Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 17 Aug 2008 (Sunday) 00:51
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Moon Shots. What do you think?

 
CameraMan741
Senior Member
Avatar
323 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
     
Aug 17, 2008 00:51 |  #1

looking for some Critique on these two moon shots. first time i was able to see the moon from out house in about a month. lol

IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3036/2769395063_0738d42937_b.jpg

IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3232/2769395011_1567340903_b.jpg

BTW, first time shooting the moon. tell me how i did!!! be as rough and rude as you want!

Gear
XTi, Sigma 70-300 APO DG Macro, Nifty Fifty

Flick (external link)r

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dusty
Goldmember
Avatar
1,152 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 119
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Aug 17, 2008 10:42 |  #2

Wow lovely shots, well done, nice and sharp !!!

Seems like there's some shadow missing though.......:o


Dusty
20Da, 7D MkII, 5DII,1DX, 16-35L , 24-105L , 85L , 135L , 200L f/2.8 , 300L f/2.8 , MP-E 65

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CameraMan741
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
323 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
     
Aug 17, 2008 11:02 |  #3

lol. i wish i could have caught a shadow, weather it be an elclipse or just a half or cresent moon. would have loved the craters to show...


Gear
XTi, Sigma 70-300 APO DG Macro, Nifty Fifty

Flick (external link)r

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canadian ­ Techdiver
Senior Member
Avatar
726 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Its Summer I am underwater scuba diving Silly.
     
Aug 17, 2008 20:39 |  #4

Nice shots... I am new at this two. here is a picture from my second try...

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=554643


Camera gear: YEP

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
slimninj4
Goldmember
Avatar
1,151 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Jun 2007
     
Aug 18, 2008 12:02 |  #5

Great job at these. I have also been working on getting a good shot of the moon. Mine still come out a bit blurred at 200mm. What focal distance did you use for these?


Canon 40D 5Dm3 || 24-70 L 70-200 2.8 IS2 100mm Macro 50mm 1.8 35 1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
polarbare
Senior Member
Avatar
575 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Natick, MA
     
Aug 18, 2008 12:11 |  #6

<insert comment about rule of thirds from someone here>

Nice shots of the moon. I'd consider either having the moon take up the whole frame, or making it a smaller subject to show the vastness of space surrounding it.


Brad Moore
My Sportshooter (external link) Page
Polarbare Photo Blog (external link)
Photojournalist for Bostonist.com (external link)
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/polarbare (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canadian ­ Techdiver
Senior Member
Avatar
726 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Its Summer I am underwater scuba diving Silly.
     
Aug 18, 2008 12:28 |  #7

rule of thirds I get it but the negative space looked funny to the right or left or top or bottom to me.. I should have cropped in more on mine maybe.

SlimNinj4 what are you shooting at.

Mine was at 300mm
setup on a tripod with a timer for the shutter to ensure I had minimal vibration from triggering the camera. (as someone else suggested to me I should have done a mirror lockup as well)

I was shooting Iso 100-320
F/5.6 -8.0
and shutter speeds between 1/200 and 1/400

once down to the 1/200 range I had blur..

you need to figure out if blur is from movement or halo starting to be produced from over exposure....etc. I am sure others can tell you more then me. This was only my second go at it. First time was an eclipse.


Camera gear: YEP

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Boehme
Enjoy being spanked
Avatar
7,359 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 89
Joined Jan 2007
Location: DFW Metro-mess, Texas
     
Aug 18, 2008 16:25 as a reply to  @ Canadian Techdiver's post |  #8

I like the second image the best ... the exposure on the first one is just a little too high.

There is no rule of thirds in outer space -- astrophotography is documentary photography and not artistic.

