16U Softball w/300 2.8

Great set of photos. I really liked them all.

Very nice series!!!!! I'm digging these. Nice job!

Solid work Matt, great shots. I shoot with the Mk III and 300 2.8, combo as well, also I just bought the sigma 120-300 for the zoom, trying to see if that was a waste of money or not.

I really want the 400 2.8, mmmm..nice.

Now, help me get a membership to SportsShooter!...LOL..

All very good but 2, 3 and 8 are stellar...

(Really didn't need to see any more 300 f/2.8 stuff...my wallet's whining again...)

Thanks again. The 400 and 200 are on my short list. I figure it will be the 200 due to covering ice skating and performances a lot. I also rarley cover older kids (or adults) so the 400 is too much in a lot of cases.

I worked for over a year to get accepted to SportsShooter. I had a lot of help in this forum. Variety, Sharpness and Timing are what I learned was the most important as far as getting accepted.

Great Images

eigga wrote in post #6059388
Thanks again. The 400 and 200 are on my short list. I figure it will be the 200 due to covering ice skating and performances a lot. I also rarley cover older kids (or adults) so the 400 is too much in a lot of cases.

I worked for over a year to get accepted to SportsShooter. I had a lot of help in this forum. Variety, Sharpness and Timing are what I learned was the most important as far as getting accepted.

Yeah, my biggest problem getting accepted is finding someone to sponsor me for it. I really dont know anyone thats a member already.

some of the best girls softball I've seen in this forum. Congrats.

liam5100 wrote in post #6060366
Yeah, my biggest problem getting accepted is finding someone to sponsor me for it. I really dont know anyone thats a member already.

you don't need a sponsor from what I remember.

That is correct. Getting accepted without a sponsor is more difficult but possible. That is what I did.

Again I appreciate the comments.