Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 23 Jul 2008 (Wednesday) 01:50
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

AB VS Elinchroms

 
AmpedPhoto
Goldmember
Avatar
1,165 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Mar 2006
Location: socal
     
Jul 23, 2008 01:50 |  #1

Ok guys I have been looking into adding some more studio lighting equip. I have a ARB-800 and 1 B-800. I have had 3 Ab-800 in the past but sold them to pay some bills but now looking to add or replace. My question is, is there any major benefits to switching to Elinchroms 400's? I know there about 70 watt seconds difference and a digital interface along with a audio option. So please drop your 2 cents on the Elinchroms 400 vs the AB line along with there softboxs ect


Canon 5D Mark II (x2), 30D, 40D, G10, 70-200 F4 IS (x2), 16-35 f2.8 L, 50mm 1.4, 430 EX II (x2), 580 EX II Tamron 28-75 F2.8 (x2), Tonkia 12-24 F4, 10-18 Fisheye, Full studio with some light :)
AmpedPhoto.com (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rudi
Goldmember
Avatar
3,751 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2002
Location: Australia
     
Jul 23, 2008 03:34 |  #2

The Elinchrom softboxes are amazing! That alone would (and did) sway me toward Elinchrom. I used to have a Bowens kit some years back, chose Elinchrom for their light modifiers this time around. Elin strobes will also be more consistent than AB in their light output.


• Wedding Photographer - Sydney and Wollongong (external link)
• Borrowed Moment (blog) (external link)

Life is uncertain. Eat dessert first.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
Jul 23, 2008 07:10 as a reply to  @ Rudi's post |  #3

Hi Michael.

Can you clarify which strobes you mean?

Elinchrom makes a Style 400BX which is 400ws and a D-Lite 4 which is also 400ws.

Overall performance is about the same but there are some key differences (aside from price). The 400BX has the secondary umbrella mount so you can use standard umbrellas without having to use only brands that make the 7mm shaft.

The build and swivel mount on the BX are significantly better in all respects and can accommodate larger, heavier modifiers than the D-Lite will hold securely.

One feature that may or may not be important to some is the ability to completely separate the power levels of the flash and modeling light. You're not locking in to proportional lighting or the standard full, half and off settings. You can set the modeling light to any power level regardless of the flash power.

I know it looks lke I've made a very good case for getting the BX but that doesn't mean that the D-Lite's are a bad choice or shouldn't be considered. For some people, the affordability and performance of the D-Lite makes up for what it does not have and they are excellent strobes.


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hermes
Goldmember
2,375 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: London, UK
     
Jul 23, 2008 07:37 |  #4

I've only tried the ABs a couple of times as they're pretty rare here in the UK, but from what I've seen they stand up pretty well against Elinchroms, though their output isn't as consistent or precise. What would turn me off ever using them is the lack of high-quality heads or modifiers, and the limited range of accessories.

Elinchrom have a much better range of specialist accessories (reflectors, spots, indirect banks, e.t.c.), and their softboxes and umbrellas are generally superior. The Elinchrom BXs are the best value strobes I've ever used. There are more expensive options (brons, profoto, e.t.c.) but you are paying a big price for marginally better features if you don't need their higher output. There are cheaper options (ebay kits, D-lites, e.t.c.) but they just aren't solid or reliable enough to do everything, and sooner or later you'll find yourself limited by them.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
M ­ Powered
Goldmember
Avatar
1,476 posts
Joined Oct 2007
     
Jul 23, 2008 12:12 |  #5

How do Elinchrom accessories compare to Photoflex's? I know AB's quality is sub par, but photoflexes are built VERY well. Hell, sometimes put my softboxes in the ocean to wash off the sand :)


Canon 5D Mark III | EF 24-70 f/ 2.8 L II

http://www.keslertran.​com (external link)
http://keslertran.tumb​lr.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DavidPhoto
Senior Member
777 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2007
Location: MA, USA
     
Jul 23, 2008 17:17 |  #6

I wouldnt put my elinchrom sb's into the ocean! They'd probably not comeout in one piece. They are not the toughest SB's I've used but they do produce great quality light.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
Jul 23, 2008 17:25 as a reply to  @ DavidPhoto's post |  #7

Some of the Elinchrom octa's are built really well. I'm not familiar enough with the entire product line but they do seem to use quality materials and construction looks to be excellent.

