Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 07 Aug 2008 (Thursday) 14:52
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

How much strobe power do I need?

 
Phil ­ Light
"manly fragrance,.. involuntarily celibate"
Avatar
2,218 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Indianapolis, IN
     
Aug 07, 2008 14:52 |  #1

I'm having a hard time getting my head around all I read regarding strobe power. Example, quantifying the light output, i.e., watt seconds. It seems like having more light available would always be better, but what is enough? What is not enough? In a small studio I would imagine that I could get away with 160was and probably be fine. What if I wanted to take strobes outside, or to something like a gym and shoot a basketball game... 1000ws minimum? Or would 320ws serve the purpose? Is there a site that lists what amount of power is recommended for different situations? Anyone have lots of experience with this?

I've been warned that subjective questions like this make it difficult to answer but I'm really just looking for some plain common sense advice.


Please disregard all opinions in this post
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jr_senator
Goldmember
Avatar
4,861 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Aug 07, 2008 15:28 |  #2

320ws is not a strong light. Even in a small studio 160ws is weak, at least for a main light, I'd be surprised if you were allowed to place truly strong lighting on a basketball game.The players might object.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kittygraphix
Goldmember
Avatar
1,199 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: New Orleans, LA
     
Aug 07, 2008 15:31 |  #3

Get yourself two 400's that way if one isn't enough you always have a second, and if two is too much you can pull one back. That's what I plan on starting out with when I get lighting :D Great for studio lighting and outdoor use :D


~Kat
Gear: continually growing and changing!!!!
http://kittygraphix.sm​ugmug.com/ (external link) http://www.modelmayhem​.com/749345 (external link) http://myspace.com/kit​tygraphix (external link) ittygraphix@yahoo.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
airfrogusmc
I'm a chimper. There I said it...
37,960 posts
Gallery: 179 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 13403
Joined May 2007
Location: Oak Park, Illinois
     
Aug 07, 2008 15:41 as a reply to  @ Kittygraphix's post |  #4

Just depends on what you're doing. If your shooting L/F product then you can never have enough power. For that speedotron blackline 4803s.

Single and couple portraits then ya really don't need allot, groups ya need more. I have white lightning 1200s and for single and couples they're over kill but its nice to have the juice when doing groups.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pcunite
Goldmember
Avatar
1,481 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Apr 2007
     
Aug 07, 2008 16:53 |  #5

Phil Light wrote in post #6065422 (external link)
I'm having a hard time getting my head around all I read regarding strobe power.

I will help you out...

The very first thing you need to know before you go down this path is the following:

1. Desired ISO, aperture, and subject distance (lights from subject distance) you want to shoot at.

2. Desired modifiers (60" umbrella, 50x50 softboxes, 8ft octaboxes)

3. Will you be shooting outside?

Work very hard at figuring out #1 above or we can't help you. But to give you something to chew on I will make an assumption.

** ISO 100, f8, and lights 15 feet from subject indoor studio using two 60" umbrellas and one bare kicker **

Ok that is what your going to be doing... okay I can offer you the following advice. Get two AlienBee B800 and one AlienBee B400.

Next question! :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Phil ­ Light
THREAD ­ STARTER
"manly fragrance,.. involuntarily celibate"
Avatar
2,218 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Indianapolis, IN
     
Aug 07, 2008 17:21 |  #6

pcunite wrote in post #6066112 (external link)
...The very first thing you need to know before you go down this path is the following:

1. Desired ISO, aperture, and subject distance (lights from subject distance) you want to shoot at...

I appreciate the responses so far. My primary concern is lighting a gym during a game, not studio. I know if I decide to do studio work I can always dial the light down so I'm not really concerned about the low end. I'm just wondering if someone has experience with this. This actually might have been a good question to post in the sports section. Anyway, here's what I'm thinking:

a. ISO - Of course my preference would be 100 but that's not realistic. I'd prefer not to go above 400 though if possible.

b. Aperture - f/2.8 - f/5.6 typically

c. Subject distance - Tricky one. All gyms are different. On average the light will probably have to be 25 - 40 feet from the players and most likely bounced off the ceiling to avoid blinding a player who might happen to be looking in that direction. And yes, sports shooters use strobes in gyms all the time. It's generally up to the coach or AD as to whether that's allowed.

.... 2. Desired modifiers (60" umbrella, 50x50 softboxes, 8ft octaboxes)...

Just a simple reflector. No reason for modifiers for this

....3. Will you be shooting outside?...

Very possibly

....** ISO 100, f8, and lights 15 feet from subject indoor studio using two 60" umbrellas and one bare kicker **

Ok that is what your going to be doing... okay I can offer you the following advice. Get two AlienBee B800 and one AlienBee B400.

Next question! :)

No, not really. That's not at all what I'll be doing. I've looked at the AlienBee systems and they seem underpowered for the price. The colors are nice though. :D


Please disregard all opinions in this post
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
Aug 07, 2008 17:45 |  #7

jr_senator wrote in post #6065627 (external link)
320ws is not a strong light. Even in a small studio 160ws is weak, at least for a main light, I'd be surprised if you were allowed to place truly strong lighting on a basketball game.The players might object.

This is a blanket statement that I don't find to be true at all. I own a full functioning small studio and 320ws was too much power for my main and other subject area lighting. It let me shoot from f/5.6 to f/16 but without using gels or ND's I could never shoot at f/4, much less f/2.8.

