Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 27 Jul 2008 (Sunday) 22:47
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

XSI/450D low ISO noise?

 
Jim ­ Holtz
Senior Member
Avatar
452 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
     
Jul 27, 2008 22:47 |  #1

I was planning on upgrading to a XSi from my XTi to take advantage of the lower high ISO noise. However, I've been reading a few posts on other boards talking about increased low ISO noise on the XSi that shows up in dark areas as low as ISO 100. That was disturbing.

I've not seen it in any sample images or heard it commented on in any reviews. Anyone here see low ISO noise with their XSi/450D?

Thanks for the feedback!

Jim




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
j00sten
Senior Member
509 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Location: SoCal
     
Jul 27, 2008 23:40 |  #2

I have yet to see any low ISO noise except when I get the exposure wrong. I imagine that most people who see this phenomena are just exposing incorrectly.


[7D] [Tokina 11-16] [Sigma 50 ΣX] [24-70L] [580EX II]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cptrios
Goldmember
Avatar
1,744 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Boston, USA / Burgundy, France
     
Jul 28, 2008 00:01 |  #3

I've personally noticed a BIT of noise at slowish ISO speeds in the following situations:

• In OK light, only in areas with vast expanses of mild and uniform darkness
• In low light, in which cases only the IS allows a picture to be taken at said ISO speed
• With the pop-up flashed bounced with my Lightscoop

Interestingly enough, I've found that when shooting with the lightscoop at a fairly narrow aperture, there's not much noise difference among ISO 200, 400, and 800. Bouncing the flash diminishes the light of the already-not-so-powerful pop-up, so you can almost consider it a low-light situation.

As per j00sten's comment, I agree...I'm still learning, and I haven't quite nipped that incorrect-exposure bug yet!


Fuji X100 / Sony NEX-7 / Contax G 45mm f/2 / The ghosts of 3 Canon bodies past / A meagre amount of talent
My weak lil' 500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jim ­ Holtz
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
452 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
     
Jul 28, 2008 07:30 |  #4

cptrios wrote in post #5997506 (external link)
I've personally noticed a BIT of noise at slowish ISO speeds in the following situations:

• In OK light, only in areas with vast expanses of mild and uniform darkness
• In low light, in which cases only the IS allows a picture to be taken at said ISO speed
• With the pop-up flashed bounced with my Lightscoop

Interestingly enough, I've found that when shooting with the lightscoop at a fairly narrow aperture, there's not much noise difference among ISO 200, 400, and 800. Bouncing the flash diminishes the light of the already-not-so-powerful pop-up, so you can almost consider it a low-light situation.

As per j00sten's comment, I agree...I'm still learning, and I haven't quite nipped that incorrect-exposure bug yet!

Dark areas in a photo that was underexposed and photo's that were over processed were the situations the posters said the XSi exhibited more noise than the XTi. The trade off was the much better high ISO noise performance of the XSi.

So, do both of you have high ISO noise reduction turned on? Are you shooting RAW or JPEG?

Thanks for your responses!

Jim




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
j00sten
Senior Member
509 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Location: SoCal
     
Jul 28, 2008 09:08 |  #5

I usually have it turned off because strictly shoot in RAW. The only thing that I know of that affects raw atm is highlight tonal priority but I could easily be wrong.


[7D] [Tokina 11-16] [Sigma 50 ΣX] [24-70L] [580EX II]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cptrios
Goldmember
Avatar
1,744 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Boston, USA / Burgundy, France
     
Jul 28, 2008 17:58 |  #6

I don't shoot with it either; I prefer reducing noise myself over leaving it up to the camera and being powerless to get back the lost detail.

If I get up early enough tomorrow morning I'll go out and take a bunch of comparison shots at 100, 200, 400, 600, 800, and 1600 in JPEG, JPEG with high ISO noise reduction, and RAW. But that's a big "if!"


Fuji X100 / Sony NEX-7 / Contax G 45mm f/2 / The ghosts of 3 Canon bodies past / A meagre amount of talent
My weak lil' 500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Spacemunkie
Goldmember
Avatar
1,549 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 187
Joined Apr 2008
     
Jul 28, 2008 18:16 as a reply to  @ cptrios's post |  #7

40D is the way to go for better high ISO noise performance.


