DDCSD wrote in post #6078352
Actually, it is better to price your gear for the lowest going rate, it will result in lower premiums. The insurance company is going to replace your gear with what it costs to purchase that gear, regardless of what you paid for it.
When you insure a car with 50,000 miles on it, do you pay your insurance based on what it cost you new?
No, of course you don't value a 50,000 mile car as it's new value. Car insurers don't replace an old car with a new one, though. They pay out, in cash, the value of the car as it stands.
New for old camera gear insurance works differently. You can lose a two year old 30D and be paid with a voucher with a value to get a new 30D or it's current equivalent.
If I were to value my old 20D, my three year old 5D and several lenses at the lowest going rate for second hand cameras (say £5,000) and then, when some tw*t nicks my full camera bag, put in a claim for £10,000 replacement value do you think they will pay up ?
The likely result is that I would get £5,000 as that is what I was insured for. It's also possible that they could reject any claim entirely as I hadn't been honest in my application, in an attempt to pay less than I should have been paying.
Never under estimate an insurance companies ability to avoid paying out, they can come up with some extremely spurious reasons for not coughing up. I suspect that all you are doing with this method of reducing your payments is giving them a way out of paying up if you have to claim.