Quarter Moon Over False Creek - And a Question

What I saw Chris was that every square and rectangle could stand alone as a photo..dang.lol.did I read it wrong...'cuz ratios and me.not going to happen..:p

Flo wrote in post #6057722
What I saw Chris was that every square and rectangle could stand alone as a photo..dang.lol.did I read it wrong...'cuz ratios and me.not going to happen..:p

Yeah, the hard part with the ratio is getting a printer to actually print a photo that size

For further clarification on the ratio: A "perfect rectangle" with the ratio of 1:1.618 can be divided into a perfect square, and another perfect rectangle. Lather, Rince, Repeat.

Unfortunately it makes print sizes close too: 4x6.5, 5x8, 8x13. These are not standard for any printer or frame so I'm not entirely sure on how useful they would be unless you add a boarder to your prints to fill out the standard sizes.

FlyingPhotog wrote in post #6055284
I went with even more "Pano-esque"

I love all the elements, the colors and the mood. It says nice, peaceful summer evening but for some reason, something just doesn't gel...

Now THAT I like.

Now is there a difference between what we're calling the "Golden Ratio" and what I've seen referred to as the "Golden Mean?"