Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 25 Aug 2008 (Monday) 00:19
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Best Lens for EOS 300d i low light situations

 
rickarnold
Hatchling
1 post
Joined Aug 2008
     
Aug 25, 2008 00:19 |  #1

I am shooting with a Canon 300d. I travel a lot and have to shoot mostly handheld and often in low light situations. The standard lens that comes with the 300d is not that good. I want to replace it with a pro or prosumer model. Based on my requirements I would like to know what you recommend as the best lens. It needs to be a zoom lens some where in the range of 18mm - 75mm give or take. Size is also a factor - the smaller the better. My budget is $1000 or under and I would really like to know what is the best in the $200 - $300 range.

Thanks in advance,

Rick




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
form
"inadequately equipped"
Avatar
4,929 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Henderson, NV
     
Aug 25, 2008 00:26 |  #2

Best lens for low light? 50mm f/1.0. Best in your budget? Maybe 50 f/1.4 or 85 f/1.8 (or both).

Best zoom lens in your budget? Canon 17-55 f/2.8 IS or Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 (excellent alternative to the Canon model).


Las Vegas Wedding Photographer: http://www.joeyallenph​oto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Photon ­ Phil
Goldmember
Avatar
1,763 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Capturing Photons in Wisconsin
     
Aug 25, 2008 00:29 |  #3

sharpest.... Tamron 28-75 2.8


Bodies: SONY A850 / Pentax K100D / D70 (18-55VR, 55-200)
Primes: Minolta 28 ff2.8 / Minolta 50 f1.7 / Minolta 50 f2.8 Macro
Zooms: 35-70 f4 / 100-200 f4.5 Lights: AB800 / AB400 & CSRB's
Classics:
Pentax Super Tak 50 f1.4 / Pentax SMC 50 f1.4,f1.7,f2.0

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
form
"inadequately equipped"
Avatar
4,929 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Henderson, NV
     
Aug 25, 2008 00:34 |  #4

I think the 17-50 is sharper than the 28-75. I own the 28-75 and find it a little bit dull at wider apertures. www.the-digital-picture.com (external link) agrees with me in their lens performance tests.


Las Vegas Wedding Photographer: http://www.joeyallenph​oto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
egordon99
Cream of the Crop
10,247 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philly 'burbs
     
Aug 25, 2008 08:27 as a reply to  @ form's post |  #5

If you want something small, you'll have to go with a prime lens. Look Canon's 50mm f/1.8, 50mm f/1.4, 28mm f/1.8, 85mm f/1.8 or Sigma's 30mm f/1.4.

If you want a zoom, you'll have to settle for f/2.8 and either the Tamron 17-50mm or 28-75mm in your price range. You won't be able to get anything fast in the 18-75mm range.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kitacanon
Goldmember
4,706 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 36
Joined Sep 2006
Location: West Palm Beach
     
Aug 25, 2008 12:18 |  #6

Since you're not happy with the kit lens, I'd upgrade that to the new 18-55mm IS before getting a prime. IS will give you low light capability, and the better optics of the new IS kit will improve all your shots...


My Canon kit 450D/s90; Canon lenses 18-55 IS, 70-210/3.5-4.5....Nikon kit: D610; 28-105/3.5-4.5, 75-300/4.5-5.6 AF, 50/1.8D Nikkors, Tamron 80-210; MF Nikkors: 50/2K, 50/1.4 AI-S, 50/1.8 SeriesE, 60/2.8 Micro Nikkor (AF locked), 85mm/1.8K-AI, 105/2.5 AIS/P.C, 135/2.8K/Q.C, 180/2.8 ED, 200/4Q/AIS, 300/4.5H-AI, ++ Tamron 70-210/3.8-4, Vivitar/Kiron 28/2, ser.1 70-210/3.5, ser.1 28-90; Vivitar/Komine and Samyang 28/2.8; 35mm Nikon F/FM/FE2, Rebel 2K...HTC RE UWA camera

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bsaber
I have no idea what's going on
Avatar
3,536 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     
Aug 25, 2008 13:18 |  #7

kitacanon wrote in post #6174807 (external link)
Since you're not happy with the kit lens, I'd upgrade that to the new 18-55mm IS before getting a prime. IS will give you low light capability, and the better optics of the new IS kit will improve all your shots...

If you're not shooting action then the new IS kit lens would work great for you at a low price. However, I recommend a good prime like the 85 1.8, 50 1.8, 50 1.4, or 35 f/2. Otherwise, the Tamron 17-50 or Canon 17-55 IS would be the best choices.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kitacanon
Goldmember
4,706 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 36
Joined Sep 2006
Location: West Palm Beach
     
Aug 26, 2008 08:46 |  #8

bsaber wrote in post #6175186 (external link)
If you're not shooting action then the new IS kit lens would work great for you at a low price. However, I recommend a good prime like the 85 1.8, 50 1.8, 50 1.4, or 35 f/2. Otherwise, the Tamron 17-50 or Canon 17-55 IS would be the best choices.

I agree...


My Canon kit 450D/s90; Canon lenses 18-55 IS, 70-210/3.5-4.5....Nikon kit: D610; 28-105/3.5-4.5, 75-300/4.5-5.6 AF, 50/1.8D Nikkors, Tamron 80-210; MF Nikkors: 50/2K, 50/1.4 AI-S, 50/1.8 SeriesE, 60/2.8 Micro Nikkor (AF locked), 85mm/1.8K-AI, 105/2.5 AIS/P.C, 135/2.8K/Q.C, 180/2.8 ED, 200/4Q/AIS, 300/4.5H-AI, ++ Tamron 70-210/3.8-4, Vivitar/Kiron 28/2, ser.1 70-210/3.5, ser.1 28-90; Vivitar/Komine and Samyang 28/2.8; 35mm Nikon F/FM/FE2, Rebel 2K...HTC RE UWA camera

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dave.H
Senior Member
Avatar
707 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Indianapolis
     
Aug 26, 2008 08:54 as a reply to  @ kitacanon's post |  #9

Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 is a fantastic lens and will leave you with plenty of money left over for another lens. If you need faster than that at times then you can pick up the 50mm 1.8 or 1.4 with the money left over, the 1.8 is pocket change compared to the other lenses. If you need more on the telephoto end and less on the wide then get the 28-75 tamron.


Canon 40D | EF-S 10-22 f/3.5-4.5 | EF 24-70 L f/2.8 | EF 50 f/1.8 | EF 70-200 L f/2.8 | [COLOR=navy]EF 100 f/2.8L Macro | 430EXhttp://www.davidhaughs​.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,057 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Best Lens for EOS 300d i low light situations
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2761 guests, 151 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.