Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 06 Aug 2008 (Wednesday) 10:23
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

AF settings for Reception Shots

 
Keithaba
Member
211 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
     
Aug 06, 2008 10:23 |  #1

I am fooling around with settings, and noticed i got a lot of blurry shots at my last wedding shoot (just shooting not hired).

A lot of them seem to be pure shutterspeed. Action blurr...

But some of the shots it seemed like I missed the point of focus. For reception, I go with AI servo, because people are usually moving.

On portriats, or when people aren't moving fast, I will usually use the center focus, and that way, if I want to crop later to make the frame look nicer, no big deal. At least their face is in focus. I find it hard to frame a shot during a reception, because people are moving quick, and I like candids.

Is it preferred to allow the camera to pick the point for AF rather than a preset one during these type of in the moment shots?

I don't fully understand how the AF picks the spot for focus in a frame.


40D \ 350D \ 17-55 2.8 \ 70-300 IS \ 60mm 2.8 macro \ 28-135 IS \ Tamron 28-75 2.8 \ 580 EXII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike
ugly when I'm sober
Avatar
15,398 posts
Gallery: 51 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 393
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Canterbury/Ramsgate, UK
     
Aug 06, 2008 11:40 |  #2

I use 1 AF point only and always select it myself. Letting the camera decide what to focus on at a wedding reception is useless. The AF point I use will depend upon the placement of the subject and it takes very little time to change the AF point. I also only ever use single shot AF.

Your blurred shots is probably due to a too slow shutter speed. Don't be afraid to push up your iso to get the shutter speed you need.


www.mikegreenphotograp​hy.co.uk (external link)
Gear
UK South Easterners
flickr (external link) Insta1 (external link) Insta2 (external link)

A closed mouth gathers no foot.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
egordon99
Cream of the Crop
10,247 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philly 'burbs
     
Aug 06, 2008 13:40 as a reply to  @ Mike's post |  #3

Don't use "Auto select AF point". You might as well just tell the camera to "auto compose" your shots :lol:

Practice selecting the AF point you need for each shot. It is very easy with the 40D's "joystick" on the back.

As for shutter speed, if you are using a flash (which you should be if you want good pictures in a room with crummy lighting), shutter speed doesn't matter (well it does, to expose the ambient background) as flash will freeze most motion.

Here's a good starting point - Camera in Manual, Flash in E-TTL with FEC set to +1 (or +2/3), bounce, ISO200, 1/250s, f/4. To give flash more "power", you can increase the ISO and/or aperture. To allow more ambient light in, use a slower shutter speed and/or higher ISO.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Aug 06, 2008 18:13 |  #4

I use one shot focus mode with the centre focus point for 99.8% of my shots on a wedding day. The only time I use anything else is when i'm using F2 or F1.4, the subject is off centre, and I want the eyes to be sharp.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Aug 06, 2008 18:15 |  #5

egordon99 wrote in post #6058427 (external link)
Here's a good starting point - Camera in Manual, Flash in E-TTL with FEC set to +1 (or +2/3), bounce, ISO200, 1/250s, f/4. To give flash more "power", you can increase the ISO and/or aperture. To allow more ambient light in, use a slower shutter speed and/or higher ISO.

These settings will make the flash a LOT brighter than a typical reception, so the background will be black. My suggested settings would be ISO1600, F2.8, 1/50th - 1/100th. These shots are rarely printed very large, and a well exposed ISO1600 prints fine with little significant noise up to maybe 12 or 15 inches in my experience.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
egordon99
Cream of the Crop
10,247 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philly 'burbs
     
Aug 06, 2008 20:03 as a reply to  @ tim's post |  #6

Listen to Tim, I'm sure he has alot more experience than me as I'm just starting out :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Aug 06, 2008 20:10 |  #7

egordon99 wrote in post #6060369 (external link)
Listen to Tim, I'm sure he has alot more experience than me as I'm just starting out :)

I've photographed somewhere between 70 and 100 weddings, I lost count a while ago.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Keithaba
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
211 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
     
Aug 07, 2008 07:21 |  #8

tim wrote in post #6059836 (external link)
These settings will make the flash a LOT brighter than a typical reception, so the background will be black. My suggested settings would be ISO1600, F2.8, 1/50th - 1/100th. These shots are rarely printed very large, and a well exposed ISO1600 prints fine with little significant noise up to maybe 12 or 15 inches in my experience.

Tim: Are those settings sans flash? Seems like that would be very bright with the 580 exII without dialing down the flash a few stops.

Thanks for answers about AF settings!


40D \ 350D \ 17-55 2.8 \ 70-300 IS \ 60mm 2.8 macro \ 28-135 IS \ Tamron 28-75 2.8 \ 580 EXII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Aug 07, 2008 08:44 |  #9

Practice selecting the AF point you need for each shot. It is very easy with the 40D's "joystick" on the back.

20D: If you switch your camera to Custom Function 13-1 to put point selection on the Multicontroller (Joystick), life with AI Servo becomes a lot easier. It only takes a fraction of a second to set the point you need.


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tdodd
Goldmember
Avatar
3,733 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Essex, UK
     
Aug 07, 2008 09:17 |  #10

PhotosGuy wrote in post #6063316 (external link)
20D: If you switch your camera to Custom Function 13-1 to put point selection on the Multicontroller (Joystick), life with AI Servo becomes a lot easier. It only takes a fraction of a second to set the point you need.

True, but as I understand it, with AI Servo the flash system will not make use of lens focus distance information to assist in making flash exposure calculations. Also, if conditions are really grotty the focus assist beam will not be enabled and maybe the camera will struggle with focusing. Neither one is a showstopper but just something to consider.

However, if you're bouncing your flash then the AF distance data is moot, I think, and if you are pointing the flash directly but have some sort of softbox or other modifier fitted then the AF distance data could actually be misleading for the flash exposure calculation. Perhaps AI Servo is the better choice after all :)

Hopefully someone will confirm what I've said or correct me if I'm wrong.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Aug 07, 2008 16:42 |  #11

Keithaba wrote in post #6062992 (external link)
Tim: Are those settings sans flash? Seems like that would be very bright with the 580 exII without dialing down the flash a few stops.

That's with a speedlite with FEC set to expose the subject properly. Of course some times you'll have plenty of light and you can change the setttings, I aim to have the background one stop below the subject. Often those settings still won't give you a good exposure, which is where room lighting with multiple flash units comes in handy.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,343 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
AF settings for Reception Shots
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2936 guests, 133 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.