Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 22 Aug 2008 (Friday) 23:49
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Rough-barked Pine

 
ImageMogul
Senior Member
Avatar
596 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Tennessee
     
Aug 22, 2008 23:49 |  #1

This rugged old pine tree has been hanging out at this pond for many a year. This spot is on Berry College Campus in Rome, Georgia (USA). Critique appreciated.

IMAGE: http://imagemogul.smugmug.com/photos/356572990_7aeZH-L.jpg

Regards - Mark

Composition can’t be reduced to a set of rules ... Dissonance has its place in photography as well as music. If we confined ourselves to major and minor scales, the blues wouldn’t exist. Rules are tools, not laws.” ~ James Martin
http://www.imagemogul.​smugmug.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joedlh
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,515 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 688
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Long Island, NY, N. America, Sol III, Orion Spur, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Cluster, Laniakea.
     
Aug 23, 2008 10:39 |  #2

Interesting subject. I think if you tried a few different things, you might come up with an image that better conveys what you're trying to say. It's clear that the tree is the subject. However, the scene to the right is a distraction. Did you include it to convey a sense of place? If so, it needs help. Perhaps if you cropped out the two shores, you'd have an interesting contrast between the rough browns of the bark and the smooth cooler colors of the water reflecting the sibling trees.

On the other hand, if you want it to be a study of the bark, I would not include the pond at all.

Also, try a different time of day. It looks like this was taken a little after or before high noon. You'd be surprised how much more compelling an image is with dramatic morning or late afternoon side-lighting.


Joe
Gear: Kodak Instamatic, Polaroid Swinger. Oh you meant gear now. :rolleyes:
http://photo.joedlh.ne​t (external link)
Editing ok

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert_Lay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,546 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA
     
Aug 23, 2008 22:20 |  #3

I feel that too much of the interesting detail is in the small area top right. The bark on the tree, which is supposedly the area of interest, is less interesting than the detail in the top right. The bark is a monotonous pattern. I think it would play better were the bark dodged in the left half of the trunk to give it more 3-dimensionality. In other words, there is too much flat lighting directly onto the bark in addition to the side-lighting. I want to see that the trunk is round, not flat.


Bob
Quality of Light (external link), Photo Tool ver 2.0 (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-f/5.6 USM; EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-f/5.6; EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM; EF 50mm f/1.4 USM; Canon Powershot G5; Canon AE1(2); Leica R4s; Battery Grip BG-E3; Pentax Digital Spotmeter with Zone VI Mod & Calibration.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

493 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
Rough-barked Pine
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2714 guests, 150 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.