Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 12 Aug 2008 (Tuesday) 10:29
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Monolight kit/Softbox Kit?

 
dtufino
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
4,040 posts
Likes: 605
Joined Apr 2006
Location: New York Gritty
     
Aug 13, 2008 08:41 as a reply to  @ post 6099147 |  #16

Hey guys, thanks for all the input and advice. i'll let you know know what i went with.


-David T.
www.dtufinophoto.com (external link)

@dtufino_photo (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dtufino
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
4,040 posts
Likes: 605
Joined Apr 2006
Location: New York Gritty
     
Aug 13, 2008 08:55 as a reply to  @ dtufino's post |  #17

Ok guys, i saw this kit and it's within my price range:

http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …KITS_Home_Studi​o_Kit.html (external link)

IMAGE: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/images/largeimages/50300.jpg

this is strobe lighting kit, i have children and don;t want then getting burned with the Tungsten lights.... let me know

-David T.
www.dtufinophoto.com (external link)

@dtufino_photo (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rudi
Goldmember
Avatar
3,751 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2002
Location: Australia
     
Aug 13, 2008 21:15 |  #18

That one is very underpowered, it's ONLY ONE QUARTER the power of the Genesis 200 (2 light) kit. Very limiting, IMO.


• Wedding Photographer - Sydney and Wollongong (external link)
• Borrowed Moment (blog) (external link)

Life is uncertain. Eat dessert first.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
slivr
Senior Member
Avatar
627 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Reno / Lake Tahoe - Nevada, USA
     
Aug 14, 2008 00:42 |  #19

Again - it would work ... but you could do soooo much better for a one-time, economical investment. I don't want to sound like some repeating Genesis fanatic - but Calumet also sells the Genesis 200 as a one-light kit for $169 if money's the deciding factor of your purchase. It gives you the 2-way umbrella (reflective or shoot-thru), a nice stand, reflector dish, etc. Then purchase a 36"-44" reflector (I have the 5-in-1) and it acts like a second light that reflects your main back in. You can bang out some awesome portraits with that simple setup, y'know.

Anyway - don't want to rain on your parade if you like that kit above. It DOES provide two lights, a somewhat tiny softbox and a 2nd umbrella for variety - but since it's less light output than many camera-mounted flashes I think you're going to outgrow it and be disatisfied within months of purchase. Another $0.02 from the peanut gallery. LOL


- Jason S.
More gear and money than talent ... but workin' at it!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
Aug 14, 2008 02:24 as a reply to  @ slivr's post |  #20

I agree with Rudi and Jason. I can understand budgetary constraints and wanting to get the most for your dollar but so far I have not seen a better value in entry level strobes than any of the various kit configurations of the Calumet Genesis 200's.

The kit you're looking at is underpowered, has no modeling light and is, in my opinion, a poor choice, and one you'll outgrow quickly.

Jason's suggestion is a very good one. Don't underestimate the ability of a single light kit with a white reflector, and if your budget can only afford the kit then grab some white foam core and use that as a reflector.

Many of use have and still do use white foam core for reflector's and interestingly enough, foam core provides some VERY nice, soft light.

Some outstanding work has been produced with 1 light and a reflector so don't think that by only having 1 light is in some way inferior.


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dtufino
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
4,040 posts
Likes: 605
Joined Apr 2006
Location: New York Gritty
     
Aug 14, 2008 08:00 as a reply to  @ TMR Design's post |  #21

Again, you guys are great. I will go ahead and purchase the genesis today. thanks again guys!


-David T.
www.dtufinophoto.com (external link)

@dtufino_photo (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jannie
Goldmember
4,936 posts
Joined Jan 2008
     
Aug 14, 2008 08:41 |  #22

I'm reading this with interest and am trying to figure out the same things. I've been looking at the Alien Bees 400 and 800 on line and an Elinchrom monohead at my store, cannot figure out why one is called 400 and has less light than the Genesis 200, is there some reference here or is it just marketing.

For starters I'd like to try a single head, with maybe an octobox with grid for portraiture and be able to use it for tabletop/food photography as well, this Genesis you are touting, is it durable and well built, the cost range on this stuff if huge.

Taking shots of people in their homes is going to require the light to be close, from 4' to maybe 7' away space allowing, is there a better choice of box, octobox for these distances? And how much power do I really need to work with?


