Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 31 Jul 2008 (Thursday) 21:21
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

sd card image erase--potentially harmful to cards?

 
stillwatergal
Senior Member
292 posts
Joined Jul 2008
     
Jul 31, 2008 21:21 |  #1

Hi,
I've been taught 2 apparently contradictory things re: erasing images v. reformatting cards. I was taught that: 1) it's fine to look at images on the back of the camera and erase anything you want as you go. I've also been taught that you NEVER EVER erase an image on a card--that you back up and load your images and then reformat the card to erase images. It was explained that doing it any other way could potentially corrupt the card or, at least, cause there to be problems with images. I'm inclined to "believe" --sort of intuitively-- that I should download the images and then reformat the card and should not erase images 1 at a time in camera. I'd like to know if I'm right and, if so, could someone please explain to me the WHY of it?
Thanks
Stephanie


Stephanie
5D3, 7D, Canon lenses: 24-105mm f4 L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS, 70-200mm f4 L IS, 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 EF-S, Kenko Pro 300 1.4X tc, Cotton Carrier, PS CS6, Lightroom 5.x, Epson Stylus Pro 3800

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GSansoucie
Senior Member
Avatar
788 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Southern Maine
     
Jul 31, 2008 21:50 |  #2

I see you are on a Mac. . .

Reformat the card in the camera. . .

If you "erase" or delete them on the mac they are simply moved to a hidden folder and take up just as much space.

Since switching from a PC, I've gotten into the habit of reformatting the card immediately after inserting it into the camera.


-=Glen=-
Flickr Stream (external link)
Check out my 2010 PaD (external link)
http://www.pbase.com/g​sansoucie (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
neil_g
Senior Member
Avatar
708 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2005
Location: South, UK
     
Aug 01, 2008 02:47 |  #3

not sure how deleting a file on a storage medium would cause corruption personally..


Burp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rellik
Senior Member
Avatar
720 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Aug 01, 2008 05:22 |  #4

Under normal reading/writing/deleti​ng of any files should not cause corruption of your images. Any "you should format each time" or "you should not fill up the card to the max" are just preventive measures. Sometimes, cards just go bad no matter what you do.


-Derek 40D, 5D, 5D MK II, 1D Mark III
35L, 50L, 85L, 17-40L, 24-70L, 24-105L, 70-200 F2.8L IS
Vancouver Wedding Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Aug 01, 2008 06:25 |  #5

Also, if all you do is delete files, especially one at a time, you leave a lot of other stuff on the card. Over time this will fill and fragment your card, increasing risks.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eelnoraa
Goldmember
1,798 posts
Likes: 37
Joined May 2007
     
Aug 01, 2008 19:48 as a reply to  @ Jon's post |  #6

Format or erasel all makes no different in flash memory operation. Deleting one file/picture is alittle different, but they are not the reason you get corrupted files.

When you format or erase all on storage flash memory, you actually do NOT delete any files. The file system simple remove the "pointers" to your file, or simple put, the file system mark the space as empty. When you write new files, the file system then erase the neccessary location and write the new file. This is why you can recover your file even after you delete them or format the card.

Deleting one file involve a slightly more complicated operation, but basic ideal is the same. The file is actually NOT deleted until its space is needed.

Now, with low level format, which usually requires special software, you can actually erase everything single location on a memory card.

eel


5Di, 5Diii, 28, 50, 85, 16-35II, 24-105, 70-200F2.8 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mackidbrendan
Senior Member
299 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Canada
     
Aug 01, 2008 20:42 |  #7

GSansoucie wrote in post #6023579 (external link)
If you "erase" or delete them on the mac they are simply moved to a hidden folder and take up just as much space.

i hate that!
especially with flash drives.
the "hidden folders" are put in the trash so as soon as you empty the trash ur stuff is gone.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JWright
Planes, trains and ham radio...
Avatar
18,399 posts
Likes: 35
Joined Dec 2004
     
Aug 01, 2008 22:53 as a reply to  @ mackidbrendan's post |  #8

I erase images from my cards all the time. If I don't like a shot or I trip the shutter accidentally, I'll delete the image from the card right then and there. Once I get the images uploaded to the computer I format the card in the camera. As of yet, I haven't had a card fail on me and I've been using the same cards since 2002.


John

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stillwatergal
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
292 posts
Joined Jul 2008
     
Aug 02, 2008 08:32 |  #9

Jon wrote in post #6025384 (external link)
Also, if all you do is delete files, especially one at a time, you leave a lot of other stuff on the card. Over time this will fill and fragment your card, increasing risks.

Thanks Jon...I think this is what I was trying to say. If I'm correctly understanding what you are saying, it seems as if one way to think about it is that it is sort of analogous to deleting files on a computer. Sooner or later you end up needing to run a defrag program which will recover space and compress unusable bits of space. The big difference is that you can't run a defrag program on a SDHC card. Is that more or less correct? If it's on the right track, here's the follow up question: how does low level format fit into the overall picture? My personal process is that I do a day's shooting and then take that card and download it to my computer or personal data storage device and verify that all is there. Then I format the card and every few formats I choose to do a low level format. I have absolutely no understanding of why I do the low level format or whether the process I use is good or not.
My original question was a poor attempt to try to understand the relationship between erasing single images in camera and then either reformatting or doing a low level format. Do I in anyway defrag the SDHC card by doing the low level reformat? I still don't quite "get it."
Thanks for the help
Stephanie


Stephanie
5D3, 7D, Canon lenses: 24-105mm f4 L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS, 70-200mm f4 L IS, 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 EF-S, Kenko Pro 300 1.4X tc, Cotton Carrier, PS CS6, Lightroom 5.x, Epson Stylus Pro 3800

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Aug 02, 2008 16:48 |  #10

Flash memory devices are somewhat less susceptible to fragmentation issues since they typically incorporate a "wear-leveling" algorithm so even if you're writing to sequential memory locations, you're not allways writing over the same part of the card. However, if you have a bunch of directories, especially, left over due to deleting photos one-by-one, you make things somewhat more difficult for the algorithm.

AFAIK, a "basic" format of a flash device wipes the file allocation table and root directory; a low level format of an SD-type card (not an optional choice for CF cards) also verifies the rest of the card. So either operation will leave you with a shiny fresh card as far as your camera's concerned. A low-level format, however, will let the camera or computer mark out newly-bad sectors so you don't try to write to them.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tdragone
Goldmember
Avatar
2,190 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2004
Location: San Diego, California
     
Aug 03, 2008 11:07 |  #11

Jon's got it right with the algorithm.
Every day I deal with linear and ATA PCMCIA cards and CF cards.
When writing to these types of solid state media; the writing is not sequential sector by sector order.

There is a controller in the memory card that directs the data to random sectors to spread out the wear on the card. Defragging a solid state card renders this process useless.


-Tom Dragonetti
Spyder Holster + R5 with EF->RF adapter, 1Dmk IV, 50D, G11
10-22, 16-35 2.8Lii, , 24-70 2.8Lii, 50mm 1.4,
70-200 2.8Lii IS, 100-400L IS
1.4x TC, 580EX ii, ST-E2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stillwatergal
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
292 posts
Joined Jul 2008
     
Aug 03, 2008 16:49 |  #12

thanks all...
Stephanie


Stephanie
5D3, 7D, Canon lenses: 24-105mm f4 L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS, 70-200mm f4 L IS, 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 EF-S, Kenko Pro 300 1.4X tc, Cotton Carrier, PS CS6, Lightroom 5.x, Epson Stylus Pro 3800

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,788 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
sd card image erase--potentially harmful to cards?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2848 guests, 162 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.