Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 16 Aug 2008 (Saturday) 09:52
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "Which setup is more appealing to you?"
17-40L, 70-200/4 IS, 35L, 50/1.8 & 85/1.8
15
11.7%
17-40L, 24-70L, 70-200/4 IS, 50/1.4 & 85/1.8
44
34.4%
24-70L, 70-200/2.8 IS, 50/1.4 & 580EX
69
53.9%

128 voters, 128 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Poll: Which setup is more appealing to you?

 
Pasukun
Goldmember
Avatar
1,388 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: US
     
Aug 16, 2008 09:52 |  #1

As I am doing more and more weddings, ceremonies and other outdoor activities..

I find myself using zoom lenses far more than my prime lenses..

Thing is.. I am a prime lens lover.. I use them whenever I can, and they never lets me down.

It is just that.. it is becoming harder to find a time to use them.. And I feel the need of a faster zoom lenses.. Also missing focal length between 40mm-70mm is impacting me more than I have thought.

So I have come to an conclusion with these 2 potential setups..

Currently I have, 17-40L, 70-200/4 IS, 35L, 50/1.8 & 85/1.8.

And thinking about.. 17-40L, 24-70L, 70-200/4 IS, 50/1.4 & 85/1.8.

Or.. 24-70L, 70-200/2.8 IS, 50/1.4 & 580EX

What would you do in my shoes?

I appreciate your time and input. Thanks. :)


"the things we touch have no permanence.. as there is nothing we can hold onto in this world.. only by letting it go can we truly possess what is real.."

My Gears

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dorman
Goldmember
Avatar
4,661 posts
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Halifax, NS
     
Aug 16, 2008 10:11 |  #2

As a wedding shooter myself F/2.8 is invaluable, as is the versatility of good zooms. I'm all for supplementing zooms with primes, but the zooms for my style of event shooting are the corner stone. I went with your third option, and if possible I'd keep the 17-40 in there too. If you are shooting with a crop body consider the 17-55 IS as well. The biggest thing is F/2.8 in the telephoto. There's my two cents, for future posters maybe indicate what bodies you are shooting with.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jman13
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,567 posts
Likes: 164
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Columbus, OH
     
Aug 16, 2008 10:16 |  #3

For me, it'd be #2 hands down.


Jordan Steele - http://www.jsteelephot​os.com (external link) | https://www.admiringli​ght.com (external link)
---------------
Canon EOS R5 | R6 | TTArtisan 11mm Fisheye | Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 | RF 24-105mm f/4L IS | Tamron 35mm f/1.4 | RF 35mm f/1.8 | RF 50mm f/1.8 | RF 85mm f/2 | RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS | Sigma 135mm f/1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
zod
Member
Avatar
214 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Rain City Baby
     
Aug 16, 2008 10:53 |  #4

I think that the third option, especially since it comes with a flash and covers a great range (especially if you kept the 17-40L) would be the best set up. The 70-200 is a phenomenal lens, as well as the 24-70 (or most L lenses).

On another note, PM me if you want to sell your 50mm 1.8


http://www.behzodsirja​ni.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pasukun
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,388 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: US
     
Aug 16, 2008 11:08 |  #5

Jman13 wrote in post #6118668 (external link)
For me, it'd be #2 hands down.

I hear you.. it is tempting setup.
Bascially I will have to trade 35L for 24-70L and get 50/1.4 to replace the 50/1.8.
It is also most modest change over.. (meaning less $$$ to bleed :))

Dorman wrote in post #6118648 (external link)
As a wedding shooter myself F/2.8 is invaluable, as is the versatility of good zooms. I'm all for supplementing zooms with primes, but the zooms for my style of event shooting are the corner stone. I went with your third option, and if possible I'd keep the 17-40 in there too. If you are shooting with a crop body consider the 17-55 IS as well. The biggest thing is F/2.8 in the telephoto. There's my two cents, for future posters maybe indicate what bodies you are shooting with.

I have 5D, and you are right..
Constant f/2.8 from 24mm to 200mm will serve me real well.
Many times I had to shoot with ISO800 or higher using f/4 to keep the shutter speed just adequate..
In cases like that.. f/2.8 will be an invaluable asset.


"the things we touch have no permanence.. as there is nothing we can hold onto in this world.. only by letting it go can we truly possess what is real.."

My Gears

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pasukun
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,388 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: US
     
Aug 16, 2008 11:17 |  #6

Well.. so far..
4 votes for the #2 and 10 votes for the #3.
And none for the #1, which is my current setup. :p

Believe it or not.. this poll is helping me tremendously.
At least it is telling me that I am not as insane as I thought.. :)
Thanks guys.


"the things we touch have no permanence.. as there is nothing we can hold onto in this world.. only by letting it go can we truly possess what is real.."

