Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 21 Jul 2008 (Monday) 23:58
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

CPL for 17-40L & 10-22

 
John_TX
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,471 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Texas
     
Jul 31, 2008 22:03 |  #16

Tsmith wrote in post #6023569 (external link)
John I've had the Hoya and now the B+W and always just look through the viewfinder while rotating the filter for the desired amount of polarization. Often times its better to back off the full effect. The filter works great eliminating glare on a water surface too.

On a side note many people have stated how much easier it is to clean the B+W over the Hoya. For me its been the exact opposite of that.

Toney, thank you for the numerous pointers. I'll give that a go. When I got home this evening, I quickly attached the CPL and took a couple shots outside and gave the filter a couple of spins while looking through the viewfinder. To be quite honest, it was extremely difficult to tell the difference spinning it. However, thinking back, I clearly wasn't even close to 90-degrees with the sun when I had the filter on the lens...probably more like 120-degrees. That probably explains the issues with rotating the filter.

I did notice a profound difference rotating just the filter earlier this evening right before sunset, so I think I've got it pretty much squared away.

RE: Cleaning filters
I too remember hearing that the Hoya's were much easier to clean than the B+W's. Any recommendations (especially for fingerprints/smudges)?

Even if the B+W's are harder to keep clean, I still think it was the right choice, especially given the fact that the Kaesemann is a sealed design. I will definitely be putting this to good use in SD, as the wind just about never stops! Be it dust or snow, it will be nice not having to worry about junk & moisture getting between the polarizer foil layers.


5D4 | 5D3 | 16-35 f4 IS | 24-105 f4 IS | 70-200 f4 IS | 100-400 II | Sigma 20 f/1.4 ART | Sigma 35 f/1.4 ART | EF 1.4x III | EF 2x II | 430EX II |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tsmith
Formerly known as Bluedog_XT
Avatar
10,429 posts
Likes: 26
Joined Jul 2005
Location: South_the 601
     
Jul 31, 2008 22:15 |  #17

Use it in the morning, mid day and evening, you'll quickly learn its capabilities.

Its just the opposite John as the Hoyas are the ones everybody complains about being hard to keep clean. Mine was relatively easy as compared to the B+W I know have. Currently I'm using Giottos Optical Solution. First applied to lens tissue paper then finished with a microfiber cloth. Mine got quite dirty at times in Glacier National Park recently but it certainly didn't have any affect on my photos that I can tell.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davewolfs
Member
78 posts
Joined Aug 2008
     
Aug 01, 2008 15:46 |  #18

Nikon makes a very good 77mm slim CPL that will work with a standard lens cap.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gooble
Goldmember
Avatar
3,149 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Mesa,AZ
     
Aug 04, 2008 18:03 |  #19

Tsmith wrote in post #6023753 (external link)
Use it in the morning, mid day and evening, you'll quickly learn its capabilities.

Its just the opposite John as the Hoyas are the ones everybody complains about being hard to keep clean. Mine was relatively easy as compared to the B+W I know have. Currently I'm using Giottos Optical Solution. First applied to lens tissue paper then finished with a microfiber cloth. Mine got quite dirty at times in Glacier National Park recently but it certainly didn't have any affect on my photos that I can tell.

Can't you use a CPL for best effect anytime of day if facing pretty much north or south and any direction around noon?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Aug 04, 2008 19:02 |  #20

Depends on latitude and time of year. North's fairly safe in the Northern Hemisphere; South will be problematic especially at high latitudes and in the winter months. Just the opposite will apply in the Southern Hemisphere.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John_TX
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,471 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Texas
     
Aug 04, 2008 19:21 as a reply to  @ Jon's post |  #21

Should you remove a CPL if you're shooting on a bright day, but are not facing in the optimal directions for the CPL?


5D4 | 5D3 | 16-35 f4 IS | 24-105 f4 IS | 70-200 f4 IS | 100-400 II | Sigma 20 f/1.4 ART | Sigma 35 f/1.4 ART | EF 1.4x III | EF 2x II | 430EX II |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tsmith
Formerly known as Bluedog_XT
Avatar
10,429 posts
Likes: 26
Joined Jul 2005
Location: South_the 601
     
Aug 04, 2008 22:07 |  #22

Not necessarily John. I have a tendency to leave mine on a lot while removing it late in the evening.

They work great for reducing glare in green foliage on bright sunny days.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John_TX
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,471 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Texas
     
Aug 04, 2008 22:13 as a reply to  @ Tsmith's post |  #23

I figured, at worst, it made no difference, and at best, would help.

Speaking of which, I spent most of yesterday shooting around the Austin, TX area trying out my new CPL. I left it on the entire time. There were only a handful of times where my location in relation to the sun really allowed the CPL to stretch its legs, but even then, I really like the added contrast & saturation the CPL added to other shots.


5D4 | 5D3 | 16-35 f4 IS | 24-105 f4 IS | 70-200 f4 IS | 100-400 II | Sigma 20 f/1.4 ART | Sigma 35 f/1.4 ART | EF 1.4x III | EF 2x II | 430EX II |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,297 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
CPL for 17-40L & 10-22
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2704 guests, 161 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.