gjman wrote in post #6410025
You need to look into the 3 lb "netbook" line up like Acer One and Asus 1000HA (along with MSI Wind and Dell Mini Precision). With a 6 cell battery (that's about 6 hours of realistic use, vs the 7.5 hours claimed) and 2 lb weight you can pretty much use with with one hand. And with a 9 to 10 in 1024 x 600 display and the option to load PS CS2 and WiFi and 160GB HDD all for under $500 its a lot better option than an Epson. Sure you need to get a USB CF card reader but these sub-notebooks are lot more useful than an overpriced Epsons.
I understand the economical approach of a notebook, but if you got the money and don't have the time, Epson is the way to go.
I have a <5lb notebook and I still got the Epson. It works so much better for travel, is more ergonomic, and can take more abuse. Epsons are overpriced for a reason. They are not just a cardread/hardrive/viewer. There are a lot of other ones on the market that are cheaper that do that. Their screen although not very high res is very high gamut. Unlike your notebook your data is more secure on the Epson. The new 7000 is fast (21MP RAW files are no match). I have a lot of equipment and don't need to be fooling around with a notebook, cables, plugin readers when I have serious work to do. I even have 14 8GB cards and still have the Epson. I like to have 2 copies of stuff when I'm on the road and have lost data to notebooks before. Yes I even sent the drive away to one of those places to get the data recovered. no luck. Of course I've lost data on my Epson P-2000 too, it didn't like a card that starting getting errors, but I still had the card and recovered the data. When your being paid to get a once in a lifetime event recorded or paying big bucks to travel to exotic places to take shots, the price of the Epson doesn't seem so much.