Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 31 Jul 2008 (Thursday) 09:32
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Spot meter stupidity

 
reneethomas
Demoted and banished by the TF
Avatar
3,051 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jul 2007
Location: In the land of Misfits NM
     
Jul 31, 2008 09:32 |  #1

Okay I am really confused and I am sorry for such a stupid question. Spot meters- are they used when using a flash or can it be used in natural lighting? I am getting frustrated being told my pictures look underexposed when my camera meter is reading correct exposure. However in looking up spot meters I keep ready about flash. Is there a model that is good for reading for just ambient light?

Thanks so much for the help!!


Racquel is my real name
Gear List Flickr (external link) BugGuide (external link)Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike
ugly when I'm sober
Avatar
15,398 posts
Gallery: 51 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 393
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Canterbury/Ramsgate, UK
     
Jul 31, 2008 09:50 |  #2

Spot meter - do you mean the one on the camera? That can be used in all lighting types.

Oh - I just re-read, you mean the hand-held meters. Never used one but they are also called incident light meters, I think.

Also, don't let the camera tell you that the exposure is correct. If you have a range of different tones the camera will take an average reading from across the scene. Best bet is to stick it in Manual and chimp until you are happy with your exposure and use the histogram to check that you are not clipping the highlights.


www.mikegreenphotograp​hy.co.uk (external link)
Gear
UK South Easterners
flickr (external link) Insta1 (external link) Insta2 (external link)

A closed mouth gathers no foot.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
yogestee
"my posts can be a little colourful"
Avatar
13,845 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 41
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Australia
     
Jul 31, 2008 10:10 as a reply to  @ Mike's post |  #3

In built camera meters are very easy to fool.. Usually strong backlighting is the main culprit.. If you meter for a subject which is strongly backlit and rely souly on your meter there is every chance your subject will be underexposed.. Experience will tell you to overexpose to what your meter tells you by 1 to 2 stops.. On the other side of the coin if you meter say an African-American skin tone against a black background your exposure will be overexposed by about 1-2 stops..

All meters are calibrated to read what is call 18% Reflectance Grey,, for all intents and purposes a midtone grey irrespective of what colour the subject is,, usually.. Strong reds can effect the metering..

Thats the advantage of shooting in Manual Mode and being able to guestimate where your meter should lie.. Spot meters are quite accurate where you meter exactly the subect.. Incident meters are even more accurate where you meter the light falling on the subject not the light thats being reflected.. Spot and Incident meters are both available in flash and available light meters.. Many of the topshelf models measure both..


Jurgen
50D~EOS M50 MkII~EOS M~G11~S95~GoPro Hero4 Silver
http://www.pbase.com/j​urgentreue (external link)
The Title Fairy,, off with her head!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chtgrubbs
Goldmember
1,675 posts
Joined Jul 2003
     
Jul 31, 2008 11:10 |  #4

Spotmeters measure a very small area (usually 1%) of the subject. They all measure continuous light, and newer models will read flash as well. They are the most difficult type of meter use properly. Usually several meter readings are made and careful calculations of correct exposure are made giving consideration to where on the range of light to dark the readings fall on. The classic exposure system which lends itself to the spotmeter is the Zone System.

If you need a handheld meter for general work then I would suggest an incident meter which measures the actual level of illumination rather than subject reflectance. Your biggest skill advancement would probably be to learn to use the histogram to check your exposure.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pprice
Goldmember
Avatar
1,714 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Gods Country (aka Mississippi)
     
Jul 31, 2008 17:25 |  #5

So, if you have a backlit subject and you use your cameras spot meter to take the light from the front of your subject (the darker area of the frame), this should give you the correct exposer for the whole sceen, or would it blow out the background?

Hope you dont mind me adding a question to your thread :) .


1D MKIII 16-35 2.8L MKII 24-70 2.8L 70-200 2.8L [COLOR=black]IS 300 2.8L IS (few others) Bunch of AB lighting
Southern by the grace of God

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
yogestee
"my posts can be a little colourful"
Avatar
13,845 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 41
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Australia
     
Jul 31, 2008 17:40 |  #6

pprice wrote in post #6022128 (external link)
So, if you have a backlit subject and you use your cameras spot meter to take the light from the front of your subject (the darker area of the frame), this should give you the correct exposer for the whole sceen, or would it blow out the background?

Hope you dont mind me adding a question to your thread :) .

Your background will blow out..


Jurgen
50D~EOS M50 MkII~EOS M~G11~S95~GoPro Hero4 Silver
http://www.pbase.com/j​urgentreue (external link)
The Title Fairy,, off with her head!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pprice
Goldmember
Avatar
1,714 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Gods Country (aka Mississippi)
     
Jul 31, 2008 18:52 |  #7

OK, in other words, read and figure it out pprice :) .


