Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 22 Aug 2008 (Friday) 20:38
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Softbox size?

 
Pucky
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
81 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
     
Aug 24, 2008 21:57 |  #16

maybe the dlite2 kit is something i should consider than.

do i need anything special to attach that octa to a d-lite?


http://www.PuckyBot.co​m (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eduardofrances
Senior Member
679 posts
Joined Oct 2006
     
Aug 24, 2008 22:09 |  #17

Pucky wrote in post #6171282 (external link)
maybe the dlite2 kit is something i should consider than.

do i need anything special to attach that octa to a d-lite?

If you buy the Elinchrom octa it comes with the speedring included.

If you buy it from Chimera or Photoflex you will have to buy the speedring.


http://flickr.com/phot​os/eduardofrances/ (external link) :D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DocFrankenstein
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,324 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Apr 2004
Location: where the buffalo roam
     
Aug 24, 2008 22:19 |  #18

Pucky wrote in post #6159721 (external link)
I finally have my own studio space and I'm about to order lights for shooting fashion models. I'm building an online store to sell my friend's clothing line and i'm doing the photography myself.

I'm deciding between the Elinchrom D-lite 4 kit and the Calumet Genesis 400 kit. The Elinchroms come with 2 softboxes (21" high and 25" high) but are they big enough to cover my needs (full body shots down to waist-to-neck shots)?

if its better to have larger softboxes... should i just go with the calumets and order the softboxes separately? it seems like the price would be similar to the Elinchrom kit.

For full body shots the softbox has to as big as the body - as a minimum.

Anything less and the light is not soft enough.


National Sarcasm Society. Like we need your support.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rudi
Goldmember
Avatar
3,751 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2002
Location: Australia
     
Aug 24, 2008 23:35 |  #19

DocFrankenstein wrote in post #6171416 (external link)
For full body shots the softbox has to as big as the body - as a minimum.

Anything less and the light is not soft enough.

Depends what you're going for. Generally, the larger the better, but as is the case with everything in photography (and life), there are always exceptions to the rule. It is possible to do full body shots with a softbox smaller than full body length - a shallow Octabox will spread the light more than a conventional softbox. I know plenty of people (myself included) who shoot full length portraits with softboxes smaller than full body length, and with good results.

Generalizations like yours don't help anyone.


• Wedding Photographer - Sydney and Wollongong (external link)
• Borrowed Moment (blog) (external link)

Life is uncertain. Eat dessert first.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rudi
Goldmember
Avatar
3,751 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2002
Location: Australia
     
Aug 25, 2008 06:43 |  #20

TMR Design wrote in post #6170274 (external link)
Hi Rudi,

Any chance you can do a quick test to see what the light loss is in the 53" Octa with both diffusers in place?

Just for you, Robert. Octa Midi with front diffuser placed as close as possible to 6 feet away, D-Lite4 monobloc (25Ws-400Ws), Sekonic L-358 flash meter (for those who would otherwise ask :) ), here we go:

* both diffusers in place - min power f/4.0, max power f/14
* inner diffuser only - min power f/5.0, max power f/18
* no diffusers at all - min power f/5.6, max power f/20

and just for fun

* front diffuser only - min power f/4.5, max power f/16

Hope this helps! :)


• Wedding Photographer - Sydney and Wollongong (external link)
• Borrowed Moment (blog) (external link)

Life is uncertain. Eat dessert first.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rudi
Goldmember
Avatar
3,751 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2002
Location: Australia
     
Aug 25, 2008 06:45 |  #21

Pucky wrote in post #6171282 (external link)
maybe the dlite2 kit is something i should consider than.

do i need anything special to attach that octa to a d-lite?

Have a look at my post just above this reply, make up your own mind if you can live with half the power. If you can, you get faster recycling and save a few bucks. :)


• Wedding Photographer - Sydney and Wollongong (external link)
• Borrowed Moment (blog) (external link)

Life is uncertain. Eat dessert first.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pucky
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
81 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
     
Aug 25, 2008 07:55 |  #22

Thanks Rudi. Recycling time isn't something I had took into consideration. That makes the 200s a little more desirable.


http://www.PuckyBot.co​m (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rudi
Goldmember
Avatar
3,751 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2002
Location: Australia
     
Aug 25, 2008 08:41 |  #23

They both recycle fast enough. If you're gonna need to shoot at small apertures (for enough DOF), just make sure you have enough power to do it. If the D-Lite2's are enough for what you need, great. If you ever see yourself using them with accessories that will eat up more power, or in a larger space, then you might consider the 4's. Either way, you can't go wrong. They're a great piece of kit!