My Gears

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
m-bartelt
Senior Member
Avatar
789 posts
Joined Apr 2008
     
Aug 16, 2008 11:30 |  #7

#3. You'll want the flash, and it's best to keep a kit as small as possible, IMO.


Canon 40D 10-22mm 24-105L 580 EX II
Canon IIIA LTM Serenar 28mm 3.5
Serenar 50mm 1.8
Leica IIIf RD ST LTM Elmar 50mm 3.5
Nikkor 50mm 1.4
Kodak Brownie No 2
:P

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
therealmr
Senior Member
519 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2008
     
Aug 16, 2008 11:43 |  #8

Keep it simple, #3.

Full range + good prime + flash. What more could you want?


http://www.simkinsphot​ography.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sebr
Goldmember
Avatar
4,628 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Sweden/France
     
Aug 16, 2008 11:49 |  #9

I am also leaning for #3 because of the f/2.8 on the telephoto.


Sebastien
5D mkIII ; 17-40L ; 24-105L ; 70-200L II ; 70-300L ; 35L ; Σ85/1.4 ; 135L ; 100macro ; Kenko 1.4x ; 2x mkIII ; 580EXII
M5 ; M1 ; 11-22 ; 18-150 ; 22/2.0 ; EF adapter; Manfrotto LED
Benron Tripod; ThinkTank, Lowepro and Crumpler bags; Fjällräven backpack

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Petelebon
Member
200 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Montréal, Québec, Canada
     
Aug 16, 2008 11:59 as a reply to  @ sebr's post |  #10

Although the choice #3 with the EF 70-200 f/2.8 is more appealing, I chose choice #2 because the f/2.8 version of the 70-200 is all too heavy to carry around. Besides, the f/4 IS version of the 70-200 is one of Canon's best lenses ever, as sharp if not sharper than the f/2.8, but lighter to carry. f4 is okay for me if there is IS on the lens. Moreover, 17-40, 24-70 and EF50 f/1.4 and EF85 f/1.8 are a great selection of lenses. However, I would probably swap the 24-70 for the EF-S 10-22 on a cropped sensor camera. Moreover, I would then switch the 17-40 for the EF-S 17-55 f/2.8. You may also add the cheaper 380EX flash later-on.
My 2 cents.

So final choice I suggest:
EF-S 10-22
EF-S 17-55 f/2.8
EF 70-200 f/4 IS
EF 50 f/1.4
EF 85 f/1.8
380EX Flash


Petelebon
Canon Digital Rebel T6S with Kit 18-135 IS STM Lens
Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4.5, Canon EF-S 10-22 f3.5-4.5 USM
Canon EF 70-300 f4-5.6 IS USM, Canon EF 50 f1.8 mkII
Canon EF-S 55-250 f4-5.6 IS & Canon 430EX flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mattograph
"God bless the new meds"
Avatar
7,693 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
     
Aug 16, 2008 12:02 |  #11

Voted #3, just for the light. Gotta have light, man!


This space for rent.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
darkninja67
Senior Member
Avatar
316 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Boston, MA
     
Aug 16, 2008 12:08 as a reply to  @ mattograph's post |  #12

Having a faster lens never hurts (usually) Voted #3


Bill

Canon 40D gripped, Tamron 17-50mm f2.8, Sigma 24-60mm f2.8, Tokina 50-135mm f2.8, Feisol CT-3442 w/ Manfrotto 488RC4 ballhead, Manfrotto 679B monopod

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Aaagogo
Goldmember
Avatar
2,403 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Daytona Beach, FL
     
Aug 16, 2008 12:32 |  #13

I voted for #3 cause that is my exact setup, all 3 lens mounted on 3 bodies.

although once i save up enough, i'm thinking of 3 primes

24L, 85L and 135L


https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=4655753&pos​tcount=953 Your 1st 10,000 images are your worst
One photo out of focus is a mistake, ten photo out of focus are an experimentation, one hundred photo out of focus are a style

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bsaber
I have no idea what's going on
Avatar
3,536 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     
Aug 16, 2008 12:35 |  #14

For weddings a flash is a necessity IMHO. A good zoom like the 24-70L and some fast primes is a must too.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GMCPhotographics
Goldmember
Avatar
2,569 posts
Gallery: 215 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 1535
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Wiltshire, UK
     
Aug 16, 2008 12:51 |  #15

bsaber wrote in post #6119181 (external link)
For weddings a flash is a necessity IMHO. A good zoom like the 24-70L and some fast primes is a must too.

Really? I haven't used one all season.


Regards, Gareth Cooper GMCPhotographics
"If youre happy and honest and fulfilled in what you do, then youҒre having a successful life" (Ben Elton)
Gear List GMCPhotographics (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,898 views & 0 likes for this thread, 21 members have posted to it.
Poll: Which setup is more appealing to you?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is SteveeY
1257 guests, 166 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.