Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 18 Jul 2008 (Friday) 23:34
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Sorry, Another Which "Travel Tripod Under $100" ??

 
Beski
Senior Member
Avatar
442 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Andover, New Jersey
     
Jul 18, 2008 23:34 |  #1

Sorry, I need some Tripod Help !! :oops: :oops: :oops:

I am getting ready for a trip to Hawaii this September, and I was looking for a Small & Lightweight Tripod. I recently got the Manfrotto 055XPROB Tripod & 488RC2 Ballhead but have only had the chance to use it a few times. I was going to take this tripod set up, but then decided it was a little big, heavy and expensive to pack in a suitcase and drag through the sand, so I thought a smaller, lighter tripod in the $100 range would work out better.

I also figured since it was a "cheaper" tripod, it may be better to get a 3-way pan/tilt head rather then a ball head figuring the ball head may be weaker on a cheaper model.

I only need this tripod to hold a 40D and a 24-105 -or- 10-22

---------------

Does it make sense to just get the Manfrotto or is the Slik or Velbon a better choice?

Is there another tripod I should consider in this range ?

Is the LACK of Independent Leg Spread a Bad Thing on the Velbon ?

---------------

OK....Here are my choices so far:

$95 Manfrotto 718B Digi Tripod (Black) with 3-Way Pan/Tilt Head & Quick Release With CASE
http://www.bhphotovide​o.com/c/product/303600​-REG/Bogen_Manfrotto_71​8B_718B_Digi_Tripod_wi​th.html (external link)

Maximum Height: 65.5" (166.3 cm)
Maximum Height w/o Column Extended :54" (137 cm)
Folded Length: 19.3" (49 cm)
Load Capacity: 5.5 lb (2.5 kg)
Leg Sections: 4
Leg Lock Type: Flip-levers
Head Type: 3-Way pan & tilt with quick release
Weight: 3.1 lb (1.4

$90 Velbon MAXi 347GB 4-Section Trunnion Shaft Tripod with 3-Way with Tilt Head & Quick Release With CASE
http://www.bhphotovide​o.com/c/product/251825​-REG/Velbon_MAXI347GB_M​AXi_347GB_Trunnion_Sha​ft.html (external link)

Maximum Height: 62.2" (158.0 cm)
Maximum Height w/o Column Extended: 49.8" (126.4 cm)
Folded Length: 16.8" (42.7 cm)
Load Capacity: 4.5 lb (2 kg)
Leg Sections: 4
Leg Lock Type: Flip levers
Independent Leg Spread: No
Head Type: 3-Way pan/tilt with quick release
Weight: 2.65 lb (1.20

[COLOR=blue]$90 Slik Pro 330DX Tripod (Black) with 3-Way Pan/Tilt Head (Quick Release)
http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …DX_Tripod_with_​3_Way.html (external link)

Maximum Height: 63"
Folded Length: 23.6"
Load Capacity: 6.63 lb
Leg Sections: 3
Leg Lock Type: Flip Lock
Independent Leg Spread: Yes
Head Type: 3-Way panhead with quick release
Weight: 3.31 lb



OR, do I spend an extra $30 and go with the Manfrotto 728B:
http://www.bhphotovide​o.com/c/product/283759​-REG/Bogen_Manfrotto_72​8B_728B_Digi_Tripod_wi​th.html (external link)

Thanks in advance for your help !!
Tom
:lol:


1D Mark III | 40D | Rebel 300D
100-400L | 300 4L | 70-200 4L IS | 24-105L [COLOR=#800080]| 17-40L| 100 Macro | 10-22 | 85 1.8 | 50 1.8 II | 580EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sgogula
Senior Member
786 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
     
Jul 20, 2008 17:18 |  #2

I don't know if this is good: Monfrotto 190XB with 484RC2 for $129 (external link)


Canon 5D III | Canon 24-70 L II | Canon 50D | Canon 70-200 2.8 L IS II | Sigma 17-50 OS | Canon 50mm f1.8 II | 580,430 EX II Speedlite

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Beski
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
442 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Andover, New Jersey
     
Jul 20, 2008 22:25 as a reply to  @ sgogula's post |  #3

sgogula,

As far as best value, that looks like a great deal with the rebate, but I am thinking that the folded length and weight are getting too close to my current Manfrotto 055XPROB Tripod & 488RC2 Ballhead.

That's why I was looking for something shorter and lighter. I know if I carry a long, heavy tripod & head on my trip, I will just leave it in the room, but if I have something smaller, I would be more likely to take it with me and use it.

