I know there's no directional control if I don't stick anything on the end, but what would my results be?
Reason I'm asking is I have a gathering and I'd like to light the room itself if I choose to not use my 550s either on camera or off.
hawk911 Cream of the Crop More info | Jul 31, 2008 20:23 | #1 I know there's no directional control if I don't stick anything on the end, but what would my results be? HAWK Photography Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Rudi Goldmember 3,751 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2002 Location: Australia More info | Jul 31, 2008 20:49 | #2 Sure! Bare-bulb photography is popular with some wedding photogs. Try it, you might like it. • Wedding Photographer - Sydney and Wollongong
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TMRDesign Cream of the Crop 23,883 posts Likes: 12 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Huntington Station, NY More info | No reason why not Hawk. Be careful of flare and stray light entering the lens, but it's no different than pointing your Speedlight at the ceiling or wall and firing. Robert
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bieber Goldmember 1,992 posts Joined Dec 2006 Location: Bradenton, FL More info | Jul 31, 2008 21:37 | #4 Well, it's a little different, because there'll be direct as well as bounced light hitting things. Just think of it as lighting the room with a single table lamp. You're going to get rapid falloff in the area close to it, and more even (but much less) light farther away. No reason not to, though... EOS 20D w/ BG-E2 grip
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 31, 2008 21:39 | #5 it's a 90th birthday party so I'll give it a go. I'm somewhat concerned about the front of the unit, but I'll gorilla tape them down as best I can. I have caution tape too; overkill? HAWK Photography Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bieber Goldmember 1,992 posts Joined Dec 2006 Location: Bradenton, FL More info | Jul 31, 2008 22:40 | #6 Depends. If you want to see more direct light, angle it, or even point it towards your subject(s). If you want to see softer, more diffuse light reflected from the ceiling, point it straight up at the ceiling: put it in a corner as far from the subject(s) as possible, if you want to maximize diffuse and minimize direct lighting. EOS 20D w/ BG-E2 grip
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Lotto Goldmember 2,750 posts Likes: 192 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Southern California More info | Aug 01, 2008 03:04 | #7 I tried the bare bulb strobe couple times, found that the light straight from the flash tube is just too brutal for portraits, and cast ugly shadows on the wall even the strobe is point to the ceiling. The standard reflector comes with strobe does lot better job controlling the spills. 5D, 24-105L, 70-200L IS, 85mm Art, Godox
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 01, 2008 08:10 | #8 Lotto wrote in post #6024916 I tried the bare bulb strobe couple times, found that the light straight from the flash tube is just too brutal for portraits, and cast ugly shadows on the wall even the strobe is point to the ceiling. The standard reflector comes with strobe does lot better job controlling the spills. We don't get a standard reflector in the kit with the d4 or d2. I have to buy them, and they are $60 each and the umbrella is not included. HAWK Photography Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TMRDesign Cream of the Crop 23,883 posts Likes: 12 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Huntington Station, NY More info | You can always fashion some sort of shield, flag, gobo, cutter, etc.. to block or direct light. It's far from ideal but if you have no reflector then the answer to your original question is "yes you can" but it's not going to be easy or fun Robert
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 01, 2008 08:41 | #10 I figure I just need to place my order for the 3 additional D2 lights, and might as well piss the wife off more and put 2 or 3 reflectors in the bag also HAWK Photography Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TMRDesign Cream of the Crop 23,883 posts Likes: 12 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Huntington Station, NY More info | The reality is (and perhaps your wife will understand) that unless you're using softboxes the strobes are useless without reflectors. Robert
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 01, 2008 09:03 | #12 I've got my kit softboxes almost permanently attached, but I'd like the diversity of a reflector/umbrella combination. Her reality is the cost of all this gear. Lucky for me I've started to make some money on this "hobby" HAWK Photography Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TMRDesign Cream of the Crop 23,883 posts Likes: 12 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Huntington Station, NY More info | No doubt it's a money pit Hawk Robert
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Rudi Goldmember 3,751 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2002 Location: Australia More info | Aug 01, 2008 09:07 | #14 Both of those reflectors are brilliant, BTW. The 6.25" reflector is the best umbrella reflector I've used (I had some Bowens stuff some years back), and the "standard" 8.25" reflector is just as good! All the Elinchrom accessories are really well made and perform as advertised. • Wedding Photographer - Sydney and Wollongong
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 01, 2008 09:37 | #15 Rudi- what would you suggest I buy then for a versatile reflector/umbrella combo? HAWK Photography Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2726 guests, 150 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||