C+C please.
Here they are.....
1:
3:
4:
5:
6:
7:
8:
Remember.... C+C PLEASE!!!
Thanks,
TrekPic Senior Member 656 posts Joined Mar 2008 Location: Waterloo, IA More info | Jul 20, 2008 16:03 | #1 C+C please. 3: 4: 5: 6: 7: 8: Remember.... C+C PLEASE!!! Thanks, Terry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 20, 2008 16:05 | #2 Here is #9: Terry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DigitalSpecialist Goldmember 2,286 posts Likes: 1 Joined May 2008 Location: Finding a New World, thru my camera More info | Jul 20, 2008 16:55 | #3 Gorgeous shots JIM
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 20, 2008 17:05 | #4 Thank you, sir. Terry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Lionstone Member 115 posts Joined May 2007 Location: Houston, TX More info | Jul 20, 2008 17:34 | #5 Very nice. The crops are a bit tight for my taste on a couple of them. Did you do that, or did you end up needing a wider lens than you planned? Rebel XT
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LeuceDeuce Goldmember 2,362 posts Joined Oct 2007 Location: Vancouver BC, Canada More info | The explosions are exposed well, and they are pretty, but there is no context. Fireworks need some kind of foreground element in order to get that WOW we all look for. my website: Light & Shadow
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 20, 2008 17:52 | #7 Lionstone wrote in post #5949016 Very nice. The crops are a bit tight for my taste on a couple of them. Did you do that, or did you end up needing a wider lens than you planned? ![]() Yea, my 18-55 crapped out on me so I had to use my 50mm. LeuceDeuce wrote in post #5949028 The explosions are exposed well, and they are pretty, but there is no context. Fireworks need some kind of foreground element in order to get that WOW we all look for. I'm still waiting to see a shot of the crowd all looking up in wonder as they are lit in multi-coloured hues. Very nice point. Guess I will have to wait until next year to try that. Terry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LeuceDeuce Goldmember 2,362 posts Joined Oct 2007 Location: Vancouver BC, Canada More info | Well we have a fireworks competition here for the next couple of weeks, and I'll see if I can put my money where my mouth is. my website: Light & Shadow
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pprice Goldmember 1,714 posts Joined Jun 2008 Location: Gods Country (aka Mississippi) More info | Jul 20, 2008 19:59 | #9 WOW, those are just great!! 1D MKIII 16-35 2.8L MKII 24-70 2.8L 70-200 2.8L [COLOR=black]IS 300 2.8L IS (few others) Bunch of AB lighting
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 20, 2008 20:42 | #10 pprice wrote in post #5949695 WOW, those are just great!! Thank you sooo much. Terry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ovjamaica Member 52 posts Joined Apr 2008 More info | Having attempted my own firework shots this year for the first time, I take my hat off to you. These look great!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
timrocks311 Senior Member 289 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jul 2008 Location: PA More info | Jul 21, 2008 20:35 | #12 i think they look great. i personally like fireworks shots with no foreground showing. the only thing i would do, like you tried, is go wider. 70D | 18-35 Art | 50 f/1.4 | 85 f/1.8 | 100L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Woolburr Rest in peace old friend. 66,487 posts Gallery: 115 photos Best ofs: 2 Likes: 143 Joined Sep 2005 Location: The Tupperware capitol of eastern Oregon...Leicester, NC! More info | Jul 21, 2008 20:47 | #13 #2 and #3 are excellent...contrary to previous assertions, there is no need to have anything on the ground or elsewhere to make the fireworks interesting. The only thing that looks odd is the fact that every single shot seems to have the exact same angle. Different vantage points can certainly change the looks of the shot. People that know me call me Dan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rx7speed Goldmember 1,204 posts Joined Jun 2008 More info | Jul 21, 2008 22:19 | #14 I really enjoy them though I'm curious on how you get them though where you even catch the center bursting. I've tried and haven't even come close. digital: 7d 70-200L 2.8 IS MKII, 17-55 2.8 IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 22, 2008 06:10 | #15 ovjamaica wrote in post #5956054 Having attempted my own firework shots this year for the first time, I take my hat off to you. These look great! Thank you very much. timrocks311 wrote in post #5957271 i think they look great. i personally like fireworks shots with no foreground showing. the only thing i would do, like you tried, is go wider. Yea, I got a 18-55 IS lens comming. Just have to remember to shut off IS when on tripod. Woolburr wrote in post #5957375 #2 and #3 are excellent...contrary to previous assertions, there is no need to have anything on the ground or elsewhere to make the fireworks interesting. The only thing that looks odd is the fact that every single shot seems to have the exact same angle. Different vantage points can certainly change the looks of the shot. The important question....are you happy with your results? Experimenting can really shake things up....give some different things a try next time out. Thank you for your kind comment. Comming from you means alot. rx7speed wrote in post #5958067 I really enjoy them though I'm curious on how you get them though where you even catch the center bursting. I've tried and haven't even come close. First off, thank you. Terry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2695 guests, 163 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||