Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 26 Aug 2008 (Tuesday) 11:14
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Which 18-55 to buy? Mark II for $50 or IS for $130?

 
fritzk3
Member
240 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2007
     
Aug 26, 2008 11:14 |  #1

Hey all,

I have the opportunity to buy a used 18-55 EF-S II kit lens for $50, or the other option would be to buy a new 18-55 IS lens from Amazon's seller base for $130.

I've just bought an XTi body and this, along with a Nifty Fifty, will be my first lenses and will be the first time owning a dSLR.

Is the IS version of the 18-55 lens worth the extra $80?


Canon 40D • EF-S 18-55 IS • EF-S 55-250 IS EF 28-135 IS USM EF 50/1.8 EF 85/1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike
ugly when I'm sober
Avatar
15,398 posts
Gallery: 51 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 393
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Canterbury/Ramsgate, UK
     
Aug 26, 2008 11:19 |  #2

I would think that IS would be worth the extra - it gives you the ability to hand hold at lower shutter speeds. I've never used the IS version though.


www.mikegreenphotograp​hy.co.uk (external link)
Gear
UK South Easterners
flickr (external link) Insta1 (external link) Insta2 (external link)

A closed mouth gathers no foot.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lukeap69
Goldmember
Avatar
1,206 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: Near the desert
     
Aug 26, 2008 13:36 |  #3

Go for the IS not only because of the IS. Lots of people are saying IQ wise, IS version is much much better.


Arnold
Speedlite / Speedlight / Sunpak 120J Beauty Dish Rig (external link)
Gear
my Google+ Profile (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dawid
Senior Member
258 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Poland and Kansas City
     
Aug 26, 2008 14:12 |  #4

The IS version is infinitely better. It is a great deal for the price, and the non IS 18-55 is pretty much worthless.

Do it and don't look back.


Gripper 5D, Gripped 20D, Canon 10-22, Sigma 50 1.4, Sigma 24-70, Pentax K1000, cardboard boxes....
FC RX7, Subaru Legacy rally car.
"Don't be that guy"- Steve

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
klynam
Goldmember
Avatar
1,237 posts
Joined Oct 2004
Location: Photopolis
     
Aug 26, 2008 14:43 |  #5

Another IS vote here. Had both, sold my non-IS.


Canon Cameras & Lenses | Masterworks Photography (external link) | God is Light
"Until you can do better, copy." Tony Gresham

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
xarqi
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,435 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Aotearoa/New Zealand
     
Aug 26, 2008 15:24 as a reply to  @ klynam's post |  #6

Dawid wrote in post #6183297 (external link)
The IS version is infinitely better. It is a great deal for the price, and the non IS 18-55 is pretty much worthless.

Do it and don't look back.

My sentiments, exactly.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tee ­ Why
"Monkey's uncle"
Avatar
10,596 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Pasadena, CA
     
Aug 26, 2008 18:04 |  #7

Get the IS version, much better lens and more than worth the price difference.


Gallery: http://tomyi.smugmug.c​om/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jimmer411
Thank god Im green.
866 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Pacific, WA
     
Aug 26, 2008 19:53 |  #8

IS by far.


5D3 | Sigma 30mm f/1.4 HSM | EF 85mm f/1.8 USM | EF 24-70 f/2.8L II | EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS II | 430EX | YN-568EX II | YN-622c | YN-622-TX |
Selling Sigma 30mm 1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tony ­ rage
Senior Member
Avatar
699 posts
Likes: 28
Joined Jan 2008
Location: orlando, Fl
     
Aug 26, 2008 20:00 |  #9

IS... I hope you figured this out by now


5Dc * 1DMkII * 40D * 24-70 2.8 * 85 1.8 * and more!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rubberhead
Goldmember
Avatar
1,899 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2006
Location: South Carolina's Lowcountry
     
Aug 26, 2008 20:26 |  #10

tony rage wrote in post #6185572 (external link)
IS... I hope you figured this out by now

Add one more to the pile..


EQUIPMENT: 40D | Rebel XT | EF 70-200mm f/4L IS | EF-S 10-22mm | EF 28-135mm IS | EF-S 18-55mm IS | EF 50mm 1.8 - flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Keduf
Member
222 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Victoria, Australia
     
Aug 27, 2008 08:33 as a reply to  @ Rubberhead's post |  #11

I had the non IS and replaced it with IS...MUCH happier with IS!


Kerry
My flickr (external link)
5DMKII I 50D I 350D I Sigma 10-20 f4-5.6 I Canon 24-105 f/4L IS I Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 I Canon 50 f/1.8 I Canon 70-200 f/4L I Canon 50 f/1.4 I Canon 100 f/2.8 macro I Olympus OM-D E-M10II I Olympus 14-42mm F3.5-5.6 II R I Olympus 17 f/2.8 I Olympus 9 f/8.0

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
alduin
Senior Member
Avatar
915 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
     
Aug 27, 2008 09:28 |  #12

The 18-55 IS is a great all-around lens. IQ wise, it's a much better value for your dollar than the non-IS version.


7D+BG-E7 | 5D | G9 | 24-70 f/2.8L | 70-200 f/2.8L IS | 100-400L IS | 10-22mm | 50mm f/1.4 | 580EX II | 430EX II | YN565EX
Manfrotto 055XPROB/488RC2 | 680B/234RC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shaggymatt
Senior Member
555 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: South Central, PA
     
Aug 27, 2008 10:52 |  #13

(Mine whichever it may be when it arrives. Have a 20D coming Friday probably that has one of the 18-55's lenses).

In reality, the IS. :)


Pelican 1614
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
engrmariano
Senior Member
Avatar
793 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Pinoy in SG
     
Aug 27, 2008 11:11 |  #14

+1 on IS. worth the extra money.


The Filipino is worth dying for -> Ninoy (Nov. 27, '32 - Aug. 21, '83)
I'm ready to defend the 3 stars & the sun -> Francis M. (Oct 4, '64 – Mar 6, '09)

fLickr (external link)
geavity (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eelnoraa
Goldmember
1,798 posts
Likes: 37
Joined May 2007
     
Aug 27, 2008 16:03 as a reply to  @ engrmariano's post |  #15

If budget allow, get one with IS anytime, for any lens. Once you use IS, and go back to non-IS, you will realized how important and useful it is.

As for the kit lens, the IS version no only has IS, but also build much better. Definitely worth the additional $$


5Di, 5Diii, 28, 50, 85, 16-35II, 24-105, 70-200F2.8 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,757 views & 0 likes for this thread, 19 members have posted to it.
Which 18-55 to buy? Mark II for $50 or IS for $130?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
855 guests, 163 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.