Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 11 Aug 2008 (Monday) 07:00
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5D f/4 AF vs 30D AF vs 40D

 
goatee
"nice but dim"
Avatar
5,239 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: North of London, UK
     
Aug 11, 2008 07:00 |  #1

Ok, so I used to have a 40D with 24-70, and the AF was so good, that there wasn't a massive jump moving from the 40D to 1DMk2. I've since got rid of both, and now have a 30D with all f/4 lenses. One thing I've noticed is that the AF on the 30D is much more 'hesitant' than on the 40D, or 1DM2.

How does the AF on the 5D compare? It has the AF assist points, but it's the initial wait while the camera locks on I'm concerned with - how does it compare with f/4 lenses?


D7100, 50mm f/1.8, 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6, 70-300mm f/3.5-5.6 VR, SB800
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=552906flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elysium
"full of stupid banter"
Avatar
11,619 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Harrow/London/UK/GB/That Part Of The World/Next To France
     
Aug 11, 2008 07:03 |  #2

I used the 24-105L on my 5D and it was pin point accurate @ f/4. Produced very sharp and precise results. Seemed to work a lot better when comparing it against my 400D.
Sadly, not been able to compare to a 30D.

You should have tried out the combo when I came around. :P


Everyday, a programmer finds a way of creating an idiotproof program. Everyday, the universe spits out another idiot.....So far, the universe if winning

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
goatee
THREAD ­ STARTER
"nice but dim"
Avatar
5,239 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: North of London, UK
     
Aug 11, 2008 07:16 |  #3

I'm not concerned about the IQ when focus is achieved, but, there's a noticeable lag before it starts trying to focus when it's not bang on. I guess a way of describing it, is if on the 1D you have it set to ring of fire, it also has a slight lag, whereas selecting the centre point is immediate.

I've been manually selecting the focus point, and once it gets going it's fine.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


D7100, 50mm f/1.8, 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6, 70-300mm f/3.5-5.6 VR, SB800
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=552906flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elysium
"full of stupid banter"
Avatar
11,619 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Harrow/London/UK/GB/That Part Of The World/Next To France
     
Aug 11, 2008 07:24 |  #4

Hmmm....when im free one day, ill let you know and ill pop round, you can give it a try with my ex-lens. :lol:


Everyday, a programmer finds a way of creating an idiotproof program. Everyday, the universe spits out another idiot.....So far, the universe if winning

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elader
Goldmember
Avatar
2,374 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Maryland
     
Aug 11, 2008 07:26 |  #5

My 5D hunts a bit more in low light than the 40D. I noticed this with the 135L (f/2) in this situation where I was shooting ISO3200. f/2, 1/100th sec (dark indeed). It would rack back and forth a bit - never saw that with the 40D.

forgive the purple beard - I cant seem to lose the color of the light on his white beard.

IMAGE: http://elader.smugmug.com/photos/348461784_Lfc2C-XL.jpg

Eric
FJR1300 rider
5D mkIII and 1D MkIII

16-35L | 24-105L | 70-200L f/2.8IS | 85 f/1.8 / 50 f.1,4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
goatee
THREAD ­ STARTER
"nice but dim"
Avatar
5,239 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: North of London, UK
     
Aug 11, 2008 07:45 |  #6

elysium wrote in post #6085379 (external link)
Hmmm....when im free one day, ill let you know and ill pop round, you can give it a try with my ex-lens. :lol:

Thanks - that'd be really good. Otherwise I can meet you in town if it's more convenient.


D7100, 50mm f/1.8, 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6, 70-300mm f/3.5-5.6 VR, SB800
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=552906flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
goatee
THREAD ­ STARTER
"nice but dim"
Avatar
5,239 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: North of London, UK
     
Aug 11, 2008 07:47 |  #7

Hehe, I quite like that purple beard! I'm not too fussed about really low light - but in relatively low light levels - like in the shot I posted above, it just waits for a fraction of a second before starting to focus. My concern was just that the 5D came out before the 30D, and so its AF system is getting a little old now.

elader wrote in post #6085384 (external link)
My 5D hunts a bit more in low light than the 40D. I noticed this with the 135L (f/2) in this situation where I was shooting ISO3200. f/2, 1/100th sec (dark indeed). It would rack back and forth a bit - never saw that with the 40D.

forgive the purple beard - I cant seem to lose the color of the light on his white beard.
QUOTED IMAGE


D7100, 50mm f/1.8, 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6, 70-300mm f/3.5-5.6 VR, SB800
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=552906flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lowrider
Goldmember
Avatar
1,048 posts
Likes: 291
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Tucson
     
Aug 11, 2008 08:57 as a reply to  @ goatee's post |  #8

I've had my 40D about two weeks now. Previously I had a 30D, and yes, it's been my experience that the 40D does auto focus more quickly than the 30D did.

