Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Still Life, B/W & Experimental 
Thread started 27 Aug 2008 (Wednesday) 03:44
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Long Exposures of the night sky...[help]

 
sintax
Member
Avatar
50 posts
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Tampa/Port Richey, FL
     
Aug 27, 2008 03:44 |  #1

First try ever using BULB setting - hooked to my laptop via USB using EOS Utility w/ Manual Mode, I love how the pictures came out but I noticed they have this tiny red pixel on them all, I cropped/zoomed/circled one of them to point it out.. Anyone know what this migt be ? I checked some other exposues from a week ago [which are all 30s exposures no remote cap] and they are fine, no spot! C&C on the pics! and some advice on the spot plase.

the spot:

IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3206/2801924517_1c1379f822_o.jpg
Shot 1:
IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3279/2801924375_15032578a5_o.jpg
Shot 2:
IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3049/2801924163_51bed8c8c8_o.jpg
Shot 3:
IMAGE: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2258/2801924731_3ccebf9554_o.jpg
Here is a link to the full sized pictre unedited, you can see two red spots on here actually:

http://farm4.static.fl​ickr.com …01935359_b51e2a​becb_o.jpg (external link)

http://www.flickr.com/​photos/BrandonQ/sets/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bowtie`
Senior Member
488 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Likes: 70
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Indiana, USA
     
Aug 27, 2008 07:36 |  #2

You only have red spots? Must be a fairly new camera. You need some of the blue spots also. You could also use some of the Maltese cross white ones for fun also. THese are hot/cold pixels ( red and blue ). The white crosses are dead pixels. WIth time and age you will see these. The clone tool will be your friend. The spots are tiny enough (pixel size) that they will not degrade your image. Breath deep, take more pics!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sintax
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
50 posts
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Tampa/Port Richey, FL
     
Aug 27, 2008 13:01 |  #3

Haha I need some blue and white cross! Nice one, but yes it is a brand new rebel XSI. This is normal for all pics or just long exposures?


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/BrandonQ/sets/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kento
Goldmember
Avatar
1,207 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Innsbruck, Austria
     
Aug 27, 2008 13:04 as a reply to  @ sintax's post |  #4

Have you already ruled out Aliens?


My Tools
-Jesse
Unknown-Studio.com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
canonloader
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
52,911 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 135
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Behind A Camera
     
Aug 27, 2008 13:28 |  #5

It's more normal for long exposures than all exposures. And you will see more of them in a dark sky than a daylight shot.


Mitch- ____...^.^...____
Gear List, My You Tube (external link)
War is not about who's right, it's about who's left.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
61ache
Senior Member
Avatar
330 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Location: St. Paul MN
     
Aug 27, 2008 13:49 |  #6

Long exposure. You can setup your camera so that it will automagically remove most of noise, dust, etc on long exposures.


/Canon 50D/EF 50mm f1.4 USM/EF-S 10-22 f3.5-4.5/EF 85mm f1.8/

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sintax
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
50 posts
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Tampa/Port Richey, FL
     
Aug 27, 2008 13:59 |  #7

61ache wrote in post #6190707 (external link)
Long exposure. You can setup your camera so that it will automagically remove most of noise, dust, etc on long exposures.

Yeah i think i figured that out not long ago i just decided to review some of the Custom Fn.s in the menu and remembered the high iso noise reduc and long exp noise reduc, i tried it out and it seems flawless now, just takes ten times longer to do like a 30 min exposure lol


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/BrandonQ/sets/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sintax
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
50 posts
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Tampa/Port Richey, FL
     
Aug 28, 2008 01:10 |  #8

out of curiousity... what is the best recommended way to take long exposures of the sky? i'm on auto ISO, F/3.5 , BULB, Auto White Balance.. and set on 18mm, focused all the way out.. would adjusting the white balance possibly make the stars stronger in the picture?


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/BrandonQ/sets/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
canonloader
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
52,911 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 135
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Behind A Camera
     
Aug 28, 2008 06:12 |  #9

Try ISO 1600, f/3.5, and 20" or 30" and the smallest mm you can zoom to, even less than 18mm if you have it. With long exposures, anything over 30" and you will start to get elongated stars, as you can see in the above shots if you blow them up a bit. AWB should be fine.

I bought a small equatorial mount (external link) and motor drive (external link) for it for just over $100 for both that will hold my 40D and Tokina 12-24 and when it is set up right, will turn with the rotation of the earth, allowing much longer exposures without streaking. Haven't tried it yet though cause it's been too hazy at night here. :)


Mitch- ____...^.^...____
Gear List, My You Tube (external link)
War is not about who's right, it's about who's left.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,684 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Long Exposures of the night sky...[help]
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Still Life, B/W & Experimental 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur
863 guests, 148 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.