Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 21 Jul 2008 (Monday) 00:16
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Nooob saying hi. Which filter to buy first?

 
nitrox28
Senior Member
Avatar
454 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Lexington, KY
     
Jul 21, 2008 00:16 |  #1

I bought a XSi a couple of days ago. So far, I'm pretty scared of it! :D Soooo much to learn. I bought a 4gb card and the salesman said I should get a UV or polarized filter for my lens. Which should I get? I'm so glad I found this forum!!


Kodak disposable, Ansco 35mm disk, Polaroid my parents gave me. That's about all I need really.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cricketboy75
Senior Member
665 posts
Joined Aug 2007
     
Jul 21, 2008 00:25 |  #2

if you can only afford 1 filter, i'd get a circular polarizer. it'll add value to your outdoor pics especially in bright light. there are arguments for and against using a UV filter. i find generally it doesn't cause any noticeable impairment of image quality.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nitrox28
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
454 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Lexington, KY
     
Jul 21, 2008 00:41 |  #3

Thanks. I'm not going to put alot of money into the kit lens since I'm saving for better glass right now. Circular polarizer it is! :D


Kodak disposable, Ansco 35mm disk, Polaroid my parents gave me. That's about all I need really.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DDCSD
GIVIN' GOOD KARMA
Avatar
13,313 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2007
Location: South Dakota
     
Jul 21, 2008 00:55 |  #4

Welcome to POTN!!!!!!

I would not waste my money on a UV filter. If you shoot landscapes, get a good CPL fiter from www.hvstar.net (external link) . If you do not shoot landscapes then save your money and spend a lot of time figuring out what you like to shoot. Post pictures here and take the advice of the great photographers here as to what you need to do to improve your photographs.


Derek
Bucketman Karma Fund
https://photography-on-the.net …php?p=9903477#p​ost9903477
POTN FF L2 MadTown Birds


Full Gear List & Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cricketboy75
Senior Member
665 posts
Joined Aug 2007
     
Jul 21, 2008 01:49 |  #5

nitrox28 wrote in post #5951365 (external link)
Thanks. I'm not going to put alot of money into the kit lens since I'm saving for better glass right now. Circular polarizer it is! :D

ah, missed that it's the kit lens. definitely don't bother with a UV filter. get a CPL. or if you like landscapes such as waterfalls you could even go for a Neutral Density filter.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cricketboy75
Senior Member
665 posts
Joined Aug 2007
     
Jul 21, 2008 01:50 |  #6

oh yes, and welcome to POTN!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Jul 21, 2008 08:27 |  #7

FAQ on UV and Clear Protective Filters


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
burntpixel
Senior Member
Avatar
879 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Down South
     
Jul 21, 2008 08:57 as a reply to  @ René Damkot's post |  #8

You can learn from my mistake ;)

I bought a circular polarizer for my EF-S 17-85 a year or so ago. I am now getting ready for a beach trip and needed a graduated neutral density filter to give me a few stops for at least a 4 second exposure.

What I now know...I can not use my circular polarizer with my cokin p-series filter holder (external link). This holder holds 3 filters so now what I am going to do is purchase the circular polarizer that fits the p-series holder (external link).

Now with this setup all I have to do is purchase the adapter ring (external link) for the size of each of my lenses, instead of buying a circular polarizer for each. The adapter rings are far less expensive than the purchase of a circular polarizer.

This link (external link) will take you the B&H cokin home page.

As far as what filter to go with starting out, I would definitely go with a circular polarizer and a neutral density. There are options on the ND filter that will give you from 2 - 8 stops.

Good luck and hope this helps,
bp


Matt | Gear | Site (external link) | flick (external link)r | fb (external link) | twitter (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Eagle ­ i
Senior Member
Avatar
767 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Virginia
     
Jul 21, 2008 10:13 |  #9

I too am a newb and mainly will be shooting nature/animals and am not 100% sure which type of filter to get(macro too)


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/mistergman/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cricketboy75
Senior Member
665 posts
Joined Aug 2007
     
Jul 21, 2008 21:23 |  #10

Eagle i wrote in post #5953502 (external link)
I too am a newb and mainly will be shooting nature/animals and am not 100% sure which type of filter to get(macro too)

taking those sort of shots, you probably don't need a filter, especially for macro and close-ups of animals. get a UV filter if it makes you feel better though and you feel like you need the protection...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nutsnbolts
Goldmember
Avatar
2,279 posts
Joined Jul 2007
Location: New Jersey, USA
     
Jul 21, 2008 22:49 |  #11

The salesperson is just trying to sell you more stuff.

But if you really want to, the first filter I think you should get is a polarizing filter. On the other hand, the UV filter is subjective. All it does it protect your lens and buy something that is not cheap.


Canon EOS 40D | EOS Rebel XTI/400D | G9
Lenses and Gear List
Review of my ThinkTank Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cricketboy75
Senior Member
665 posts
Joined Aug 2007
     
Jul 21, 2008 22:51 |  #12

nutsnbolts wrote in post #5958251 (external link)
The salesperson is just trying to sell you more stuff.

But if you really want to, the first filter I think you should get is a polarizing filter. On the other hand, the UV filter is subjective. All it does it protect your lens and buy something that is not cheap.

actually, i do agree. if you can only get 1 filter make it a circular polarizer.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gooble
Goldmember
Avatar
3,149 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Mesa,AZ
     
Jul 21, 2008 23:04 |  #13

Forget UV filters.

Be aware that CPs cut about 2 stops of light and that'll kill hand holding in late evening unless you have IS.

CPs have specific uses an should not be used at all times and can be overdone/overused.

If you're not shooting landscapes with the horizon in the picture (ie sky and earth in the shot at once) graduated ND filters have little use.

ND filters are really only useful when you want long shutter speeds in brightly lit outdoor situations for creative purposes, ex. to get long exposures on running water, carnival rides at night.

Also, if you're new to photography and DSLRs that last thing I'd worry about is getting filters.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tunin
Goldmember
Avatar
1,193 posts
Likes: 5
Joined May 2007
Location: New York, NY - Medjugorje, BiH
     
Jul 22, 2008 05:42 |  #14

If you're going to upgrade to L lenses soon, getting a cpl or any other filter for the kit lens is a waste of money as most of the L lenses are 77mm and up (16-35L 82mm)... I would wait and learn how to use the camera with the kit lens with what you got now and when the time comes hit an L lens and a B+W CPL or something like that...


I am not young enough to know everything. O.W.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fatcat2000
Member
Avatar
35 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: Indiana
     
Jul 22, 2008 07:21 as a reply to  @ tunin's post |  #15

great last post. i just spent over 100 on a CP for my 70 - 200. Then purchased the 24 - 105 for a walk around. The CP fits both lenses. It's one less item to fill up my bag and goes on 2 lenses.

Great comment Tunin




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,699 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
Nooob saying hi. Which filter to buy first?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2669 guests, 163 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.