And this:
Rangefinder Design. From the beginning of their appearance in cameras, rangefinders varied in design. While they all depended on bringing two images into coincidence, they used different optical designs and the images created differed. Split-field rangefinders create a view in which the top half is from one window and the bottom half from the other. The superimposed viewfinder produces a window within a window with the smaller rectangle or triangle being produced from one rangefinder window within a larger image from the other window. Focusing brings these images into coincidence.
While the drawing above would suggest that split-field and superimposed rangefinders would do the job equally well, the difference in engineering strategies necessary to implement the designs meant that they did not perform equally well. Magnification could be added to the split-field type rangefinder to make the image more visible and to sharpen the point of division between image halves. The exact position of the eye relative to the finder was critical, however, and the magnification used made them difficult to combine with viewfinders, which were usually minified. This design works well when focusing on images with distinct vertical elements; in a scene with mostly horizontal elements, the camera must be turned diagonally or vertically, disrupting whatever the user might have done to compose the picture in the viewfinder. Superimposed rangefinders seemed more intuitive to users and could be more easily integrated into viewfinder systems. Since either the larger or smaller window was colored to increase the contrast between the two, superimposed rangefinders were usually darker than their split-image counterparts.
| HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO |
Closed the window before I got the link, but it was on prairientet.org