I use 200ws strobes and find them to work very nicely and 160ws would also do the job well.

In small studios we don't tend to spread out and have out main light 8 or 10 feet from the subject. So when we want a large soft light source and isolation from the background we place the main light source 2 or 3 feet from the subject. With too much power it's very limiting.


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jr_senator
Goldmember
Avatar
4,861 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Aug 07, 2008 18:28 |  #8

TMR Design wrote in post #6066379 (external link)
This is a blanket statement that I don't find to be true at all. I own a full functioning small studio and 320ws was too much power for my main and other subject area lighting. It let me shoot from f/5.6 to f/16 but without using gels or ND's I could never shoot at f/4, much less f/2.8.

I use 200ws strobes and find them to work very nicely and 160ws would also do the job well.

In small studios we don't tend to spread out and have out main light 8 or 10 feet from the subject. So when we want a large soft light source and isolation from the background we place the main light source 2 or 3 feet from the subject. With too much power it's very limiting.

I must admit I don't recall taking a portrait where the main lighting was 2-3' from the subject and I'm not sure this is common practice. I would consider my studio area small but the lighting is 7-10 (sometimes 12) feet away from the subject. I don't know what kind of lights you have but evidently you can't adjust the output.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,437 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4528
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Aug 07, 2008 18:36 |  #9

I agree with Robert, sometimes 160 w-s can be too much! Let Alien Bee web site be your guide...B400 unit has 160 w-s true rating. According to Buff, with 7" reflector it has f/11 + 0.2EV @ 10' or a Guide Number of about 120; f/4 reaches to 30'. In a studio, you would shoot at about 10' at most, forcing f/11 + 0.2EV. Dialed down to minimum power, the B400 still requires f/2.8 from a single light at a distance that assumes a roomy shooting area!
If you shoot at ISO 1600 on the Basketball court, the GN becomes 480; f/4 reaches to 120' with the 160 w-s B400 (actually a bit less because of high ceilings etc. that reduce the effective power output from manufacturer's rating!


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
Aug 07, 2008 18:40 |  #10

jr_senator wrote in post #6066590 (external link)
I must admit I don't recall taking a portrait where the main lighting was 2-3' from the subject and I'm not sure this is common practice. I would consider my studio area small but the lighting is 7-10 (sometimes 12) feet away from the subject. I don't know what kind of lights you have but evidently you can't adjust the output.

More common than I think you realize. If you've got a small softbox and place it 6 feet from your subject you've got a small light source, small catch lights, harder light with more contrast.

It's extremely common to work with modifiers that close to the subject, and it's not just for those with small studios. Many pros will work with a diffusion panel as close to the subject as possible without being in frame. Sometimes that's as close at 20- 24 inches.


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ueb0258
Senior Member
498 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Nashvegas
     
Aug 07, 2008 19:20 |  #11

I have to agree with Robert. I have 320's and 600's and the 320's I have a hard time getting down to 4 and 2.8 when I want to. I tend to keep my lights closer so I have a softer larger light source. Most of the time within 4 to 6 feet from the subject.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
Aug 07, 2008 19:49 as a reply to  @ ueb0258's post |  #12

Hey Jeff,

If you want to get some idea of what kind of power will do what for you take a look at the specs of some strobes and you'll see that they typically will detail the output with an f stop, shutter speed, ISO and distance to subject. A little math will then give you other distances and values.


For example, take a look at this 1200ws strobe and click on the Specifications tab.

http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …Digital_Style_1​200RX.html (external link)


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Phil ­ Light
THREAD ­ STARTER
"manly fragrance,.. involuntarily celibate"
Avatar
2,218 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Indianapolis, IN
     
Aug 07, 2008 20:06 |  #13

Ok, good.

Guide Number F-128.1 @ 3.3' @ISO 100, 1/250, with 48° Reflector

Let’s say then the strobe is mounted to a rail on the second floor on the side of the gym, several feet off the side of the floor, pointed at the ceiling. Assume there is ~15 feet to the ceiling and ~35 feet back to the floor where the subject is. So, 50 feet total distance, right? And for the sake of argument let's assume the ceiling is adequately reflective.

You're the engineer. ;) You're gonna have to help me with the math here. I'm not sure where to start. :o


Please disregard all opinions in this post
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sfaust
Goldmember
Avatar
2,306 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2006
     
Aug 07, 2008 20:54 |  #14

Phil Light wrote in post #6065422 (external link)
I'm having a hard time getting my head around all I read regarding strobe power...

After seeing your avatar, I think I know what your problem is....


:lol::lol:


Stephen

Mix of digital still gear, Medium format to M4/3.
Canon EOS Cinema for video.
Commercial Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Phil ­ Light
THREAD ­ STARTER
"manly fragrance,.. involuntarily celibate"
Avatar
2,218 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Indianapolis, IN
     
Aug 07, 2008 20:57 |  #15

sfaust wrote in post #6067392 (external link)
After seeing your avatar, I think I know what your problem is....

:lol::lol:

You'd think you would just pop that back plate off and cram it in there wouldn't you? :lol::lol:

(Wise-a$$) :p


Please disregard all opinions in this post
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,083 views & 0 likes for this thread, 18 members have posted to it.
How much strobe power do I need?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
1633 guests, 144 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.