Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 25 Aug 2008 (Monday) 20:41
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

B&W False Creek Pano

 
LeuceDeuce
Goldmember
Avatar
2,362 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver BC, Canada
     
Aug 25, 2008 20:41 |  #1

Ok I'm open to any critique, but I'm specifically requesting critique on the black and white conversion. I know it's a little dark, does this work? Should I be trying for more even distributions of tone? I really need help with my black & white photography. Thank you for any responses.

Edit: Removed original from flickr


my website: Light & Shadow (external link)
my flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LeuceDeuce
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,362 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver BC, Canada
     
Aug 25, 2008 20:49 |  #2

Or should I go for something closer to this, with less contrast and more even tone distribution (I lose a little cloud detail). Possibly combine the sky and ground?
I'm just not sure what the ideal to achieve in b&w is...
_


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


my website: Light & Shadow (external link)
my flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LeuceDeuce
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,362 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver BC, Canada
     
Aug 25, 2008 20:53 as a reply to  @ LeuceDeuce's post |  #3

The mix:
_


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


my website: Light & Shadow (external link)
my flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Boehme
Enjoy being spanked
Avatar
7,359 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 89
Joined Jan 2007
Location: DFW Metro-mess, Texas
     
Aug 25, 2008 21:01 as a reply to  @ LeuceDeuce's post |  #4

I vote for #3.

When we were in Vancouver early this summer we noticed that Vancouver seems to be the summer nesting grounds for the elusive Construction Crane. Sightings have become increasingly scarce around here and I was afraid that it might be headed for the endangered species list, but it seems to be alive and prospering in Vancouver.


Atmospheric haze in images? Click for Tutorial to Reduce Atmospheric Haze with Photoshop.
Gear List .... Gallery: Woodturner Bill (external link)
Donate to Support POTN Operating Costs

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
photoguy6405
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,399 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 31
Joined Feb 2008
Location: US Midwest
     
Aug 25, 2008 21:43 |  #5

The mix. Hands down.


Website: Iowa Landscape Photography (external link) | Blog (external link) | Gear List & Feedback
Equipment For Sale: Canon PowerShot A95

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tylershumway
Member
Avatar
63 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Traverse City, MI
     
Aug 25, 2008 22:30 as a reply to  @ photoguy6405's post |  #6

I would vote the mix as well. The image really improved when you allowed more midtones (and really less black), a lot of detail was revealed. I think a lot of what black and white photography is, is the balancing of tones. The interactions/transitio​ns of the tonal values with each other really seperates a good b/w from a great b/w. The only thing I would try to change now is the halo on the horizon, its a little distracting.


www.tylershumwayphotog​raphy.com (external link)

www.flickr.com/photos/​tylershumway (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Flo
Gimmie Some Lovin
Avatar
44,987 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Nanaimo,B.C.
     
Aug 25, 2008 22:53 as a reply to  @ tylershumway's post |  #7

Mix, and I am not seeing a halo:confused:


you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LeuceDeuce
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,362 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver BC, Canada
     
Aug 25, 2008 23:11 as a reply to  @ Flo's post |  #8

Appreciate all the comments folks. I kinda figured the mix was the way to go. I didn't like losing the sky in the low contrast version, but the higher contrast sky killed the ground.

Not quite sure about the halo you're seeing though. Not saying it isn't there, I'm just not seeing it. It could be remnents from a quick and dirty layer blend.


my website: Light & Shadow (external link)
my flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
-g-
Horribly disfigured but learning to cope
12,520 posts
Likes: 32
Joined Dec 2007
     
Aug 25, 2008 23:12 as a reply to  @ Flo's post |  #9

My vote's for number 3 as well. As a PS guru, I'm sure you've already dodged and burned the clouds.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LeuceDeuce
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,362 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver BC, Canada
     
Aug 25, 2008 23:18 |  #10

genodm wrote in post #6178664 (external link)
My vote's for number 3 as well. As a PS guru, I'm sure you've already dodged and burned the clouds.

Actually I didn't. I used the Black & White conversion and played with the sliders until I found a nice mix.

I've replaced my flickr photo so the original is no longer available.

On the full size image I'll probably visit it with some dodge & burn to see if I can breath more life into it.

B&W is way harder than colour :confused:


my website: Light & Shadow (external link)
my flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LeuceDeuce
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,362 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver BC, Canada
     
Aug 25, 2008 23:19 |  #11

bill boehme wrote in post #6177760 (external link)
When we were in Vancouver early this summer we noticed that Vancouver seems to be the summer nesting grounds for the elusive Construction Crane.

Isn't the construction around here crazy? It's so hard to get a nice skyline right now. Once they finish the Olympic Village behind Science World there, the view is going to be something else.


my website: Light & Shadow (external link)
my flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
-g-
Horribly disfigured but learning to cope
12,520 posts
Likes: 32
Joined Dec 2007
     
Aug 25, 2008 23:35 |  #12

LeuceDeuce wrote in post #6178709 (external link)
Actually I didn't. I used the Black & White conversion and played with the sliders until I found a nice mix.

I've replaced my flickr photo so the original is no longer available.

On the full size image I'll probably visit it with some dodge & burn to see if I can breath more life into it.

B&W is way harder than colour :confused:

Grab Gorman's action for B&W.

http://www.atncentral.​com/Zip_Actions/gorman​bw.zip (external link)

I find I like to change the fill layer to something a little lighter and sometimes play with the curves a bit as well.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LeuceDeuce
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,362 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver BC, Canada
     
Aug 25, 2008 23:53 |  #13

genodm wrote in post #6178831 (external link)
Grab Gorman's action for B&W.

http://www.atncentral.​com/Zip_Actions/gorman​bw.zip (external link)

I find I like to change the fill layer to something a little lighter and sometimes play with the curves a bit as well.

Thanks Geno, I'll give this one a try.


my website: Light & Shadow (external link)
my flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

902 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
B&W False Creek Pano
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2722 guests, 152 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.