Plus I make my wife the "pack donkey" and she gets to carry the camera equipment and tripod while I carry the MAP, so if I make things easy on her during the day....she will make things easy on me at night !!! :oops: :lol:


1D Mark III | 40D | Rebel 300D
100-400L | 300 4L | 70-200 4L IS | 24-105L [COLOR=#800080]| 17-40L| 100 Macro | 10-22 | 85 1.8 | 50 1.8 II | 580EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Jul 21, 2008 08:33 |  #4

If you are looking smaller and lighter, yet not more then $100,- you are going to compromise stability.

That being said: It might be worthwhile to have a look at the Gitzo knockoffs, like Amvona. Another option would be an even smaller Manfrotto. Don't expect miracles however ;)


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Beski
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
442 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Andover, New Jersey
     
Jul 21, 2008 13:03 |  #5

Thanks for the help René !

René Damkot wrote in post #5953010 (external link)
If you are looking smaller and lighter, yet not more then $100,- you are going to compromise stability.

I understand that, I realize I will have to compramise stability in order to get smaller and lighter for that price. As this point I am considering this a "Disposable" Tripod for this one trip, if it doesn't fit on the way home, I will just leave it in the room !!

René Damkot wrote in post #5953010 (external link)
That being said: It might be worthwhile to have a look at the Gitzo knockoffs, like Amvona.

Just checked a few Amvona on E-bay, but they seem very heavy. (8.1 lbs. for the $109 model:
http://cgi.ebay.com …ZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcm​dZViewItem (external link)

René Damkot wrote in post #5953010 (external link)
Another option would be an even smaller Manfrotto. Don't expect miracles however ;)

Do you mean even Smaller then the Manfrotto I have listed in my first post above?? $95 Manfrotto 718B Digi Tripod (Black) with 3-Way Pan/Tilt Head & Quick Release With CASE I thought this $95 unit would be a nice compromise ?

I figured a cheaper tripod would still have to be better then trying "Hand Held" especially to capture a Sunset, or the water motion on a Waterfall. Not expecting miracles, just something better then nothing.

*** Any thoughts on getting a 3-Way Pan/Tilt VS. a Ball Head at this price point ??

Thanks again,
Tom


1D Mark III | 40D | Rebel 300D
100-400L | 300 4L | 70-200 4L IS | 24-105L [COLOR=#800080]| 17-40L| 100 Macro | 10-22 | 85 1.8 | 50 1.8 II | 580EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bryman
Member
Avatar
243 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
     
Jul 21, 2008 13:22 |  #6

it's a bit out of your price range ($25) but this is what I have and I'm very happy with it:

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=517838




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cruzyn56
Member
Avatar
229 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: New Jersey
     
Jul 21, 2008 13:46 |  #7

I picked up a Slik Pro340DX, because it would fit in the saddlebag of my motorcycle. It doesn't have the range or stability of my Manfrotto, but it is much lighter and fits where I want it. I used a cheap Vivitar on a trip last year, that I bought years ago from Wall Mart, that had a 3 way pan/tilt head and was more frustrated by that than anything else. I like the ball heads much better, easier to adjust your shot.

Another thing you might consider is not packing it for the trip to Hawaii, but to buy a cheap one at Wall Mart when you get there, then leave it behind when you are finished with it. There are always trade offs when looking for light weight and something to fit in luggage, etc.


Greg -- 20D, some lenses, underwater stuff, '01 Roadking, '76 Superglide

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FLiPMaRC
Senior Member
Avatar
967 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2006
Location: NJ
     
Jul 21, 2008 14:12 |  #8

How about a Carbon Fiber Tripod off eBay (no name): http://cgi.ebay.com …ZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcm​dZViewItem (external link)

Of course, you will need to adjust your budget to get a ballhead.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gembobs
Member
215 posts
Likes: 6
Joined May 2008
Location: UK
     
Jul 21, 2008 17:32 |  #9

Beski wrote in post #5950521 (external link)
sgogula,

As far as best value, that looks like a great deal with the rebate, but I am thinking that the folded length and weight are getting too close to my current Manfrotto 055XPROB Tripod & 488RC2 Ballhead.

I have a 190 XPROB with 486RC2 ballhead and packed it into my suitcase to go to Venice with and carried it around all day without any problems at all. I have attached my old camera strap to it as a shoulder strap and to be honest, the only time I knew I had it over my shoulder was when I was packed into a water bus, and was wary of hitting people with it (though that had its benefits too! :lol:) To give you an idea of how strong I am (or not!), I find the 70-200 F2.8 IS L heavy to hold.

As you say, it isn't that much different in weight to what you already have, if space in the suitcase is an issue, take the head off and attach it again when you unpack. Why waste $100 on a cheap tripod when you already own one that will do the job better?