Here are a few suggestions for moon photography:

  • Of course, use a tripod
  • Use mirror lock-up ... this makes a huge difference.
  • If using a zoom lens, do not shoot wide open because most zoom lenses are not at their sharpest at maximum aperture. On my f/2.8 lens, the sharpest images are between f/5.5 and f/8.
  • Use AF to set the focusing and then turn AF off before shooting.
  • Use a remote shutter release.
  • Try shutter speeds from 1/250 sec to 1/400 second (for full moon, I like 1/400), aperture of f/8, and ISO 100.
  • To get a decent sized image, you ought to have at least 200 mm focal length and 400 mm is much nicer. Tele-converters will decrease the sharpness slightly, but usually not too much.
  • Try to set up away from lights because they can introduce some flare ... also use the lens hood.

Atmospheric haze in images? Click for Tutorial to Reduce Atmospheric Haze with Photoshop.
Gear List .... Gallery: Woodturner Bill (external link)
Donate to Support POTN Operating Costs

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CameraMan741
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
323 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
     
Aug 18, 2008 18:00 as a reply to  @ Bill Boehme's post |  #9

thanks. i was shooting at 300mm, but that night, the moon seemed quite small. i will try some of the suggestions everyone stated above, if i can see the moon from my house.

i did use a tripod. didnt use mirror lock up, but will look into it after this post. i shot at f5.6 for the second one at 1/640 second shutter and the first one i shot at f11 and 1/160 second shutter. i will try the auto focus thing if the moons out tonight. i didnt use a remote shutter since i dont have one, but i did put it on the timer, so it did reduce the shake some. i did have a lens hood on as well, but was next to a lamp, which i will turn off next time.


Gear
XTi, Sigma 70-300 APO DG Macro, Nifty Fifty

Flick (external link)r

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CameraMan741
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
323 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
     
Aug 18, 2008 18:07 as a reply to  @ Bill Boehme's post |  #10

a little pp on this one. made a looser crop, and positioned it this time. hows this? is the contrast a bit much?

IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3188/2775566389_528b20eb84_b.jpg

Gear
XTi, Sigma 70-300 APO DG Macro, Nifty Fifty

Flick (external link)r

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thescottandrew
Senior Member
906 posts
Joined Apr 2006
     
Aug 18, 2008 21:10 |  #11

nice i like the second one best



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aram535
Goldmember
Avatar
1,915 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
     
Aug 18, 2008 22:34 |  #12

Unless Nashville gets closer to the moon than New York does, no way those are 300mm shots! :-)

Good thing I just ordered myself a Tamron AF 200-500mm f/5.0-6.3 Di LD SP FEC (IF) Lens. :-) I'll be ready for the next full moon. I just wish my 70-200mm 2.8 had a bit more reach. That 6.3 is going to be the death of me.


Gear List * www.tranquilphotos.com (external link) * My Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CameraMan741
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
323 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
     
Aug 18, 2008 22:44 as a reply to  @ aram535's post |  #13

its true. 300mm. im quite pleased, but remember these are crops. moon looked really small on the originals, which sort of discouraged me when looking on the LCD, but i continued on shooting. BTW, i thought the moon looked way smaller than normal when i shot these too. lol


Gear
XTi, Sigma 70-300 APO DG Macro, Nifty Fifty

Flick (external link)r

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aram535
Goldmember
Avatar
1,915 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
     
Aug 19, 2008 07:19 |  #14

Yeah I figured you had them cropped a little closer. You would think being 60 miles away from New York City, having water on both sides I wouldn't get too much light pollution but that's not the case out here. I have to drive another hour east to get a decent "darker" location. After my new lens arrive I might take another trip.


Gear List * www.tranquilphotos.com (external link) * My Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jimken61
Senior Member
Avatar
440 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2008
Location: Nederland, Texas
     
Aug 19, 2008 21:32 as a reply to  @ aram535's post |  #15

You have some nice shots here, I like a tighter crop on these myself. Another helpful bit of info is to wait until the moon is directly overhead. You don't have as much distortion from the atomosphere, your looking through in a more direct line. Also shoot in raw so you can get the most info to play with. Here is one of my shots from a while back. I shot this with a 40D, 100-400 with a 2x teleconverter on a tripod with a remote shutter release. F11, 1/250, ISO 400. The other most important thing is to keep having fun!!!

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE

Gear List
http://www.nfspics.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,380 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
Moon Shots. What do you think?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2874 guests, 149 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.