Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 20 Jul 2008 (Sunday) 10:47
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Sekonic L358 Overexposing?

 
doidinho
Goldmember
Avatar
3,352 posts
Likes: 23
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Kenmore, Washington
     
Jul 20, 2008 10:47 |  #1

I picked up this baby last week and have only used it a couple times, but it seems to be giving me readings that lead me to overexpose my shots. I read somewhere that it should give reading equall to the Sunny 16 rule, so since yesterday was a clear sunny day I tested it, and it was spot on. Later that day I went out ot take some shots with strobes and it overexposed by about a stop. This is probally operator error; does anyone know what the problem could be?


Robert McCadden
My Flickr (external link)
MM (external link)
5DMKII, Rebel xti, 24-105 f/4L, Canon 70-200 f/4L, Canon 17-40.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Jul 20, 2008 10:49 |  #2

How are you setting up the camera?

How are you using the meter?


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
doidinho
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,352 posts
Likes: 23
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Kenmore, Washington
     
Jul 20, 2008 11:19 as a reply to  @ SkipD's post |  #3

One flash camera right a 45 degrees to model w/ umbrella. One flash 180 degrees form the first flash. I metered at the models left cheek (closest to key light) w/ lumisphere pointed towads the camera. The meter was on T and set at 1/200; I shot at the aperture the meter gave me, f/4.5.

Here is how it turned out, I dialed down the exposure 0.29 in Lightroom.

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=539517


Robert McCadden
My Flickr (external link)
MM (external link)
5DMKII, Rebel xti, 24-105 f/4L, Canon 70-200 f/4L, Canon 17-40.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Jul 20, 2008 11:35 |  #4

How was the camera set up? What mode, what settings?

Was the ISO setting the same on the camera and the meter?

Did you do anything specific to match up the exposure for the background and the model? Mixing daylight with flash isn't something that everybody gets right at first.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rudi
Goldmember
Avatar
3,751 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2002
Location: Australia
     
Jul 20, 2008 11:43 |  #5

OK, so you had to turn it down a third of a stop, correct? Assuming that you read the meter correctly (it's easy to forget that it also displays tenths of a stop after the aperture reading in some modes), then your camera and your meter disagree by one third of a stop. If you shoot with Canon, there's your answer - they tend to be more sensitive (higher ISO) than their display would indicate, but roughly a third of a stop, funnily enough. :D Even if you don't shoot with Canon, each camera can be slightly off (even the meter might be slightly off), and it's not a big deal to calibrate the two of them so they work well together.


• Wedding Photographer - Sydney and Wollongong (external link)
• Borrowed Moment (blog) (external link)

Life is uncertain. Eat dessert first.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
doidinho
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,352 posts
Likes: 23
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Kenmore, Washington
     
Jul 20, 2008 11:49 |  #6

SkipD wrote in post #5947362 (external link)
How was the camera set up? What mode, what settings?

Was the ISO setting the same on the camera and the meter?

Did you do anything specific to match up the exposure for the background and the model? Mixing daylight with flash isn't something that everybody gets right at first.

ISO on camera matched that of the meter. As far as the mixing goes I was under the imptression that the Sekonic L358 took the ambient light into account even when metering the flash.

Rudi wrote in post #5947389 (external link)
OK, so you had to turn it down a third of a stop, correct? Assuming that you read the meter correctly (it's easy to forget that it also displays tenths of a stop after the aperture reading in some modes), then your camera and your meter disagree by one third of a stop. If you shoot with Canon, there's your answer - they tend to be more sensitive (higher ISO) than their display would indicate, but roughly a third of a stop, funnily enough. :D Even if you don't shoot with Canon, each camera can be slightly off (even the meter might be slightly off), and it's not a big deal to calibrate the two of them so they work well together.

Well, this would explain it. I think I will do acouple more shots before calibrating to make sure I'm getting consistantly overexposed shots.

As far as calibration goes, is this done by using the exposure compensation feature on the meter or is there a better way to do this?


