pixelharmony wrote in post #6188646
I always debated this as well. Should I beat around the bush and look for praise? Or should I be direct when the photos clearly don't look polished enough.
I think in a forum there's a balance of encouragement and critiques. I for one love when people tell me what I did wrong or how to improve my shot. I'd rather have someone take their time and tell me you need to do this this and that. Rather than just say "BEAUTIFUL" and leave it at that.
I don't think anyone maliciously critiques any poster here, we're all trying to help one another.
PIXEL - Thanks for your feedback. I did not get any full length images of teh Bridge in her dress, let alone with the groom. The positioning I was limited to (so as to not interfere with the paid photographer) limited my areas of operation and well, it was just difficult. Not to mention a little awkward to ask the bride and groom to pose here or there, this way or that way, when the photographer had them wrapped up for the most part. So, I was trying to be respectful while taking as many as possible of what i could. Sometimes, lighting wasn't th ebest, background was even worse, and composition was off. Even if I had the couple dead center of the front patio of the mansion they wer ein, the street behin dthem was a nicely filled car lot across the street. So, only a very shallow depth of field would eliminate that. And as for other pics, I just didn't want to walk behind the photographer and capitalize on his work. It was out of respect, even though I had the golden pass from the Father.
Hey, I know my shots were tight, but for those images, that is what I was purposely looking for to eliminate the crappy backgrounds. So, although too tight, it was for a specifc reason. But if I had a chance i would have got some portraits with full gown....I just never got the chance.....
Thanks for all the comments and critiques. I appreciate all of them!
(Good, bad, indifferent)