• Wedding Photographer - Sydney and Wollongong (external link)
• Borrowed Moment (blog) (external link)

Life is uncertain. Eat dessert first.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
Aug 25, 2008 09:27 |  #24

Rudi wrote in post #6173075 (external link)
Just for you, Robert. Octa Midi with front diffuser placed as close as possible to 6 feet away, D-Lite4 monobloc (24Ws-400Ws), Sekonic L-358 flash meter (for those who would otherwise ask :) ), here we go:

* both diffusers in place - min power f/4.0, max power f/14
* inner diffuser only - min power f/5.0, max power f/18
* no diffusers at all - min power f/5.6, max power f/20

and just for fun

* front diffuser only - min power f/4.5, max power f/16

Hope this helps! :)

Thank you Rudi. I thought it was going to be more dramatic than that. One stop loss is common and that's cool. :D


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rudi
Goldmember
Avatar
3,751 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2002
Location: Australia
     
Aug 25, 2008 10:11 |  #25

Yup, those softboxes are pretty efficient. But you can see how shooting at f/5.6 is not a problem, right? Even with 400Ws strobes... :) Hey, what am I saying? You now HAVE 400Ws strobes! :D


• Wedding Photographer - Sydney and Wollongong (external link)
• Borrowed Moment (blog) (external link)

Life is uncertain. Eat dessert first.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tetrode
I am a walking repository of thoroughly useless information
Avatar
3,777 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jan 2006
Location: New York
     
Aug 25, 2008 11:18 |  #26

Rudi wrote in post #6174130 (external link)
:) Hey, what am I saying? You now HAVE 400Ws strobes! :D

Yeah, Robert no longer talks to us 200WS people :(

Dave F.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rudi
Goldmember
Avatar
3,751 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2002
Location: Australia
     
Aug 25, 2008 11:20 |  #27

tetrode wrote in post #6174489 (external link)
Yeah, Robert no longer talks to us 200WS people :(

Dave F.

Just wait until I get my RX600, Dave! Your calls will go unanswered... (Pretty much like now ;) :D ).


• Wedding Photographer - Sydney and Wollongong (external link)
• Borrowed Moment (blog) (external link)

Life is uncertain. Eat dessert first.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Philco
Senior Member
Avatar
940 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Nov 2005
Location: SandyEggo, CA.
     
Aug 25, 2008 15:29 |  #28

I would think a 6 or 8' V-Bank would be suitable, and perhaps cheaper to set up than buying a 6' softbox...but then I use AB heads, and hanging a box that large requires modifications that I don't want to deal with...so I'm biased. For that matter, you could shoot through a 42X72'' diffusion panel that'll cost $99 in a kit from Calumet...or buy three and build a bank...or buy your own fabric and PVC and build your own for even less. Just my $.02.


Canon 5D MKIII/Canon 5D MKII/ 70-200 F2.8 IS L / 24-70 F2.8L / 85 F1.2L II/ 35 f1.4L / 135 F2.0L / Canon 600 EX-RT X 2

[SIZE=1]r follow me on Facebook. (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DocFrankenstein
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,324 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Apr 2004
Location: where the buffalo roam
     
Aug 26, 2008 16:44 |  #29

Rudi wrote in post #6171831 (external link)
Generalizations like yours don't help anyone.

Get an ego check, my friend. You don't have the authority to speak for everybody.


National Sarcasm Society. Like we need your support.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
Aug 26, 2008 16:54 as a reply to  @ DocFrankenstein's post |  #30

I'll chime in here.

I do full body shots all the time and do not use a softbox of modifier nearly as large as the subjects I'm shooting. It's never presented a problem and I'm able to get very even lighting with only the slightest measurable falloff at the lower calves or feet, which isn't even notiecable.

If I want perfectly even light I'll use a 7' diffusion panel but I don't care for that if I'm looking for great catch lights, as the size of the panel becomes a huge said in the eye.


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,057 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
Softbox size?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2797 guests, 138 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.