Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 03 Aug 2008 (Sunday) 21:11
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Wood Duck Image

 
rathke
Senior Member
Avatar
962 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Humble, TX
     
Aug 03, 2008 21:11 |  #1

This is an older image I found using my new LR to process. I tried cropping to meet the rule of thirds but then lost the "plowing forward" look. I know that subject in the middle is bad but any ideas?


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


_______________
Ron www.rathkephotography.​com (external link)
Houston Wedding Photography
Humble-Kingwood Senior Portraits

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bangtwister
Member
Avatar
163 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Hampshire, UK
     
Aug 03, 2008 21:28 |  #2

I like the colours in the Ducks face and the colour of the water. Does the refelection of the ducks face in the water exist in the uncropped picture? Anyway i like it. Well done.


Canon 7D, Canon 400D, Canon G10, Canon G5X, Canon 24 - 70 lens, Canon 50 1.8 lens, Canon 1.4, Tamron 18 - 270, Canon 100mm Macro, Canon 10 - 22 Wide angle, Canon 90 - 300mm, Sigma 24 - 200 2.8, Canon 430EX Speedlight MK 2. Photoshop Elements 12, Lightroom 5, LR Time-lapse 4.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Boehme
Enjoy being spanked
Avatar
7,359 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 89
Joined Jan 2007
Location: DFW Metro-mess, Texas
     
Aug 04, 2008 01:34 as a reply to  @ Bangtwister's post |  #3

Don't let an arbitrary "rule" constrain your editing and prevent you from doing what you really want to do. It really isn't a rule anyway -- it's more like a sensible guideline to be applied as you see fit. It is a good idea to keep it in the back of your mind when looking at ways to compose a shot. However, shots of wildlife are considerably different than posed portraits and landscape images in that you typically have to grab the best shot that you can while you have the chance. During post processing, you can use your own eye to decide what is the best composure.


Atmospheric haze in images? Click for Tutorial to Reduce Atmospheric Haze with Photoshop.
Gear List .... Gallery: Woodturner Bill (external link)
Donate to Support POTN Operating Costs

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chauncey
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,696 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 467
Joined Jun 2007
Location: MI/CO
     
Aug 04, 2008 09:55 as a reply to  @ Bill Boehme's post |  #4

Want to see the head reflection.


The things you do for yourself die with you, the things you do for others live forever.
A man's worth should be judged, not when he basks in the sun, but how he faces the storm.

My stuff...http://1x.com/member/c​hauncey43 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rathke
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
962 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Humble, TX
     
Aug 04, 2008 11:06 as a reply to  @ chauncey's post |  #5

Thanks for your response and comments. This image is not cropped at all therefore no head relection exists. I guess this capture was taken to late as he was coming toward me. I thought of cropping below his belly since the neck reflection leads to "no head".


_______________
Ron www.rathkephotography.​com (external link)
Houston Wedding Photography
Humble-Kingwood Senior Portraits

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Boehme
Enjoy being spanked
Avatar
7,359 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 89
Joined Jan 2007
Location: DFW Metro-mess, Texas
     
Aug 04, 2008 16:54 |  #6

rathke wrote in post #6044107 (external link)
Thanks for your response and comments. This image is not cropped at all therefore no head relection exists. I guess this capture was taken to late as he was coming toward me. I thought of cropping below his belly since the neck reflection leads to "no head".

Was this done at a local pond in Arlington? There used to be lots of wood ducks in Pappy Elkins Lake which is just a short walk from where I live, but I have not seen any there this year.


Atmospheric haze in images? Click for Tutorial to Reduce Atmospheric Haze with Photoshop.
Gear List .... Gallery: Woodturner Bill (external link)
Donate to Support POTN Operating Costs

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rathke
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
962 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Humble, TX
     
Aug 04, 2008 17:38 as a reply to  @ Bill Boehme's post |  #7

Bill, This was at the Japanese Botanical Gardens in Fort Worth.


_______________
Ron www.rathkephotography.​com (external link)
Houston Wedding Photography
Humble-Kingwood Senior Portraits

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
midnitejam
Senior Member
806 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Parma Ohio
     
Aug 04, 2008 18:56 |  #8

bill boehme wrote in post #6042127 (external link)
Don't let an arbitrary "rule" constrain your editing and prevent you from doing what you really want to do. It really isn't a rule anyway -- it's more like a sensible guideline to be applied as you see fit. It is a good idea to keep it in the back of your mind when looking at ways to compose a shot. However, shots of wildlife are considerably different than posed portraits and landscape images in that you typically have to grab the best shot that you can while you have the chance. During post processing, you can use your own eye to decide what is the best composure.

I absolutely agree. Sometimes the rule-of-thirds advocaters will mention the centralization issue only when no other issues can be found.

Actually, in this particular instance, the duck's eye is at the upper 1/3 horizontal and the wake begins at the lower 1/3 horizontal. Maybe the centered wake is a good thing here. The main elements for consideration with me are the focus, exposure, and color.

I think this is a very interesting shot. I like it even with the reflection ruined by the crop.


Midnitejam--The happiness in your life depends on the quality of your thoughts.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rathke
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
962 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Humble, TX
     
Aug 04, 2008 20:46 as a reply to  @ midnitejam's post |  #9

The original post was uncropped. I must have misled you with my mentioning a crop which I never did. This one is cropped to remove the neck reflection which seems to be a distraction. (I think it is). Thanks to all for the comments which helps alot!:lol:


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


_______________
Ron www.rathkephotography.​com (external link)
Houston Wedding Photography
Humble-Kingwood Senior Portraits

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CameraBuff
Goldmember
Avatar
2,862 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 70
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Illinois
     
Aug 05, 2008 17:56 as a reply to  @ rathke's post |  #10

I feel the head reflection would of made it outstanding; however, the croped image with less reflection to distract still makes it an excellent photo! Great colors and detail!


Sony A7r, Sony 16-35 f4, Canon 1d3, Canon 70-200 f4L, Sigma 150-600 contemporary, G1X, Lee filter holder and gnd's, Singh-Ray reverse gnd
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
midnitejam
Senior Member
806 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Parma Ohio
     
Aug 05, 2008 18:43 as a reply to  @ CameraBuff's post |  #11

I like this comp much better than your original.

I'm having difficulty trying to imagine a workable composition that would include the reflection of the head.


Midnitejam--The happiness in your life depends on the quality of your thoughts.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,075 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Wood Duck Image
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2705 guests, 166 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.