like buying a car and expecting the complete factory 'build' plans to be thrown in in case you want to build your own car, lol.

I definitely word my contracts as to what the customer is entitled.

Cheers, Chris.


Chris
A clean house is a sign that my computer's broken...
gallery:https://ephemerastudio​.smugmug.com/ (external link)
Gear: 50D, 300 f4L, 70-200 f4L, 100 1.28 Macro, nifty fifty.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TTk
Goldmember
Avatar
2,518 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Langtoft. England.
     
Jul 19, 2008 06:09 |  #15

I agree with Tixeon thay won't be happy, I think the so called Pro Photographer friend are pulling there strings and this will carry on and on. In the end thay will be asking for a refund, good luck.


Terry.:cool:
http://www.terrykirton.co/ (external link)
http://www.ttkphotogra​phy.com/ (external link)
http://www.langtoftpho​tography.com/ (external link)

 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,364 views & 0 likes for this thread, 22 members have posted to it.
Wedding pictures complaint... first one :/
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1693 guests, 103 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.