Which lens should I use with which body?
I was thinking:
24-70 f/2.8L with the 1D Mark III
70-200 f/2.8L with the 20D or 40D
Would this setup be the best way to get the most out of these lenses?
Harry® Member 36 posts Joined Dec 2007 Location: Brooklyn, New York More info | Aug 13, 2008 11:08 | #1 Which lens should I use with which body? http://www.nyctransitforums.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mlav Goldmember 1,227 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jun 2006 Location: Detroit, USA More info | Aug 13, 2008 11:12 | #2 uh, exactly what you posted. Why do you even need to ask? http://mlav.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 13, 2008 12:20 | #3 mlav wrote in post #6099997 uh, exactly what you posted. Why do you even need to ask? Take it easy champ I wasn't sure and wanted some opinions. Sorry to have disturbed you. I thought this was a discussion board. http://www.nyctransitforums.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EatonPhotos Senior Member 996 posts Joined Oct 2007 Location: Kentucky More info | Aug 13, 2008 12:28 | #4 Harry® wrote in post #6099974 Which lens should I use with which body? I was thinking: 24-70 f/2.8L with the 1D Mark III 70-200 f/2.8L with the 20D or 40D Would this setup be the best way to get the most out of these lenses? Depends on what you are shooting. However, to answer your question, yes your described setup, would be the most efficient means of covering your focal lengths, from Wide to Telephoto. But, a 1 series & 70-200/2.8 is a killer setup. It is, and has been my most commonly used combo. JamesFacebook Profile
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Pandya Member 243 posts Joined Mar 2008 More info | Aug 13, 2008 12:31 | #5 I'd probably do it the other way around, the 1D MKIII has better autofocus which is probably more likely tracking moving stuff on the telephoto, and a higher burst rate for when you need it. But equally, 1.3 crop on the MKIII means the telephoto has less reach...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mlav Goldmember 1,227 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jun 2006 Location: Detroit, USA More info | Aug 13, 2008 12:33 | #6 Harry® wrote in post #6100369 Take it easy champ I wasn't sure and wanted some opinions. Sorry to have disturbed you. I thought this was a discussion board. http://mlav.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sugarzebra Cream of the Crop More info | Aug 13, 2008 12:34 | #7 Not to move the discussion beyond what you asked, but if I was using a two body, two lens set up, I would replace the 24-70 with a 16-35 Scott
LOG IN TO REPLY |
engrmariano Senior Member 793 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2007 Location: Pinoy in SG More info | Aug 13, 2008 15:37 | #8 Harry® wrote in post #6099974 Which lens should I use with which body? I was thinking: 24-70 f/2.8L with the 1D Mark III 70-200 f/2.8L with the 20D or 40D Would this setup be the best way to get the most out of these lenses? in this way, youll cover 32-320mm (eq), but only 38-260mm (eq) if the otherway around. The Filipino is worth dying for -> Ninoy (Nov. 27, '32 - Aug. 21, '83)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
luant16 Senior Member 424 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2006 More info | Aug 14, 2008 12:51 | #9 r u gonna use 10fps on 24-70? i think 10 fps would be more useful on 70-200 (IMO)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
runninmann what the heck do I know? More info | Aug 14, 2008 13:31 | #10 engrmariano wrote in post #6101547 in this way, youll cover 32-320mm (eq), but only 38-260mm (eq) if the otherway around. Does this assume that the 20D/40D provides the same IQ as the 1D cropped to the same FOV?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is bzguy 1384 guests, 188 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||