Flickr (external link)
Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
midnight_rider
"Thrown under the bus."
Avatar
5,413 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Yonder by the crick, Ga
     
Jul 28, 2008 18:17 |  #8

j00sten wrote in post #5997405 (external link)
I have yet to see any low ISO noise except when I get the exposure wrong. I imagine that most people who see this phenomena are just exposing incorrectly.

+1 Proper exposure is key.


I never, Not once claimed to read your post...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jim ­ Holtz
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
452 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
     
Jul 28, 2008 20:34 |  #9

cptrios wrote in post #6002306 (external link)
I don't shoot with it either; I prefer reducing noise myself over leaving it up to the camera and being powerless to get back the lost detail.

If I get up early enough tomorrow morning I'll go out and take a bunch of comparison shots at 100, 200, 400, 600, 800, and 1600 in JPEG, JPEG with high ISO noise reduction, and RAW. But that's a big "if!"

I would really like to see the comparison. I read the reviews over and over comparing the noise etc. but there's nothing like real world comparisons.

Thank you!

Jim




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mikepaco
Member
36 posts
Joined Jan 2008
     
Jul 28, 2008 23:32 |  #10

I've noticed this is as well, it seems very low isos have noticeable noise.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jbone
Senior Member
279 posts
Joined Aug 2007
     
Jul 29, 2008 00:41 |  #11

If I was gonna fork out the cash for an xsi, Id save a little longer for the 40D


Note: This post may contain misspellings, grammatical errors, disorganized sentence structure, or may entirely lack a coherent theme. These elements are natural to the process of writing, and will only add to the overall beauty of the post.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cptrios
Goldmember
Avatar
1,744 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Boston, USA / Burgundy, France
     
Jul 29, 2008 06:32 |  #12

Alright, this is about as quick and dirty as it gets (and no RAW, because RAW doesn't seem to be behaving well with my Mac at the moment). I'll post bigger versions later...for now I have to go to work. Top row has high ISO NR turned on, bottom is off. From left to right, ISO 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600. All taken in full auto mode for consistency (and the cropped area is in the corner and off the focus plane, so I want no sharpness comments!)


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Fuji X100 / Sony NEX-7 / Contax G 45mm f/2 / The ghosts of 3 Canon bodies past / A meagre amount of talent
My weak lil' 500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cptrios
Goldmember
Avatar
1,744 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Boston, USA / Burgundy, France
     
Jul 29, 2008 06:36 |  #13

Bottom line from my tests...there is a very small bit of noise at 400 if you pixel peep, but it doesn't get truly noticeable in, say, 8x10 size until 1600. And even then it's really not that bad. Low light situations, obviously, are going to be worse.

I suppose the long story short vis a vis a few of the above posts is: if you can afford a 40d, buy one! I'm totally happy with the XSi as my first dSLR, and it should last me at least a year, or until the 50d comes out :lol:


Fuji X100 / Sony NEX-7 / Contax G 45mm f/2 / The ghosts of 3 Canon bodies past / A meagre amount of talent
My weak lil' 500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jim ­ Holtz
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
452 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
     
Jul 29, 2008 08:08 |  #14

cptrios wrote in post #6005722 (external link)
Bottom line from my tests...there is a very small bit of noise at 400 if you pixel peep, but it doesn't get truly noticeable in, say, 8x10 size until 1600. And even then it's really not that bad. Low light situations, obviously, are going to be worse.

I suppose the long story short vis a vis a few of the above posts is: if you can afford a 40d, buy one! I'm totally happy with the XSi as my first dSLR, and it should last me at least a year, or until the 50d comes out :lol:

cptrios,

Thanks for getting up early and posting the comparison. I'm really pixal peeping and I just don't see any noise issues 100-400 ISO. I can see a little noise at 800 in the image with out NR turned on and much more at 1600. However, the 800 and 1600 with NR turned on look excellent. I've been shooting RAW but the XSi might convince me to shoot RAW + JPEG since NR doesn't work on RAW. The high ISO JPEGs look great.

Thanks again!

Jim




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jim ­ Holtz
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
452 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
     
Jul 29, 2008 08:12 |  #15

jbone wrote in post #6004675 (external link)
If I was gonna fork out the cash for an xsi, Id save a little longer for the 40D

I've read the reviews (everywhere) of both the XSi and 40D. Considering image quality and noise only but not build, FPS or personal preference for the size of the cameras, what is it about the 40D that you find superior to the XSi?

Jim




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,458 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
XSI/450D low ISO noise?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
926 guests, 179 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.