Can anyone see if the ET-83 II (from the 70-200/2.8 non IS) will fit the 100-400? The 100-400 hood is an ET-83C......So, it should fit...right? both are 83's.
thatkatmat Cream of the Crop  9,342 posts Gallery: 41 photos Likes: 205 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Seattle, don't move here, it's wet and cold More info | Aug 19, 2008 11:02 | #1 Can anyone see if the ET-83 II (from the 70-200/2.8 non IS) will fit the 100-400? The 100-400 hood is an ET-83C......So, it should fit...right? both are 83's. My Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MGW172 Senior Member 503 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2006 Location: Tennessee More info | Aug 19, 2008 11:09 | #2 thatkatmat wrote in post #6137666  Can anyone see if the ET-83 II (from the 70-200/2.8 non IS) will fit the 100-400? The 100-400 hood is an ET-83C......So, it should fit...right? both are 83's. Asked 6 days ago: 7D | 20D | Canon 10-22 | Canon 15-85 | Canon 70-300 L | Canon 100-400 L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thatkatmat THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 9,342 posts Gallery: 41 photos Likes: 205 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Seattle, don't move here, it's wet and cold More info | Aug 19, 2008 11:30 | #3 LOL, well, gosh, my bad for not using the search function My Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Overkill Goldmember  1,062 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: Amsterdam Netherlands More info | Aug 19, 2008 13:24 | #4 thatkatmat wrote in post #6137801 LOL, well, gosh, my bad for not using the search function  But....Thanks! Hmm i tried the 70-200 2.8 Hood on my 100-400 IS USM and..... at 100mm i get dark corners... i can see the hood on the picture.... so dont be cheap and buy a hood (if you own these two you should be able to buy a decent hood)! Canon EOS 40D Gripped / 20D Gripped, EF 70-200 2.8L, [COLOR=black]EF 100-400 IS USM L, EF-S 17-55 2.8 IS USM, EF-S 10-22 USM, Sigma 105mm 2.8 EX Macro, Kenko 2XTC DG Kenko 1.4TC DG, Kenko Extension Tubes DG 12-20, Canon Speedlite 580EX, Manfrotto Tripod!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
edrader "I am not the final word"  More info | Aug 19, 2008 13:28 | #5 Overkill wrote in post #6138485 Hmm i tried the 70-200 2.8 Hood on my 100-400 IS USM and..... at 100mm i get dark corners... i can see the hood on the picture.... so dont be cheap and buy a hood (if you own these two you should be able to buy a decent hood)!  Matt's no cheapskate .... but i do think he may be trying to make a fashion statement http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ben_r_ -POTN's Three legged Support-  15,894 posts Likes: 13 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Sacramento, CA More info | Aug 19, 2008 15:39 | #6 I hate the hood on the 100-400.... fits too snug and is wearing away the plastic a bit on the lense's hood mount. [Gear List | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thatkatmat THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 9,342 posts Gallery: 41 photos Likes: 205 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Seattle, don't move here, it's wet and cold More info | Aug 19, 2008 16:15 | #7 ed rader wrote in post #6138506 Matt's no cheapskate .... but i do think he may be trying to make a fashion statement .ed rader Wow Ed, how can you say that about me...... My Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1626 guests, 142 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
