Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
Thread started 19 Jul 2008 (Saturday) 11:35
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Images of people on Stock Photo sites

 
Pete ­ W
Goldmember
Avatar
1,266 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 79
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Bishops Stortford, Herts. UK
     
Jul 19, 2008 11:35 |  #1

Hi all can you help.

A friend has started up a Stock Photo site and I posed the question about images of people in public and whether or not they can be used on a stock site without a model release..... His current stance is all images where you can see the persons face require a model release..... Is this right???


Stock photo site = http://photostore.snap​t.org (external link)


All the best
Pete Woods LRPS
My Gear List
My Websiteexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Pete
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
38,607 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2006
     
Jul 19, 2008 11:37 |  #2

As far as I'm aware (and I could be wrong here), if you take a photo of someone with the intent of making money out of that photo, you need a model release.

The same goes for some buildings as well.


Pete
UK SE Catch of the Day

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheHoff
Don't Hassle....
Avatar
8,804 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Jul 19, 2008 11:43 |  #3

It varies by country but in most cases, yes, you definitely need a release. I can't think of a country where you don't but of course different laws and penalties would apply. You do not need a release if the photo is displayed as art or depicts a newsworthy event and you do not editorialize or imply that the person endorses a product or idea. Stock photography is usually sold so that the person will appear to endorse a product or idea, hence the need for a release.


••Vancouver Wedding Photographer  (external link)••| [gear list] | Latest blog: 5 steps to stopping image loss (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
basroil
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,015 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2006
Location: STL/Clayton, MO| NJ
     
Jul 19, 2008 12:09 |  #4

Pete W wrote in post #5941939 (external link)
Hi all can you help.

A friend has started up a Stock Photo site and I posed the question about images of people in public and whether or not they can be used on a stock site without a model release..... His current stance is all images where you can see the persons face require a model release..... Is this right???


Stock photo site = http://photostore.snap​t.org (external link)

Looks like a really bad microstock agency to me.... If you are going through the trouble of getting releases, then at least go with a better service.


I don't hate macs or OSX, I hate people and statements that portray them as better than anything else. Macs are A solution, not THE solution. Get a good desktop i7 with Windows 7 and come tell me that sucks for photo or video editing.
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pete ­ W
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,266 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 79
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Bishops Stortford, Herts. UK
     
Jul 19, 2008 12:15 |  #5

basroil wrote in post #5942123 (external link)
Looks like a really bad microstock agency to me.... If you are going through the trouble of getting releases, then at least go with a better service.

This is a new site I was just asking the question here as the owner said you would need a model release, it was I that was questioning their policy, which looks to be correct...

How can you tell it is bad, the site has only been up a week... no cost to join and the commission is 30%, seems OK to me

I am happy to see where this site goes :)


All the best
Pete Woods LRPS
My Gear List
My Websiteexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
madhatter04
Goldmember
1,928 posts
Likes: 42
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Southern California
     
Jul 19, 2008 13:08 |  #6

Alamy requires a model release and property release when you use ANY likeliness of a person, including certain body parts, silhouttes, etc.


www.alexanderfitch.com (external link) | AlexFitchDesign on Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
basroil
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,015 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2006
Location: STL/Clayton, MO| NJ
     
Jul 19, 2008 13:34 |  #7

Pete W wrote in post #5942161 (external link)
This is a new site I was just asking the question here as the owner said you would need a model release, it was I that was questioning their policy, which looks to be correct...

How can you tell it is bad, the site has only been up a week... no cost to join and the commission is 30%, seems OK to me

I am happy to see where this site goes :)

Most agencies are free to join and just have a portfolio process to go through. The main reason it is a bad site though isn't because it's microstock or there are webpage problems (which both are true), but because it's an unknown, has almost no photos, and the license terms are bad at best. The entire point of a stock agency is that your photos don't sit there doing nothing, rather you're actually having people look at the photos.

Also, microstock is a horrible idea for any halfway decent photographer, as you can make 100 to 1000 times as much money with a good photo.

Since you are required to have a model release, you might as well go with a real stock agency where you know that the terms of use are better. Model releases are needed for any person that is identifiable, unless used strictly for editorial purposes about that individual. Property releases are needed for anything that is privately owned and is identifiable, when taken on private property. There are exceptions for and against a release when property is involved, so check all local, state, and federal laws for conflicts and exceptions.


I don't hate macs or OSX, I hate people and statements that portray them as better than anything else. Macs are A solution, not THE solution. Get a good desktop i7 with Windows 7 and come tell me that sucks for photo or video editing.
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pete ­ W
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,266 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 79
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Bishops Stortford, Herts. UK
     
Jul 19, 2008 13:54 |  #8

basroil wrote in post #5942543 (external link)
Most agencies are free to join and just have a portfolio process to go through. The main reason it is a bad site though isn't because it's microstock or there are webpage problems (which both are true), but because it's an unknown, has almost no photos, and the license terms are bad at best. The entire point of a stock agency is that your photos don't sit there doing nothing, rather you're actually having people look at the photos.

Also, microstock is a horrible idea for any halfway decent photographer, as you can make 100 to 1000 times as much money with a good photo.

Since you are required to have a model release, you might as well go with a real stock agency where you know that the terms of use are better. Model releases are needed for any person that is identifiable, unless used strictly for editorial purposes about that individual. Property releases are needed for anything that is privately owned and is identifiable, when taken on private property. There are exceptions for and against a release when property is involved, so check all local, state, and federal laws for conflicts and exceptions.

Thanks for the info :)


All the best
Pete Woods LRPS
My Gear List
My Websiteexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

1,310 views & 0 likes for this thread
Images of people on Stock Photo sites
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is erikgrobberts
801 guests, 285 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.