Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 17 Jan 2005 (Monday) 22:17
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Preliminary Flash Inquiry

 
psychonaut
Member
93 posts
Joined Jan 2005
     
Jan 17, 2005 22:17 |  #1

for Digital Rebel looking at the following flash units:

Sigma EF500 DG Super
Canon 420EX
Canon 550EX

so i get it the model numbers ( 500, 420, 550 ) refer to its output power but exactly what is the definition of this Guide No. thing ? how much more power does 55 have than 50 ?

also from Sigma's page for EF500 DG Super it seems that it doesnt support red eye reduction for EOS !? and from another page it appears Sigma has a host of other issues ...

can somebody outline in general terms what tradeoffs we are looking at with these 3 flash units ? ( i dont really want to consider 580EX because Rebel supposedly does not have E-TTL2 anyway )

:shock:

?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MT
Senior Member
453 posts
Joined Mar 2004
Location: Missouri, USA
     
Jan 17, 2005 22:28 |  #2

http://www.chem.helsin​ki.fi …s/photo/flash-faq.html#gn (external link)" target="_blank">GN numbers explained




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
psychonaut
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
93 posts
Joined Jan 2005
     
Jan 18, 2005 00:17 as a reply to  @ MT's post |  #3

MT wrote:
http://www.chem.helsin​ki.fi …s/photo/flash-faq.html#gn (external link)" target="_blank">GN numbers explained

thanx for the link, looks promising, i am falling asleep right now but i will get to studying it when i am in condition to do so.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scottbergerphoto
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,429 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
     
Jan 18, 2005 06:24 as a reply to  @ psychonaut's post |  #4

The Guide Number is the Maximum Distance a flash can travel at ISO 100 at f/1.0 It is a very useful number because the Maximum Distance your flash can travel at a particular f stop is expressed as the Guide Number / F stop at ISO 100
Distance = GN / f stop

For ISO 200 multiply by 1.4
For ISO 400 multiply by 2

This is useful for comparing flashes and using manual flash. Keep in mind though, that manufacturers may exaggerate their GN's.
Scott


One World, One Voice Against Terror,
Best Regards,
Scott
ScottBergerPhotography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Avatar
12,842 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
     
Jan 18, 2005 06:47 |  #5

One big thing to note between the 420 and 550 is that the 550 can be fully manual. The 420 is completely controlled by the camera, which means that you only have FEC to limit/increase flash output. The DRebel doesn't have FEC unless you use the hacked firmware, and even then you only get +/- 2 stops of control. This might not be so important depending on what you shoot. If you mostly do family gatherings and general/average use of the flash then it might be insignificant. But if you use the flash at the extremes then it will definitely make a difference.

Fill flash in extreme situations can also be an issue with a 420 because of this. If you need/want to add just a tiny amount of fill flash then the 420 is just about useless IMHO.

Extremes... I do almost all wildlife shooting. For macro photography (butterflies mainly) I found that I get too close for ETTL to be effective, and every shot was basically blown out because ETTL couldn't possibly stop the flash output in time. With the 420 it was all hit or miss because ETTL couldn't do it's job. Yes, I could set up the camera for f/22 but then I lost all the nice background blur and had to settle for longer shutter speeds. I ditched the 420 and got a 550 which I could then set to 1/32nd power or 1/16th or whatever. It's now a manual process but I can make it work with the 550.

My reasoning for getting the 550 works for me - it may mean nothing to you. The 550 is a lot more expensive than the 420, so think hard.


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info (external link)
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
psychonaut
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
93 posts
Joined Jan 2005
     
Jan 25, 2005 19:29 as a reply to  @ Scottes's post |  #6

so uhm, no word on sigma ?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hellashot
Goldmember
4,617 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2004
Location: USA
     
Jan 26, 2005 10:35 |  #7
bannedPermanent ban

psychonaut wrote:
for Digital Rebel looking at the following flash units:

Sigma EF500 DG Super
Canon 420EX
Canon 550EX

so i get it the model numbers ( 500, 420, 550 ) refer to its output power but exactly what is the definition of this Guide No. thing ? how much more power does 55 have than 50 ?

can somebody outline in general terms what tradeoffs we are looking at with these 3 flash units ? ( i dont really want to consider 580EX because Rebel supposedly does not have E-TTL2 anyway )

?

No, the model numbers are just model numbers. You need to look at the guide numbers in the specs of each unit. You can find them at www.canonusa.com (external link) and www.sigmaphoto.com (external link) And the 580EX is slightly more powerful than the 550EX plus it boasts a recycle time half that of the 550EX. I probably would have gotten the 580EX if I hadn't just bought the 550EX before the 580EX was announced.


