(I think I finally stumped Robert) 
PhilLight THREAD STARTER "manly fragrance,.. involuntarily celibate" 2,218 posts Likes: 21 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Indianapolis, IN More info | Aug 07, 2008 20:58 | #16 (I think I finally stumped Robert) Please disregard all opinions in this post
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TMRDesign Cream of the Crop 23,883 posts Likes: 12 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Huntington Station, NY More info | Aug 07, 2008 21:07 | #17 No Jeff, Robert
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhilLight THREAD STARTER "manly fragrance,.. involuntarily celibate" 2,218 posts Likes: 21 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Indianapolis, IN More info | Aug 07, 2008 21:19 | #18 I think that's finally what I needed to know. That tells me that 1200ws would give me more than what I need. Assuming I would probably use something probably between f/2.8 - f/5.6, and I would not be opposed to shooting as high as 400 ISO. Then I could dial the power down and get a faster recycle time too. Please disregard all opinions in this post
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TMRDesign Cream of the Crop 23,883 posts Likes: 12 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Huntington Station, NY More info |
airfrogusmc I'm a chimper. There I said it... More info | Aug 07, 2008 22:47 | #20 jr_senator wrote in post #6066590 I must admit I don't recall taking a portrait where the main lighting was 2-3' from the subject and I'm not sure this is common practice. I would consider my studio area small but the lighting is 7-10 (sometimes 12) feet away from the subject. I don't know what kind of lights you have but evidently you can't adjust the output. Almost every single subject portrait that light is no farther than 3 ft away from subject. Quality of light is very important to me and usually with one person my softbox is just outta the view of the lens a B/G light and reflector for fill. But the quality is what I get first then dial in desired f/stop.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sfaust Goldmember 2,306 posts Likes: 10 Joined Nov 2006 More info | Aug 08, 2008 07:08 | #21 Phil Light wrote in post #6067407 You'd think you would just pop that back plate off and cram it in there wouldn't you? ![]() ![]() (Wise-a$$) ![]() You're right. I forgot about the backplate and the 128 pin computer link connector hidden behind it. I would image you can download every piece of photographic knowledge in about 32 seconds. Stephen
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhilLight THREAD STARTER "manly fragrance,.. involuntarily celibate" 2,218 posts Likes: 21 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Indianapolis, IN More info | Aug 08, 2008 07:18 | #22 sfaust wrote in post #6069621 You're right. I forgot about the backplate and the 128 pin computer link connector hidden behind it. I would image you can download every piece of photographic knowledge in about 32 seconds. But the first accident, well, its all wiped out ![]() I'm sorry, what were we talking about? (I have a headache) Please disregard all opinions in this post
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AB8ND Senior Member 745 posts Likes: 3 Joined Dec 2006 Location: Grand Rapids, MI More info | Where is link to anAlien Bee article titled How Much Power
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhilLight THREAD STARTER "manly fragrance,.. involuntarily celibate" 2,218 posts Likes: 21 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Indianapolis, IN More info | Aug 08, 2008 08:46 | #24 AB8ND wrote in post #6069956 ... I remember reading that some pro arenas have strobes permanently mounted and photographers (from recognized media)are issued PW's. I sure these are all strobes with the most power available. Jack I was told there is a pro here in town who has his own lights permanently mounted in several different sporting arenas in this city. It was estimated that he has about $40,000 invested just in lights. Please disregard all opinions in this post
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info | Aug 08, 2008 08:57 | #25 AB8ND wrote in post #6069956 Where is link to anAlien Bee article titled How Much Power http://www.paulcbuff.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=52 One quote that is interesting is "Our experience is that far more users end up wishing they had bought lower power lights (i.e. the AlienBees B400) rather than higher power." Precisely what I have been trying to tell people for a long, long time (and I never read that advice on PCB web site) You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhilLight THREAD STARTER "manly fragrance,.. involuntarily celibate" 2,218 posts Likes: 21 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Indianapolis, IN More info | Aug 08, 2008 09:01 | #26 AB8ND wrote in post #6069956 ..."Our experience is that far more users end up wishing they had bought lower power lights (i.e. the AlienBees B400) rather than higher power."... Wilt wrote in post #6070065 Precisely what I have been trying to tell people for a long, long time (and I never read that advice on PCB web site) This makes perfect sense. No argument from me. I assume though that most studio lighting newbs like me assume that the power can always be dialed down. We just want to make sure we have the most power and versatility when it might be needed. But it sounds like there is no "one light fits all" answer. Please disregard all opinions in this post
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TMRDesign Cream of the Crop 23,883 posts Likes: 12 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Huntington Station, NY More info | Aug 08, 2008 09:03 | #27 Wilt wrote in post #6070065 Precisely what I have been trying to tell people for a long, long time (and I never read that advice on PCB web site) Indubitably Robert
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hermes Goldmember 2,375 posts Joined Mar 2006 Location: London, UK More info | Aug 08, 2008 09:06 | #28 Wilt wrote in post #6070065 Precisely what I have been trying to tell people for a long, long time (and I never read that advice on PCB web site) I've tried to do the same and it really is futile. New photographers seem to be stuck in the 'more is better' mindset and completely unwilling to accept that buying higher-powered lights will often rob you of useful, lower power settings and gain you only impractical, higher ones.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TMRDesign Cream of the Crop 23,883 posts Likes: 12 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Huntington Station, NY More info | Aug 08, 2008 09:10 | #29 Hermes wrote in post #6070113 I've tried to do the same and it really is futile. New photographers seem to be stuck in the 'more is better' mindset and completely unwilling to accept that buying higher-powered lights will often rob you of useful, lower power settings and gain you only impractical, higher ones. I agree. It's a fight but I think we (you, me, Wilt) have made some progress in that department and seen many switch to lower power strobes. If it's explained in a real world practical way instead of just throwing numbers around then I think it makes more sense and potential buyers come to understand the concept of too much power being a bad or impractical thing, not to mention more costly. Robert
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RichNY Goldmember 1,817 posts Likes: 3 Joined Sep 2006 More info | Aug 09, 2008 01:01 | #30 The amount of power you will need for strobing a gym is going to be greatly dependent on how far away you mount the strobes. Nikon D3, D300, 10.5 Fisheye, 35 f/1.4, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.4, Zeiss 100 f/2, 105 f/2.5, 200 f/4 Micro, 200 f/2, 300 f/2.8, 14-24, 24-70, 70-200, SB-800x4, SB-900, SU-800, (3) Sunpak 120J (2) Profoto Acute 2400s,Chimera softboxes, (4)PW Multimax, (6) C-stands, (3) Bogen Superbooms, Autopoles
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 1633 guests, 144 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||