I own a few Photoflex boxes and I would say that the Elinchrom's are on a par with Photoflex. I don't think the build is any better but they tend to produce more even light than the Photoflex boxes, which are pretty darn good.


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DavidPhoto
Senior Member
777 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2007
Location: MA, USA
     
Jul 23, 2008 17:35 |  #8

I have the midi octa and it is not made that well imo. The inner reflective material tore away at a seem the first time I took it out. Someone else said theirs did the same.
I also have the Deep Throat Rotalux which is holding up so far (and is my favorite SB) but doesnt feel very strong. The deep throat produces fantastic light though.

If I could put them together and leave them assembled in the studio they would most likely be fine but I have to tear them down and reassemble all the time. Photoflex seem much better made to me but do not have the Elinchrom light quality.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hermes
Goldmember
2,375 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: London, UK
     
Jul 23, 2008 17:51 |  #9

DavidPhoto wrote in post #5970803 (external link)
I have the midi octa and it is not made that well imo. The inner reflective material tore away at a seem the first time I took it out. Someone else said theirs did the same.
I also have the Deep Throat Rotalux which is holding up so far (and is my favorite SB) but doesnt feel very strong. The deep throat produces fantastic light though.

If I could put them together and leave them assembled in the studio they would most likely be fine but I have to tear them down and reassemble all the time. Photoflex seem much better made to me but do not have the Elinchrom light quality.

My midi Octa had a hole melted into it when the silver deflector I was using inside it swivelled round on it's shaft and touched the inside surface. I know for a fact that wouldn't have happened with my konova or other third-party softboxes, despite the fact that the octa cost five times as much. Their reflectors, dishes, spots, e.t.c. are all well-made but Elinchrom's softboxes have dissapointing build-quality even if the light they produce is very good.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DavidPhoto
Senior Member
777 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2007
Location: MA, USA
     
Jul 23, 2008 17:59 |  #10

wow that sucks. You're lucky it didnt start a fire!
I almost had that happen yesterday too. I noticed it was a little loose as I was putting the diffuser on and luckily caught it in time before that happened. I could totally see that happening though.
I agree the build quality is disappointing. I was thinking of getting a large Octa someday but if the build quality is similar to the others I may save my money. That said, I totally love the deep throat (at least until it falls apart).




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
Jul 23, 2008 18:02 as a reply to  @ DavidPhoto's post |  #11

That really does suck. That's the first I've heard of this kind of problem or poor construction.


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hermes
Goldmember
2,375 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: London, UK
     
Jul 23, 2008 18:30 |  #12

I managed to patch it up pretty well with electrical tape on the outside and aluminium foil on the inside - you really have to look hard to spot it but still, it's pretty shoddy construction for a £200 softbox.

From now on I'll be buying third party softboxes and having them modified to get the light output how I want it. I have a 180cm octabox with two internal diffusers and a deflector which cost me about 70 quid to buy & modify, is heatproof, and has a more even output than just about anything I've ever seen.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DavidPhoto
Senior Member
777 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2007
Location: MA, USA
     
Jul 23, 2008 18:38 |  #13

that's a shame. Robert would be screwed as he can't tape his equipment!!!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
Jul 23, 2008 18:39 |  #14

DavidPhoto wrote in post #5971203 (external link)
that's a shame. Robert would be screwed as he can't tape his equipment!!!

You're right David. Totally screwed! ;)


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rudi
Goldmember
Avatar
3,751 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2002
Location: Australia
     
Jul 23, 2008 20:04 |  #15

Hermes wrote in post #5971161 (external link)
I have a 180cm octabox with two internal diffusers and a deflector which cost me about 70 quid to buy & modify, is heatproof, and has a more even output than just about anything I've ever seen.

Do tell! What is it? A 180cm Octa for that sort of money, I want one!


• Wedding Photographer - Sydney and Wollongong (external link)
• Borrowed Moment (blog) (external link)

Life is uncertain. Eat dessert first.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,716 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
AB VS Elinchroms
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2753 guests, 145 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.