5D, Drebel, EOS-3, K1000
lenses from 12mm-500mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Jan 26, 2005 12:15 as a reply to  @ Hellashot's post |  #8

Hellashot wrote:
No, the model numbers are just model numbers. You need to look at the guide numbers in the specs of each unit. You can find them at www.canonusa.com (external link) and www.sigmaphoto.com (external link) And the 580EX is slightly more powerful than the 550EX plus it boasts a recycle time half that of the 550EX. I probably would have gotten the 580EX if I hadn't just bought the 550EX before the 580EX was announced.

The model number is not the guide number but the model number is based on the maximum guide number (in meters) of the flash for all the Canon flashes (at leat the EX series flashes). For example, the 580EX has a GN of 58, the 550EX, GN of 55, etc. The same goes for the Sigma 500 DG flashes, too.


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scottbergerphoto
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,429 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
     
Jan 26, 2005 12:16 as a reply to  @ Hellashot's post |  #9

Hellashot wrote:
No, the model numbers are just model numbers. You need to look at the guide numbers in the specs of each unit. You can find them at www.canonusa.com (external link) and www.sigmaphoto.com (external link) And the 580EX is slightly more powerful than the 550EX plus it boasts a recycle time half that of the 550EX. I probably would have gotten the 580EX if I hadn't just bought the 550EX before the 580EX was announced.

Not actually true.
For Canon EX Series Flashes, the first two numbers of the flash are is the Guide Number.
550EX = 55M
420EX = 42M
580EX = 58M
Scott


One World, One Voice Against Terror,
Best Regards,
Scott
ScottBergerPhotography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
robertwgross
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,462 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2002
Location: California
     
Jan 26, 2005 13:11 as a reply to  @ scottbergerphoto's post |  #10

scottbergerphoto wrote:
Not actually true.
For Canon EX Series Flashes, the first two numbers of the flash are is the Guide Number.
550EX = 55M
420EX = 42M
580EX = 58M
Scott

I'll add the further clarification that the Canon guide numbers are the MAXIMUM guide numbers, and the refer to a single optimal flash zoom length. In the 550EX book, the guide numbers range from 15 to 55, expressed in meters, of course.

---Bob Gross---




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Jan 26, 2005 13:47 as a reply to  @ PacAce's post |  #11

PacAce wrote:
The model number is not the guide number but the model number is based on the maximum guide number (in meters) of the flash for all the Canon flashes (at leat the EX series flashes). For example, the 580EX has a GN of 58, the 550EX, GN of 55, etc. The same goes for the Sigma 500 DG flashes, too.

Ahem, looks like I beat you guys to the punch. :mrgreen: :p :mrgreen:


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KevC
Goldmember
Avatar
3,154 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: to
     
Jan 26, 2005 15:36 |  #12

So somebody tell me. Sigma 500DG Super or 420EX...


Too much gear...
take nothing but pictures .... kill nothing but time .... leave nothing but footprints

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Jan 26, 2005 15:48 as a reply to  @ KevC's post |  #13

KevC wrote:
So somebody tell me. Sigma 500DG Super or 420EX...

Sigma 500DG Super is more versatile, like the 550EX. I recommended it to my brother and I wouldn't have any reservations about adding it to my own 550EX and 420EX collection.


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
psychonaut
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
93 posts
Joined Jan 2005
     
Feb 06, 2005 17:40 as a reply to  @ PacAce's post |  #14

PacAce wrote:
Sigma 500DG Super is more versatile, like the 550EX. I recommended it to my brother and I wouldn't have any reservations about adding it to my own 550EX and 420EX collection.

so the alleged bugs on sigma arent too terrible ?

also what is the difference between "USA" and "Imported" versions of canon flashes that they have at phphotovideo ? i live in USA by the way.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KevC
Goldmember
Avatar
3,154 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: to
     
Feb 06, 2005 19:30 as a reply to  @ psychonaut's post |  #15

psychonaut wrote:
so the alleged bugs on sigma arent too terrible ?

also what is the difference between "USA" and "Imported" versions of canon flashes that they have at phphotovideo ? i live in USA by the way.

Warranty issues I believe. The "Imported" doesn't have the USA Warranty...


Too much gear...
take nothing but pictures .... kill nothing but time .... leave nothing but footprints

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,672 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Preliminary Flash Inquiry
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1975 guests, 103 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.