Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 23 Jul 2008 (Wednesday) 10:58
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Which external flash unit for 17-40mm?

 
saralee
Member
192 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Great North
     
Jul 23, 2008 10:58 |  #1

I have two choices so far – 430EX or 580EX II.

Not having read extensive reviews of the two flash units above I am gonna go for user advice on this board.

I will mainly use the flash for occasional indoor portrait shots with my 17-40mm.

By the way, 'Hello' to everyone. I am new to this board.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pete-eos
Goldmember
Avatar
1,999 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2006
Location: SW London UK
     
Jul 23, 2008 11:12 |  #2

Start with the 430EX II and move onto the 580EX when you want to get wireless in my opinion.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
saralee
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
192 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Great North
     
Jul 23, 2008 11:20 |  #3

Is the coverage the same between 430EX and 580EX II? My local shop doesn't have the 430EX II plus it doesn't qualify for the rebate :oops: at the moment.

Pete-eos wrote in post #5968514 (external link)
Start with the 430EX II and move onto the 580EX when you want to get wireless in my opinion.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
saralee
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
192 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Great North
     
Jul 23, 2008 11:23 as a reply to  @ saralee's post |  #4

I have a 40D if that helps determining my need.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pete-eos
Goldmember
Avatar
1,999 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2006
Location: SW London UK
     
Jul 23, 2008 11:26 |  #5

Afraid I can't answer anything to technical :oops:, I use the 430EX I and it more than covers my needs, if there is a rebate on the I go for that. It's a very capable flash and can often keep up with 6.5 fps bursts! I'd ask this in the flash section for more detailed answers.

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/forumdis​play.php?f=35




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ef2
Goldmember
Avatar
1,135 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
     
Jul 23, 2008 11:48 |  #6

I think the 580 should be significantly stronger.


5D Mk III
Canon 580EX
Canon 16-35mm f/2.8L | 24mm f/3.5L | 50mm f/1.4 | 100mm f/2.0 | 100mm f/2.8 Macro | 135mm f/2.8 SF | 70-200mm [COLOR=black]f/2.8L IS | 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 DO
Sigma 50mm f/1.4 EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
madhatter04
Goldmember
1,930 posts
Likes: 52
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Southern California
     
Jul 23, 2008 12:37 |  #7

I currently use the 430 with the 17-40 without ever wishing for more, but make sure you use the lens without the hood because it causes shadows.


Designer // Art Director // Photographer
www.alexanderfitch.com (external link) | AlexFitchPhoto on Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eelnoraa
Goldmember
1,798 posts
Likes: 37
Joined May 2007
     
Jul 23, 2008 12:40 as a reply to  @ madhatter04's post |  #8

They both work pretty well. 580 is higher power, more features, but also bigger. If you can afford a 580 and don't mind the size, get 580. Otherwise, 430 is just as good in most case.

eel


5Di, 5Diii, 28, 50, 85, 16-35II, 24-105, 70-200F2.8 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mlav
Goldmember
Avatar
1,227 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Detroit, USA
     
Jul 23, 2008 12:43 |  #9

Get the 580II. It runs barely $400. (I paid $500 when it came out)

Add another or a 430 when you want to shoot off camera. I have used my 580II/580/430 with my 17-40, coverage is good for all of them when shooting at 17 (on a crop).


http://mlav.com (external link)http://www.flickr.com/​photos/mlavander/sets/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JCheungPhoto
Goldmember
Avatar
1,338 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Virginia
     
Jul 23, 2008 12:47 |  #10

I've used a 430EX on a 5D with the 17-40 mounted with not too many problems at all, but you do need to stow the lens hood somewhere else. The 430EX is great for general use, but of course the 580EXII is better. I may sell the 430EX to fund a 580EXII in the future


gear
freewebs.com/jcheungph​otography

"prior planning prevents piss-poor performance"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Emergenic
Member
Avatar
143 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Planet Earth
     
Jul 23, 2008 13:22 as a reply to  @ JCheungPhoto's post |  #11

I just got my 580EX II today, and I really like it!!!...It's replacing my old full featured Olympus FL50 which I sold when I jumped to Canon, but ti be honest If was not already used to having this type of flash unit I would start with the 430EX...


Flickr (external link) | MyGear

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=614171

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
saralee
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
192 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Great North
     
Jul 23, 2008 13:25 as a reply to  @ JCheungPhoto's post |  #12

Thanks every for your opinion. And thanks to madhatter04 and JCheungPhoto for pointing out the hood issue.

I've read many people use the Canon EW-83D hood on the cropped body, will this hood present the same shadow casting problem with the flash unit?

When you say that the 580EX II produces more power, I assume that means it provides more coverage? I will mostly use it to do portraits shots indoor with the 17-40 so I think I will be pretty close to the subject. Would you say the 430EX is enough? I am a total beginning when it comes to external flash so I can't even fathom myself positioning the flash off the camera and trigger it remotely :oops:.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JCheungPhoto
Goldmember
Avatar
1,338 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Virginia
     
Jul 23, 2008 13:29 |  #13

more coverage means distance. For indoor shooting, the casual shooter and those who don't want the extra weight will like the 430EX. It's a very capable flash that has gotten me through a couple weddings and portrait shoots.


gear
freewebs.com/jcheungph​otography

"prior planning prevents piss-poor performance"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
inthedeck
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,579 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 1140
Joined Sep 2006
Location: St. Augustine, Florida
     
Jul 23, 2008 13:32 |  #14

I'd go with the 580 EX or EX II. This way, when you get more advanced, you can get another flash, that will be controlled by the 580. It does get heavy though, once on board a camera, with the 17-40. I have a 5D and use that combo often (5D + 17-40 + 580EX) and it's not light...hehe.

Of course, there's always the Sigma flashes, as well as the Sunpak ones...so, you could look into those, as well.

Good luck in your decision.


MCSquared Photography (external link) on WWW
MCSquared Photography (external link) on Flickr
MCSquared Photography (external link) on IG
My name: Manish.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dave92270
Senior Member
Avatar
400 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: SoCal
     
Jul 23, 2008 13:38 as a reply to  @ JCheungPhoto's post |  #15

I'd say go with 580 EX II; the flash delivers decent output and you may find it useful to have that extra light available some day. The flash is not that big as you may think. Here is a sample shot done with 580; the area in the image is illuminated pretty much only by the 580 EX II mounted on my 35mm SLR; there were no other lights out there except tiny candles on the ground... 580 made it look like daylight..almost. I also considered 430 ex before, and I'm glad that I picked up 580...

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

5DMk2+EF 24-105mm F4 L, 40D+EF-S 17-55mm f2.8, Alien Bees, more stuff...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,712 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Which external flash unit for 17-40mm?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is johntmyers418
1052 guests, 175 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.