Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 23 Aug 2008 (Saturday) 12:25
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Lowepro slingshot series - any experiences?

 
zetomenon
Hatchling
7 posts
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Whyalla, South Australia
     
Aug 23, 2008 12:25 |  #1

Hi,

I'm thinking about getting the Lowepro Slingshot 100AW.
The functions (as they appear on the video on the Lowepro site) suit the way I want to use a bag, as I want to be able to have it on my back, but easy to use.
I'm going for the small one because basically I only want to have a light kit with a body+lens and maybe two lenses with me (+batteries and cards) that can easily sit on my lap on public transport. I'll be leaving the charger and computer cables etc at home... Basically a tight compact way of getting round the city.

I've read a couple of reveiws that said it was good in design and function, but build quality was not good, mainly around the main shoulder strap and stitching.

I was wondering if anyone has used one?
Or if there are comparable bags that I could use instead (similar function and price)?;)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lester ­ Wareham
Moderator
Avatar
33,046 posts
Gallery: 3035 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 47415
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
     
Aug 23, 2008 13:41 |  #2

I have the 200 and 300 and love them. You can take loads of stuff in the 300 because it has a load belt.

I can't speak about the 100 but the 200 and 300 seem as well made as any other of the lowepro bags I have.

It is difficult to advise you more without knowing what you intend to carry in it. For a body and two or three lenses a small shoulder bag would probably be enough. I sometimes use a Rizo 170 AW for a body and a couple of lenses; but it feels much heavier than twice as much or more in the SS200 does.

Some shots of my bags are here for you if that is any help http://www.zen20934.ze​n.co.uk/photography/my​bags.htm (external link).


Gear List
FAQ on UV and Clear Protective Filters
Macrophotography by LordV
flickr (external link) Flickr Home (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rral22
Senior Member
885 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Saskatchewan, Canada
     
Aug 23, 2008 13:45 |  #3

I have one and use it.

It has proven to be exactly what it says it is, but it is just a little small at times. Not always, but ..... It seems solid, works in that you an swing it around and get access, but it is small, so I sometimes cram it full, and then it becomes a sort of "lump" on your back that is not great.

I use it mostly for things like a bike ride, or X-Country skiing where all I really want is to be able to carry a camera and lens, and maybe another lens. Then it works great. Good protection in some rough handling (including a couple of falls, skiing) and easy access if you want a shot.

But it's small. I think I would now have bought the 200.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bakatari
Senior Member
459 posts
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Seattle
     
Aug 23, 2008 13:57 |  #4

zetomenon wrote in post #6162742 (external link)
Hi,

I'm thinking about getting the Lowepro Slingshot 100AW.
The functions (as they appear on the video on the Lowepro site) suit the way I want to use a bag, as I want to be able to have it on my back, but easy to use.
I'm going for the small one because basically I only want to have a light kit with a body+lens and maybe two lenses with me (+batteries and cards) that can easily sit on my lap on public transport. I'll be leaving the charger and computer cables etc at home... Basically a tight compact way of getting round the city.

I've read a couple of reveiws that said it was good in design and function, but build quality was not good, mainly around the main shoulder strap and stitching.

I was wondering if anyone has used one?
Or if there are comparable bags that I could use instead (similar function and price)?;)

Will you have an opportunity to try it on in the store? The 100 is pretty small...not necessarily too small for the eqpt., but too small overall. I bought the 100 online, I returned it and got the 200. The 100 series held my eqpt. fine. It was was just too small for my body frame. It felt akward.


5d2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
azpix
Goldmember
Avatar
3,335 posts
Likes: 19
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Chandler, Arizona USA
     
Aug 24, 2008 15:24 |  #5

i've had the 100 and currently use the 200.
awesome bags.

I use it anytime i'm hiking or riding my quad.


Gear- 7d, 24-70L, sigma 70-200, Sigma 120-400, canon 50 1.4, Canon 100 2.0,sigma 10-20 and a DJI Mavic Pro Drone

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ED-EX
Mostly Lurking
17 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Westchester, NY
     
Aug 24, 2008 17:33 as a reply to  @ azpix's post |  #6

I have the 100AW but wish I had purchased something a little bigger. It was my first bag and I love it but at times you need a little more. Looking for another one now also.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dfatty
Member
185 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Zatox
     
Aug 24, 2008 23:02 as a reply to  @ ED-EX's post |  #7

I love my slingshot 100. I've only had it for about 6 weeks or so, but I haven't had any quality issues even though I've crammed it full of stuff. I usually carry the camera with a lens on it, and then 2 or 3 additional lenses.

Like others have said, I'm now considering the 200 for a little bigger size. But I plan to continue to use the 100 when I can, most of the time it's big enough.

Good luck on your choice.


