Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 06 Aug 2008 (Wednesday) 10:42
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Raw or Jpeg

 
doctorgonzo
Member
Avatar
217 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Minneapolis, MN
     
Aug 06, 2008 11:49 as a reply to  @ post 6057745 |  #16

I'm a bit of a programmer and I've been following the articles too, and so I do believe what some of them claim! A good rundown of myths and facts is here (external link).

But agreed, JPEG is not the best format for long-term archiving, especially if you plan on doing any retouching/editing in the future. Best to use some kind of uncompressed format.


Canon 40D Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Canon EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM — Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 — Canon Speedlite 430EX II A long B&H wish list!
http://www.nathanhunst​ad.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Aug 06, 2008 11:55 |  #17

Anecdotally--

Since RAW shooting was one of my main reasons for moving to DSLRs, it's been a while since I've shot in jpeg.

Recently, though, I've been doing a lot of sports shooting, following the kiteboarding sport around the Pacific Northwest.

So, on an impulse I decided one day to do a short shoot shooting RAW+jpeg -- about 300 shots, so ~600 images to deal with.

I wish I hadn't...I found myself ignoring the jpegs, but when I'd do a batch operation such as a white balance adjustment half of my shots (the jpegs) would be out of whack, and were cluttering my workspace, and are a hassle to delete.

So, if you want to work with RAW, prepare yourself to be spoiled!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Phil ­ Light
"manly fragrance,.. involuntarily celibate"
Avatar
2,218 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Indianapolis, IN
     
Aug 06, 2008 12:00 |  #18

Tony, I found the same thing to be true for me.

One more thing if it hasn't been said already, raw edits are non-destructive, even crops. You can go back to the original file at any time as long as it still exists.


Please disregard all opinions in this post
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
canonloader
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
52,911 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 135
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Behind A Camera
     
Aug 06, 2008 12:09 |  #19

raw edits are non-destructive, even crops

Well, essentially, you can not edit a RAW file, only the jpg the RAW editor puts on the screen as a preview. Your editing the preview and not the actual RAW file and all the settings are saved in the .xmp files.

But I also agree with Tony. I started out shooting jpg, then went to RAW. A year later, I got CS3 and saw I could edit a jpg in the RAW editor interface. So I went back to shooting jpg only, for one month. I will never try that again. At first, things seemed OK, but then it slowly dawned on me that there was just something missing from the jpg files themselves. Maybe that 14bit RAW from the 40D was only a 12bit jpg, but it was something you could see after being use to RAW. ;)


Mitch- ____...^.^...____
Gear List, My You Tube (external link)
War is not about who's right, it's about who's left.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SOT
I make up stuff about Cameras
915 posts
Joined Oct 2007
     
Aug 06, 2008 12:12 |  #20

I agree for some quick and dirty stuff, jpeg is fine (like newspaper/paps) but for most everything else that you might care about a lot, RAW is the answer.


http://img81.imageshac​k.us/img81/8646/captur​e1o.jpg (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,424 views & 0 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it.
Raw or Jpeg
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2844 guests, 138 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.