Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 25 Aug 2008 (Monday) 23:15
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

PHOTOS: My first FREE Wedding Support

 
madmanscam
Member
79 posts
Joined Nov 2007
     
Sep 02, 2008 07:05 |  #31

Nice shots but not pop ....i feel theyre like the usual hired photographer run of the mill shots.


EOS 5D/ EOD 7D/ EOS 30D / Sigma 10-20 EX F/4-5.6 / Sigma 17-70 F/2.8-4.5 / Canon EF 50mm F/1.8 Mk II / Canon EF 85mm F/1.8 USM / Canon EF 70-200L F/2.8 USM / Sigma 50-500 EX F/4-6.3
Canon 580EX / Lowepro Computrekker Plus AW

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Maxxum5
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
345 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2008
     
Sep 02, 2008 12:14 |  #32

madmanscam wrote in post #6224599 (external link)
Nice shots but not pop ....i feel theyre like the usual hired photographer run of the mill shots.

That's ok....At least I wasn't "HIRED" Hahahahaha...... I was second set of lens off to teh side. So my positioning was limited. I agree that there is no "POP" as you call it after I seen the "Before & After" imaged edits by the members. Now I know how to use teh CS3 in layers, LIGHTS/DARKS as per EDIKS video tutorial etc.....

I can only hope to get better in time.

Thanks for the feedback.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ishootpeoplewithmycanon
Senior Member
Avatar
286 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: Oregon
     
Sep 02, 2008 23:00 |  #33

Is it just me or does the white balance look off? alot of them look really blue. Try to adjust your white balance and that will help. Also make sure you never chop limbs. Thats my 2 cents hope it helps. keep workin on it, if you tweek just little things you wil be on the right track




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rascalphoto
Senior Member
Avatar
380 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: S.W. Washington state
     
Sep 03, 2008 02:25 |  #34

I like both edits, but with edik's some areas are definitely over sharpened, such as skin.

About the Wacom, get one, you won't regret it, and you'll wonder how you ever managed without one. No matter what size or model it's better than a mouse!


Randy
http://fosterphotograp​hix.smugmug.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Maxxum5
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
345 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2008
     
Sep 03, 2008 19:06 |  #35

Ishootpeoplewithmycano​n wrote in post #6230115 (external link)
Is it just me or does the white balance look off? alot of them look really blue. Try to adjust your white balance and that will help. Also make sure you never chop limbs. Thats my 2 cents hope it helps. keep workin on it, if you tweek just little things you wil be on the right track

You know what? I Just spent like, 6 hours editing over 800 photos taken at an Autocross because almost every image had an excessive amount of blues. I was adjusting in CS3 about -40 for each. What should my white balance be set at? I had it on AUTO for all the pics, but is there a set "outdoor" KELVIN I should be using? Hmmm. This is interesting since you noticed that, and my fingers are bleeding from all the adjustments.....

Thanks for noticing




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ishootpeoplewithmycanon
Senior Member
Avatar
286 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: Oregon
     
Sep 04, 2008 13:08 |  #36

Maxxum5 wrote in post #6235653 (external link)
You know what? I Just spent like, 6 hours editing over 800 photos taken at an Autocross because almost every image had an excessive amount of blues. I was adjusting in CS3 about -40 for each. What should my white balance be set at? I had it on AUTO for all the pics, but is there a set "outdoor" KELVIN I should be using? Hmmm. This is interesting since you noticed that, and my fingers are bleeding from all the adjustments.....

Thanks for noticing

Maybe I am inerpreting your text wrong but for some reason you sound like you are upset that I said that. I didnt mean anything personal, just trying to call it how I see it. I dont blow smoke up peoples behinds becasue I dont want people to do that to me, it doesnt help.
As for all the PP youve done, that is just a part of weddings, lots off PP can go into a wedding. In fact you could potentially spend more time doing that than actually shooting the wedding. Thats just life in the wedding business.
Also when you expose properly it will cit back on the PP. Just part of the learning process that everyone has to go through, I am still learning that. It takes time.
if you werent meaning that comment rudely than disregard this message, but if you did then I wont comment on your photos anymore because like I said I am not going to give critique to someone who doesnt want it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Maxxum5
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
345 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2008
     
Sep 04, 2008 15:33 |  #37

Ishootpeoplewithmycano​n wrote in post #6240542 (external link)
Maybe I am inerpreting your text wrong but for some reason you sound like you are upset that I said that. I didnt mean anything personal, just trying to call it how I see it. I dont blow smoke up peoples behinds becasue I dont want people to do that to me, it doesnt help.
As for all the PP youve done, that is just a part of weddings, lots off PP can go into a wedding. In fact you could potentially spend more time doing that than actually shooting the wedding. Thats just life in the wedding business.
Also when you expose properly it will cit back on the PP. Just part of the learning process that everyone has to go through, I am still learning that. It takes time.
if you werent meaning that comment rudely than disregard this message, but if you did then I wont comment on your photos anymore because like I said I am not going to give critique to someone who doesnt want it.

No....You are fine....I was just responding to your comment that after reading what you wrote I had invested so much time adjusting the BLUES myself. So it was very coincidental. No harm...I didn't take it out of context. Thanks for at least clarifying when there was no need.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,219 views & 0 likes for this thread, 18 members have posted to it.
PHOTOS: My first FREE Wedding Support
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur
1050 guests, 178 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.