Dean

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nick5
Goldmember
Avatar
3,387 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 409
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Philadelphia Suburbs
     
Aug 25, 2008 00:02 |  #8

zeto.
I would suggest the 200 for the number of lenses you have currently.
You may add more equipment in the future. I also have the 200 and the 300 for additional space when needed.


Canon 5D Mark III (x2), BG-E11 Grips, Canon Lenses 16-35 f/4 L IS, 17-40 f/4 L, 24-70 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, 70-200 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/4 L IS Version II, 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS Version II, TS-E 24 f/3.5 L II, 100 f/2.8 L Macro IS, 10-22 f3.5-4.5, 17-55 f/2.8 L IS, 85 f/1.8, Canon 1.4 Extender III, 5 Canon 600 EX-RT, 2 Canon ST-E3 Transmitters, Canon PRO-300 Printer

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bmwm3csl
Member
Avatar
78 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Houston, TX
     
Aug 25, 2008 00:30 |  #9

I orginally purchased the 200 but returned it because it was too small for my tastes and have been using the 300 for over a year now.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ibdb
TD's worst nightmare!
Avatar
6,484 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Puyallup -- Don't worry. Nobody else can pronounce it either.
     
Aug 25, 2008 00:34 as a reply to  @ Nick5's post |  #10

Which body and which lenses? It can make a significant difference.

I've had a 200 for more than 2 years, and for the most part, it's been great. I used it extensively with a 20D + 24-105 mounted, a 580EX, 70-200 f/4, and some combination of two other smaller lenses. That's probably more than I should carry in it, not for size, but for weight. After a long day of shooting and running around, the single shoulder strap can be uncomfortable. After a long weekend, it's particularly noticeable.

The Slingshot bags function best when they're not crammed full. You want to have room to access everything quickly, without a whole lot of juggling and shuffling other stuff around. Sure, you can cram more stuff into one, but then you lose the quick and easy convenience they provide.

I've looked at the 300 and, for me, that's too big for a bag of this style. The 200 seems about perfect, and the 100 could be a bit tight.


-David
"David raises a good point. . ." -- CDS
"Once again, David Raises a good point! :lol:" The Wise and Powerful CDS
Gear List | Proof I Use The Gear In My Gear List (not necessarily proof I use it well) (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
zetomenon
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
7 posts
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Whyalla, South Australia
     
Aug 25, 2008 19:19 as a reply to  @ ibdb's post |  #11

Thanks for your help, guys.

I'm probably going to go for the 100 to start because i need something light and compact to take on a plane, and my kit is small right now. Later when i need to (read: when I buy more lenses and toys) i'll get the larger one and have two bags to switch between depending on what I'm doing that day.

Cheers




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ben_r_
-POTN's Three legged Support-
Avatar
15,894 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Aug 25, 2008 19:54 |  #12

I didnt really like them. Had the 300 and sold it. IMO is was too difficult to get the camera in and out "quickly" like they advertise. I perfer the Flipside backpacks more as I can access the entire bag contents without taking the bag off. I Currently have the flipside 400 AW but liked the 300 a lot too.


[Gear List | Flickr (external link) | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection (external link) /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
midnight_rider
"Thrown under the bus."
Avatar
5,413 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Yonder by the crick, Ga
     
Aug 25, 2008 20:13 as a reply to  @ ben_r_'s post |  #13

I had the 200 and did not really like it. It was a great bag but I had to take it off to get to some of my lenses. I went to the lowepro flipside 300 and Love it.


I never, Not once claimed to read your post...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nick5
Goldmember
Avatar
3,387 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 409
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Philadelphia Suburbs
     
Aug 25, 2008 22:31 |  #14

Midnight.
Don't you have to take off the Flipside to access the storage area?


Canon 5D Mark III (x2), BG-E11 Grips, Canon Lenses 16-35 f/4 L IS, 17-40 f/4 L, 24-70 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, 70-200 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/4 L IS Version II, 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS Version II, TS-E 24 f/3.5 L II, 100 f/2.8 L Macro IS, 10-22 f3.5-4.5, 17-55 f/2.8 L IS, 85 f/1.8, Canon 1.4 Extender III, 5 Canon 600 EX-RT, 2 Canon ST-E3 Transmitters, Canon PRO-300 Printer

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ben_r_
-POTN's Three legged Support-
Avatar
15,894 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Aug 25, 2008 22:54 |  #15

Nick5 wrote in post #6178381 (external link)
Midnight.
Don't you have to take off the Flipside to access the storage area?

Nope, you just buckle the waist strap, rotate it around the to front of you, then you can easily unzip the back part of the bag and youre in with access to everything, not just one body and lens, but all your lenses in the bag.

This is the back of the bag (the part that touched your back while wearing it):

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

[Gear List | Flickr (external link) | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection (external link) /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,497 views & 0 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it.
Lowepro slingshot series - any experiences?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2625 guests, 152 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.