I just bought a used Howtek 4500 drum scanner for $2000. I'll get it up and running within a few days.
Be interested in that
MaDProFF THREAD STARTER Goldmember 4,369 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2007 Location: East Sussex, UK More info | Aug 18, 2008 16:14 | #31 DrPablo wrote in post #6131899 I just bought a used Howtek 4500 drum scanner for $2000. I'll get it up and running within a few days. Be interested in that Photographic Images on Brett Butler
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sjones Goldmember 2,261 posts Likes: 249 Joined Aug 2005 Location: Chicago More info | Aug 19, 2008 05:47 | #32 Well, I thought I would give it a shot...can't win them all... DrPablo wrote in post #6131899 I just bought a used Howtek 4500 drum scanner for $2000. I'll get it up and running within a few days. Certainly a good price, but if it had mirrored my budget when I purchased the scanner, I would be using the Nikon Coolscan 9000 instead of the V ED. Nevertheless, worth considering the refurb/used route in the future.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DrPablo Goldmember 1,568 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jan 2006 Location: North Carolina More info | Aug 19, 2008 16:20 | #33 sjones wrote in post #6136190 Certainly a good price, but if it had mirrored my budget when I purchased the scanner, I would be using the Nikon Coolscan 9000 I was very near doing that, but I shoot a lot of 4x5 and 8x10 sheet film, and so I wanted a high end scanner that could take those. I also now shoot 6x12 on a Noblex, and I've heard that the 9000 has trouble with 6x12 and 6x17. Still, I am already feeling apprehensive about using the inkjet's 'color' to produce a toned print, such as sepia, palladium, or the above-mentioned cyanotype. I've done a lot of cyanotyping, vandyke brown printing, and toned lith printing, and there is a lot more to the end product than the color. The texture of the paper, the refractive properties of the crystals, the ability to duotone (like with tea-toned cyanotypes) and other properties like the tonal range and archivability are things that an inkjet can't imitate. Canon 5D Mark IV, 24-105L II, 17 TS-E f/4L, MPE 65, Sigma 50 f/1.4, Sigma 85 f/1.4, 100 f/2.8L, 135 f/2L, 70-200 f/4L, 400 L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2657 guests, 155 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||