Lou




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
versedmb
Goldmember
4,448 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Apr 2006
     
Aug 11, 2008 11:08 |  #9

goatee wrote in post #6085307 (external link)
O
How does the AF on the 5D compare? It has the AF assist points, but it's the initial wait while the camera locks on I'm concerned with - how does it compare with f/4 lenses?

The center point of the 5D is accurate, but its noticably slower than the 40D. The 40D also seems to have more accurate outer AF points; I only trust the center point of the 5D. The 40D focus feels almost instant with USM lenses, with the 5D there is a lag. Its one of the things I hope that the 5D II improves upon.


Gear List

Michael

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
goatee
THREAD ­ STARTER
"nice but dim"
Avatar
5,239 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: North of London, UK
     
Aug 11, 2008 11:29 |  #10

Thanks for the feedback. Well, hopefully we'll find out soon enough :D.


D7100, 50mm f/1.8, 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6, 70-300mm f/3.5-5.6 VR, SB800
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=552906flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JCheungPhoto
Goldmember
Avatar
1,338 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Virginia
     
Aug 11, 2008 11:38 |  #11

I went from the 30D to the 5D. Focusing using centre point on the 30D is similar to focusing centre with the 5D. The difference is frame rate, but otherwise not huge difference between the 30 and 5. However I can't say anything about the 40D.


gear
freewebs.com/jcheungph​otography

"prior planning prevents piss-poor performance"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wimg
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,982 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Netherlands, EU
     
Aug 11, 2008 11:44 |  #12

My 5D focused more accurately than the 40D, but the 40D focuses faster.

I received the 40D back from Canon last Thursday, and this was one of the things supposed to be fixed, so maybe AF accuracy has improved. I'll see.

Kind regards, Wim


EOS R & EOS 5 (analog) with a gaggle of primes & 3 zooms, OM-D E-M1 Mk II & Pen-F with 10 primes, 6 zooms, 3 Metabones adapters/speedboosters​, and an accessory plague

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kcbrown
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,384 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Silicon Valley
     
Aug 11, 2008 12:13 |  #13

wimg wrote in post #6086517 (external link)
My 5D focused more accurately than the 40D, but the 40D focuses faster.

I received the 40D back from Canon last Thursday, and this was one of the things supposed to be fixed, so maybe AF accuracy has improved. I'll see.

Have you noticed any difference thus far since you got it back?


"There are some things that money can't buy, but they aren't Ls and aren't worth having" -- Shooter-boy
Canon: 2 x 7D, Sigma 17-50 f/2.8 OS, 55-250 IS, Sigma 8-16, 24-105L, Sigma 50/1.4, other assorted primes, and a 430EX.
Nikon: D750, D600, 24-85 VR, 50 f/1.8G, 85 f/1.8G, Tamron 24-70 VC, Tamron 70-300 VC.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eelnoraa
Goldmember
1,798 posts
Likes: 37
Joined May 2007
     
Aug 11, 2008 13:01 |  #14

Speaking from experience, 30D AF is same as 5D.

Comparing F2.8 lens on 40D to F4 lens on 30D/5D, the differece will be large. If you put F2.8 lens on both, center AF point accuracy will be the same. 40D will be probably faster

goatee wrote in post #6085307 (external link)
Ok, so I used to have a 40D with 24-70, and the AF was so good, that there wasn't a massive jump moving from the 40D to 1DMk2. I've since got rid of both, and now have a 30D with all f/4 lenses. One thing I've noticed is that the AF on the 30D is much more 'hesitant' than on the 40D, or 1DM2.

How does the AF on the 5D compare? It has the AF assist points, but it's the initial wait while the camera locks on I'm concerned with - how does it compare with f/4 lenses?


5Di, 5Diii, 28, 50, 85, 16-35II, 24-105, 70-200F2.8 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dragos ­ Jianu
Goldmember
1,768 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Sep 2005
     
Aug 11, 2008 14:12 |  #15

eelnoraa wrote in post #6087006 (external link)
Speaking from experience, 30D AF is same as 5D.

My experience was completely different. Though i have the 20D for comparison. I could never trust the 20D at f/2. Not even the central. The 5D is MUCH more accurate then my 20D. Around 85-90% spot on at f/2 using the central. As for speed i can't tell much of a difference, it's never been a problem. One other thing I've noticed is that the 5D is much better in Servo too. Must be the 6 hidden assist points.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,256 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
5D f/4 AF vs 30D AF vs 40D
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur
1403 guests, 178 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.