1D MKIII 16-35 2.8L MKII 24-70 2.8L 70-200 2.8L [COLOR=black]IS 300 2.8L IS (few others) Bunch of AB lighting
Southern by the grace of God

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Jul 31, 2008 20:08 |  #8

I am getting frustrated being told my pictures look underexposed when my camera meter is reading correct exposure.

See post #3
Tips for Xmas Ball Please


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike
ugly when I'm sober
Avatar
15,398 posts
Gallery: 51 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 393
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Canterbury/Ramsgate, UK
     
Aug 01, 2008 02:43 |  #9

pprice wrote in post #6022128 (external link)
So, if you have a backlit subject and you use your cameras spot meter to take the light from the front of your subject (the darker area of the frame), this should give you the correct exposer for the whole sceen, or would it blow out the background?

You will overexpose the background and blow the highlights. The thing to understand is that cameras cannot always expose for everything and you will often be sacrificing some element of the photo in order to capture the essential elements. This is especially the case with high contrast scenes, such as your backlit subject.

One way to get around this is to use fill in flash. Meter for the background and then add flash to illuminate your subject. It's not always going to work but it'll help to balance the exposure.


www.mikegreenphotograp​hy.co.uk (external link)
Gear
UK South Easterners
flickr (external link) Insta1 (external link) Insta2 (external link)

A closed mouth gathers no foot.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pprice
Goldmember
Avatar
1,714 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Gods Country (aka Mississippi)
     
Aug 01, 2008 03:45 |  #10

michaelgreen78 wrote in post #6024873 (external link)
You will overexpose the background and blow the highlights. The thing to understand is that cameras cannot always expose for everything and you will often be sacrificing some element of the photo in order to capture the essential elements. This is especially the case with high contrast scenes, such as your backlit subject.

One way to get around this is to use fill in flash. Meter for the background and then add flash to illuminate your subject. It's not always going to work but it'll help to balance the exposure.

That was a good answer!

Thanks!!

Oh, PhotosGuy, you have some great write-ups!!


1D MKIII 16-35 2.8L MKII 24-70 2.8L 70-200 2.8L [COLOR=black]IS 300 2.8L IS (few others) Bunch of AB lighting
Southern by the grace of God

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Aug 01, 2008 11:57 |  #11

reneethomas wrote in post #6019432 (external link)
Okay I am really confused and I am sorry for such a stupid question. Spot meters- are they used when using a flash or can it be used in natural lighting? I am getting frustrated being told my pictures look underexposed when my camera meter is reading correct exposure. However in looking up spot meters I keep ready about flash. Is there a model that is good for reading for just ambient light?

Thanks so much for the help!!

Do you have a sample picture of what you are talking about? Getting a spot meter may not necessarily fix your exposure problem. You need to first determine what the problem is and what's causing it before you can decide on how to fix it. :)


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lonnie
Goldmember
Avatar
1,606 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Southern Louisiana
     
Aug 02, 2008 02:52 |  #12

I've been reading 'Understanding Exposure' - the author recommends to walk or zoom in closer to your subject and take a reading from them, then recompose the shot, and use the settings from your reading. You could also use your exposure lock button.

Highlights will still be blown of course, this is just a way to ensure your meter is not fooled.


My YouTube Vlog: https://www.youtube.co​m/c/GarageFlips (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
poloman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,442 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Southern Illinois
     
Aug 02, 2008 09:56 |  #13

If you have the chance to determine the background, you can do a lot to influence the final product. If you are shooting candid, watching your background will still help.


"All those who believe in psychokinesis, raise my right hand!" Steven Wright

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Aug 03, 2008 10:19 |  #14

the author recommends to walk or zoom in closer to your subject and take a reading from them, then recompose the shot, and use the settings from your reading.

Or there's this info in the link I posted: Need an exposure crutch?


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
reneethomas
THREAD ­ STARTER
Demoted and banished by the TF
Avatar
3,051 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jul 2007
Location: In the land of Misfits NM
     
Aug 04, 2008 21:59 as a reply to  @ PhotosGuy's post |  #15

Here is one people commented on the exposure.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


It was a cloudy day after a rain and to me it looks like it did that day but people have commented on the exposure not being correct.

Racquel is my real name
Gear List Flickr (external link) BugGuide (external link)Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,464 views & 0 likes for this thread, 15 members have posted to it.
Spot meter stupidity
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2844 guests, 138 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.