Robert McCadden
My Flickr (external link)
MM (external link)
5DMKII, Rebel xti, 24-105 f/4L, Canon 70-200 f/4L, Canon 17-40.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Jul 20, 2008 11:50 |  #7

Dome in or out?
How did you "aim" the meter?

Image looks good.


edit: If by "exposure compensation feature" you mean: "Hold in both ISO 1 and ISO 2 simultaneously and turn the JOG WHEEL to exposure compensation needed", that's what I'd do if you only use it for one camera.
Otherwise I'd just set ISO 1/3 stop higher on the Sekonic for that camera.


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
doidinho
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,352 posts
Likes: 23
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Kenmore, Washington
     
Jul 20, 2008 11:55 |  #8

René Damkot wrote in post #5947413 (external link)
Dome in or out?
How did you "aim" the meter?

Image looks good.

Dome out and pointed toward the camera. The image looks good now, but I dialed down the exposure by 0.29 in Lightroom.


Robert McCadden
My Flickr (external link)
MM (external link)
5DMKII, Rebel xti, 24-105 f/4L, Canon 70-200 f/4L, Canon 17-40.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Jul 20, 2008 12:45 |  #9

Try aiming the meter halfway between subject and camera.
For flat subjects (repro work), retract dome, and meter parallel to subject.


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
Jul 20, 2008 14:05 as a reply to  @ René Damkot's post |  #10

The Sekonic light meter will show you the proportion of flash to ambient light.

Rarely does a light meter match your camera so there is usually a need for calibration or simply determining the offset and making sure you apply it to the meter's reading, but since the meter has the ability to make that adjustment by dialing in that offset then you at least know the meter is calibrated to your camera. Remember, this is only your camera and if you start shooting with another make or model you may have to determine the appropriate offset for that camera.

The process of calibration can be simplified down to this:

Shoot a gray card that you know is 18% gray. Bring that image up on your computer and look at the histogram. Since you were shooting a gray card with nothing else in the frame you should only see a single spike right around the center of the histogram.
If the spike is to the right of center then you know your meter is giving you readings that are a little too hot. If to the left of center then you know your reading a little under.

If you have a RAW editor that tells you how much you are changing exposure then adjust exposure until the spike is dead center. Note the amount you moved it. If you adjusted by +.3 (1/3 stop) then you now have the offset to dial in to the meter. It's important to remember that if you need +.3 on a Sekonic L-358 you must enter it as -.3. The reason is because you're not telling the meter how much to compensate, but rather how much it was off and in what direction, and it was in fact underexposing by 1/3 stop, thus -.3. It's a little confusing and what makes it a little more confusing is that it changed in the L-558R ad L-758DR. On these meters you are actually entering the offset amount and not the amount you were off. So if you're underexposing by 1/3 stop on an L-758DR you want to make the offset +.3.


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
20,506 posts
Likes: 3479
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Jul 20, 2008 15:58 |  #11

Robert, Thanks for the information.


Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
Sony A7rIV, , Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FE
Fuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macro
Canon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2.8 IS I

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
Jul 20, 2008 16:06 as a reply to  @ bobbyz's post |  #12

Sure thing.

In case it's not obvious, once you have the offset you need to take another test shot and look at that histogram to make sure you're gray spike it centered. If it's slightly off then adjust another 1/10 stop or the appropriate amount until you end up with a dead center gray spike.


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DigitalSpecialist
Goldmember
Avatar
2,286 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2008
Location: Finding a New World, thru my camera
     
Jul 20, 2008 17:03 |  #13

Excellent advice Robert


JIM
EOS 630, 1N, 1DsMkII, and 5D/wgrip and some L glass.....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
doidinho
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,352 posts
Likes: 23
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Kenmore, Washington
     
Jul 20, 2008 21:05 as a reply to  @ DigitalSpecialist's post |  #14

Thanks Robert, I should be able to get sorted now.


Robert McCadden
My Flickr (external link)
MM (external link)
5DMKII, Rebel xti, 24-105 f/4L, Canon 70-200 f/4L, Canon 17-40.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,229 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Sekonic L358 Overexposing?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2831 guests, 155 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.