Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 21 Aug 2008 (Thursday) 08:57
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

DVD Backup

 
Siberius
Member
Avatar
159 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: North Carolina
     
Aug 21, 2008 08:57 |  #1

Hi,

I'm hoping this is the right kind of place to ask this, not sure which other section it would fit in...

I'm backing up some pics onto DVDs today and in the past I have always made them into 'data discs' because that seemed to offer the most storage capacity.

Is that the way to go or is there another better option for saving large amounts of photos onto DVD?

Just wanted to make sure as I have quite a few ;).

Thanks in advance.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
neil_g
Senior Member
Avatar
708 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2005
Location: South, UK
     
Aug 21, 2008 09:01 |  #2

photos = data. best way to go :)


Burp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Siberius
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
159 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: North Carolina
     
Aug 21, 2008 09:15 |  #3

Many thanks, just wanted to make sure there wasn't some nifty 'fit on many photos in super quality' disc burning option I hadn't noticed ;-)a




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JohnnyG
Worthless twinkle toes fairy
Avatar
3,719 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
     
Aug 21, 2008 09:24 |  #4

Data for photos! Good question though....:D


Canon EOS 5D Mark II, 100-400IS L, 24-105 L[COLOR=black][FONT=&qu​ot] IS, 50mm f/1.4, Canon 430EX/580EX II, Kenko 1.5X, Epson R1900, Manfrotto 679B Monopod, 3021BPRO tripod, 808RC4 Head, 486RC2 Ballhead

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DepthOfField
Senior Member
Avatar
311 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
     
Aug 21, 2008 10:33 |  #5

neil_g wrote in post #6150906 (external link)
photos = data. best way to go :)

I 2nd that! :D


3X Canon 5d Mark II | Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L | Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS | Canon ES 16-35mm f/2.8L | Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX Macro | Canon 580EX II Speedlite x3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,486 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4580
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Aug 21, 2008 17:42 |  #6

I hope you are not using -RW or +RW to archive! OK for shorter term data 'backup'


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nordstern1
Goldmember
Avatar
1,303 posts
Joined Nov 2007
     
Aug 22, 2008 10:48 |  #7

are CD-R's good enough for back-up?


JOE
G10 | 5D | 40D | 17-55 2.8 IS | 16-35 2.8 L II | 24-70 2.8 L | 70-200 2.8 IS L | 85 1.2 L II | 430EX
manfrotto | tenba | crumpler | clik elite | tamrac | op/tech | blackrapid | sandisk | b+w | marumi | giottos | mac | buffalo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,486 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4580
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Aug 22, 2008 11:42 |  #8

nordstern1 wrote in post #6156427 (external link)
are CD-R's good enough for back-up?

Point 1: -RW and +RW (whether CD- or DVD- ) are inherently less stable, because they are designed to be written and rewritten...made for CHANGE!

Point 2: DVDs are burned optically at faster rates than CD, so they are inherently less stable in order to permit the lasers to write on the DVD

Point 3: There are less stable families of CD dyes, and more stable families of dyes...Taiyo Yuden uses the most stable CD dyes in the CDs they make.

Point 4: Secretive DVD manufacturers have provided far less public information about DVD dye families, and so they are a relative unknown about relative permanence.

Point 5: DVD+R is more 'stable' than DVD-R, solely due to the data encoding and error correction scheme employed, not because of any difference in dyes! While the dyes might (or might not be different) the 'stability' is due to the data encoding!

Point 6: Organic dyes are not permanent things. Organic dyes were used in color film and paper, and both are antagonized by sunlight, chemical fumes (including wood fumes!), and other agents. Organic dyes are used in optical media (CD, DVD) and are affected by the same things, although the optical media are protected somewhat better than the dyes in film and photographic paper. Organic dyes are not permanent things, so keep this thought in mind when you consider 'archival storage'!


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

845 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
DVD Backup
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2733 guests, 147 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.