Ms.Jannie
"When you come to a fork in the road, take it"!
1DMKIII, 85LII, 24-70L, 100-400L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
Aug 14, 2008 09:09 as a reply to  @ Jannie's post |  #23

The Genesis 200 is a 200ws strobe. The Alien Bees B400 is 160ws. PCB invented the 'effective ws' concept. Forget about that and just look at the actual power delivered. To step up from Genesis 200 you can go to a Genesis 400 for 400ws or the Alien Bees B800 which is 320ws. Keep in mind that the Genesis strobes are digitally controlled and the Bees are analog.


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jr_senator
Goldmember
Avatar
4,861 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Aug 14, 2008 13:14 |  #24

Robert, did you convert form Canon to Nikon?



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
Aug 14, 2008 13:15 |  #25

jr_senator wrote in post #6107307 (external link)
Robert, did you convert form Canon to Nikon?

Yes, I sure did.


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jr_senator
Goldmember
Avatar
4,861 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Aug 14, 2008 16:48 |  #26

TMR Design wrote in post #6107319 (external link)
Yes, I sure did.

Well, at least you stayed with your Canon friends.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
Aug 14, 2008 16:56 |  #27

jr_senator wrote in post #6108645 (external link)
Well, at least you stayed with your Canon friends.

The cool thing about lighting and this lighting forum is that is doesn't matter whether we shoot Canon, Nikon, Fuji, Mamiya, film or digital. Light is light and this forum will always be my home :D

Incidentally, I do use a Canon 500D closeup lens on my Nikon lenses. ;)


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jr_senator
Goldmember
Avatar
4,861 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Aug 14, 2008 18:07 |  #28

TMR Design wrote in post #6108702 (external link)
Incidentally, I do use a Canon 500D closeup lens on my Nikon lenses. ;)

Yeah, I did notice that in your sig. I have one too but haven't used it since I don't know when.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
slivr
Senior Member
Avatar
627 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Reno / Lake Tahoe - Nevada, USA
     
Aug 15, 2008 01:41 |  #29

dtufino - you're going to be pleasantly surprised when you pull it out. It's solid, very easy and intuitive to use, easy to grip and has much better lighting "punch" than those others you looked at. A piece of white foam-core at Office Depot for about $3 to act as another reflector as Robert (TMR Design) stated, and you're going to love your portraiture!


- Jason S.
More gear and money than talent ... but workin' at it!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
slivr
Senior Member
Avatar
627 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Reno / Lake Tahoe - Nevada, USA
     
Aug 15, 2008 02:22 |  #30

Jannie - It's true! I do tend to tout the Genesis I guess. I was surprised with their tough/durable housing and feel, and all the features they'd squeezed into their economy lights. I won't go through all their benefits (you can read many of them in THIS REVIEW among others. They're 25% stronger than Alien Bees "400" - so you're putting more light onto your subject at any distance and with every modifier over an Alien Bee. Period!

But in all fairness - I've also used Alien Bees numerous times and have zero complaints about them. They were flawless and performed exactly as expected. Their strongest point (in my opinion) is the inexpensive accessories and modifiers available for them from the Alien Bees website. But since they produce less light and cost more than the Genesis ... well you get the idea.

As far as the D-Lites - I've only futzed with them at the store but never shot using one. Robert (TMR Design) has done extensive testing with them which show D-lites have some of the best light and color consistency of any "economical" brand in the market which stands to reason given their heritage. Their manufacturer (Elinchrom) is well regarded for their higher-end products which rate among the top tier of light products today. I just felt the D's were a little more "plastic-y" and lightweight than I wanted, and when I was making my selection the D-Lites didn't have fans in them yet. I understand the newer ones do now so that's a moot point it seems. So those are the three brands that immediately come to mind when I think of good, affordable lighting ... however Genesis kicks others in the butt at the cash register.

I use a 36"x48" rectangle softbox for my mainlight and have been satisfied with the results. For single-head portraits I set them about 4 feet from the subject, often at less than full power. Don't have the Octa, but keep looking at them. I think it could be overkill for the average product shot, but they're certainly hard to beat for fashion and beauty genre based on the examples I've seen.


- Jason S.
More gear and money than talent ... but workin' at it!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,211 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Monolight kit/Softbox Kit?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2700 guests, 137 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.