Gear List
My Smugmug (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JC4
Goldmember
Avatar
2,610 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Columbus, Ohio
     
Jul 21, 2008 17:58 |  #10

cruzyn56 wrote in post #5954843 (external link)
I picked up a Slik Pro340DX, because it would fit in the saddlebag of my motorcycle.

I have a 340dx also. Its not bad. Don't extend the center column, and if possible not the last set of legs, and its pretty solid. I wouldn't use it for longer lenses, > 135mm, but for landscapes it'll do well. It's $100, small, and light. I haven't disposed of mine yet, and its been upgraded with a Gitzo/Markins setup.


John Caputo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
brecklundin
Goldmember
Avatar
2,179 posts
Joined Jun 2008
     
Jul 21, 2008 19:01 |  #11

Would a monopod do instead? I grabbed a nice carbon fiber monopod on Amazon for about $70 shipped overnight and added a tilt & swivel 3229 Bogen head for another $43 w/shipping. The whole thing collapses down to about 18" or so...I use it a lot more than I would a tripod. But if taking really long exposures I would think ya need a tripod.

Or will there be shots you want to be in so you'll use a remote or self-timer? My only question is do you want to walk away from a marginally stable tripod with your rig on top? but I suppose that is the original question right? ;)

OOPS-EDIT: I paid about $90 + $4 for overnight because it was the only monopod I could get from Amazon overnight...still aside from it being a twist-lock I really like it and it feel super stable. PLUS it is about 25" with the head attached and just under 23" w/o head...I dunno where I got the 18" lenght...early onset CRS I suppose ???

http://www.amazon.com/​gp/product/B000YH49OC (external link)


Real men shoot Pentax because we're born with our own Canon's!!
{Ok...ok, some of use just have a PnS but it it always makes me happy! :D}
Pentax K5, K20D, Three Amigos (Pentax FA 31/1.8 Limited Silver, Pentax FA 43/1.9 Limited Silver, Pentax FA 77/1.8 Limited Silver), Pentax DA 35mm F2.8 Macro Limited, Sigma 24-60/2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jeromego
Goldmember
Avatar
3,907 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Florida
     
Jul 22, 2008 12:02 |  #12

sgogula wrote in post #5948943 (external link)
I don't know if this is good: Monfrotto 190XB with 484RC2 for $129 (external link)

Im just wondering, would this setup be able to support a 70-200 2.8L and an xsi with bge5 bat grip. im looking at buying a tripod and was thinking about getting the 190xprob and the 486rc2, but this one caught my attention with a cheaper price.


Jerome
Gear List
Canon CPS Member
www.lightsandimages.co​m (external link)
facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Beski
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
442 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Andover, New Jersey
     
Aug 06, 2008 08:53 as a reply to  @ jeromego's post |  #13

I just wanted to follow up on my original post so I can get something ordered soon.

I have read all the replies along with many other threads, and I understand that I am sacrificing quality to get a low end tripod, but as I mentioned this is really a 1 trip tripod and would consider leaving it at the hotel if I don't have room to bring it back home !! It will only have to hold my 40D and 24-105 or 10-22 for a few sunset and waterfall pictures.

Keep in mind I already have the Manfrotto 055XPROB Tripod & 488RC2 Ballhead but I think it's just to big and heavy to pack take....I just want something to be better then nothing!!

So with my $100 estimated price point, what are your thoughts on getting a 3-Way Pan/Tilt VS. a Ball Head ??

Would a cheaper Pan/Tilt head perhaps be "stronger" then a cheaper ball head ??

Thanks,
Tom


1D Mark III | 40D | Rebel 300D
100-400L | 300 4L | 70-200 4L IS | 24-105L [COLOR=#800080]| 17-40L| 100 Macro | 10-22 | 85 1.8 | 50 1.8 II | 580EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Aug 06, 2008 09:02 |  #14

I prefer the handling of a ball head over a 3 way head.
Also, a 3 way has protruding handles, that can catch on stuff during transportation.


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ben_r_
-POTN's Three legged Support-
Avatar
15,894 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Aug 06, 2008 09:10 |  #15

René Damkot wrote in post #6056849 (external link)
I prefer the handling of a ball head over a 3 way head.
Also, a 3 way has protruding handles, that can catch on stuff during transportation.

And boy do they ever! I swear when I was using a three way head I couldnt get the thing back in the bag without those handles giving me problems! That being said though, I do kind of enjoy the individual axis control of a three way head for portraiture work.


[Gear List | Flickr (external link) | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection (external link) /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,420 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
Sorry, Another Which "Travel Tripod Under $100" ??
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2851 guests, 164 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.