Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
Thread started 27 Aug 2008 (Wednesday) 12:42
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Woo hoo Alamy!

 
fortisi876
Senior Member
493 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Dec 2006
Location: NNJ
     
Dec 28, 2008 21:13 |  #301

Anke wrote in post #6957923 (external link)
No, as long as the uncompressed size is over 48MB and the compression is saved at level 11 or 12.

OK I got you,,,thnx!

I never realized when you open a jpg image up in PS that it uncompresses automatically...never really payed much attention to the file size while working on it. :oops:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LCF
Goldmember
Avatar
2,121 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
     
Dec 29, 2008 07:20 |  #302

ChrisRabior wrote in post #6947331 (external link)
I was lurking in the Shutterstock forums, and there's someone boasting about being right on par with a 10k gross earnings for the year, with somewhere around 5300 images in his portfolio. It's gaining all sorts of ooh's and ahh's from the other contributors. Pity they don't see how much it devalues their work.

This guy's $10,000 at SS's most profitable payout rate would pan out to 26,315 sales, likely less due to the $20 EL offerings and direct purchasing, so likely closer to 20-23k with some special download licensing.

My seven sales this year through Alamy were over $1k. If that trend continued, it would only take me 40 sales to equal this guy's 20k+ sales. Plus, considering how buyers don't want to use the same thing everyone else is using, my 40 are going to be a lot less noticeable than his 20k+. More and more happy with Alamy every day.

Oh btw, their most recent QC time for me was a matter of hours. Looks like they finally caught up on their back log =)

You might not know that all those not posting to bash him and his 5000 pictures don't do it either not to get banned or hurt his feelings..
His "work" is beyond crap :rolleyes:


[newonlineportfolio:www.cyrilhou.com (external link)] [gear] [flickr (external link)]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kosin
Goldmember
Avatar
2,098 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 211
Joined Jun 2007
Location: NJ
     
Dec 29, 2008 11:30 |  #303

Great thread. Thank you OP for starting it and the rest of you to participate and sharing the info :)

I subscribed to Alamy 2 days ago and just passed QC...
Now, I have a simple questions regarding keywording:
Do you use different keywords for "Main keywords" and "Comprehensive keywords" or the same ones?
Is it appropriate to leave "Comprehensive keywords" blank?


Greg Gard
=> www.greggard.com (external link)
follow me on Instagram: https://www.instagram.​com/greggardphoto/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Anke
"that rump shot is just adorable"
UK SE Photographer of the Year 2009
Avatar
30,454 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Royal Tunbridge Wells, UK
     
Dec 29, 2008 11:46 |  #304

kosin wrote in post #6963307 (external link)
Great thread. Thank you OP for starting it and the rest of you to participate and sharing the info :)

I subscribed to Alamy 2 days ago and just passed QC...
Now, I have a simple questions regarding keywording:
Do you use different keywords for "Main keywords" and "Comprehensive keywords" or the same ones?
Is it appropriate to leave "Comprehensive keywords" blank?

You can leave whatever you want blank, but the levels of keywords have a different weighting in searches. Check this link (external link) to show you which are the important boxes to fill out. Most people are amazed that the first box "Caption" carries the least weight.


Anke
1D Mark IV | 16-35L f/2.8 II | 24-70L f/2.8 II | 70-200L f/2.8 II | 50 f/1.4 | 600EX-RT and ST-E3-RT
Join the Official POTN UK South-East Thread | Follow me on Twitter (external link) | Tunbridge Wells (external link) | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gary88
Goldmember
Avatar
4,011 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 333
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
     
Dec 29, 2008 11:48 as a reply to  @ kosin's post |  #305

Alamy has a section on that under Contributor Information

http://www.alamy.com …-photography-captions.asp (external link)

In short, don't put the same keywords in each section. You can leave the comprehensive keywords blank if you want, but in general you should keyword your images as thoroughly and accurately as possible.


www.garyhebdingjr.com (external link)|Flickr  (external link)IGear List|Alamy | (external link)Instagram: @garyhebding

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kosin
Goldmember
Avatar
2,098 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 211
Joined Jun 2007
Location: NJ
     
Dec 29, 2008 12:33 |  #306

thanks Anke and Gary for the response.
I'm just wondering how many keywords are you using per image (let say a landscape)?


Greg Gard
=> www.greggard.com (external link)
follow me on Instagram: https://www.instagram.​com/greggardphoto/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Anke
"that rump shot is just adorable"
UK SE Photographer of the Year 2009
Avatar
30,454 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Royal Tunbridge Wells, UK
     
Dec 29, 2008 12:36 |  #307

kosin wrote in post #6963615 (external link)
thanks Anke and Gary for the response.
I'm just wondering how many keywords are you using per image (let say a landscape)?

You can use as many as the box allows, I use as many as I can think of. Do searches of other similar images to see the words others use.


Anke
1D Mark IV | 16-35L f/2.8 II | 24-70L f/2.8 II | 70-200L f/2.8 II | 50 f/1.4 | 600EX-RT and ST-E3-RT
Join the Official POTN UK South-East Thread | Follow me on Twitter (external link) | Tunbridge Wells (external link) | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kosin
Goldmember
Avatar
2,098 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 211
Joined Jun 2007
Location: NJ
     
Dec 29, 2008 12:50 |  #308

Anke wrote in post #6963629 (external link)
You can use as many as the box allows, I use as many as I can think of. Do searches of other similar images to see the words others use.

from the link you posted before: (If I'm understanding correctly this applies only to Main keywords) "To protect your intellectual property these (keywords) are not visible on the website to others."

I was just asking for approximate number of keywords in general. Do you think that using let say 20 keywords is enough or should I enter more than that?


Greg Gard
=> www.greggard.com (external link)
follow me on Instagram: https://www.instagram.​com/greggardphoto/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Anke
"that rump shot is just adorable"
UK SE Photographer of the Year 2009
Avatar
30,454 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Royal Tunbridge Wells, UK
     
Dec 29, 2008 12:52 |  #309

kosin wrote in post #6963733 (external link)
from the link you posted before: (If I'm understanding correctly this applies only to Main keywords) "To protect your intellectual property these (keywords) are not visible on the website to others."

I was just asking for approximate number of keywords in general. Do you think that using let say 20 keywords is enough or should enter more than that?

Its hard to say, just enter however many you think is appropriate for someone to locate your image. What words first spring to mind when looking at it, perhaps ask your friends/family for some words to get a better variation.


Anke
1D Mark IV | 16-35L f/2.8 II | 24-70L f/2.8 II | 70-200L f/2.8 II | 50 f/1.4 | 600EX-RT and ST-E3-RT
Join the Official POTN UK South-East Thread | Follow me on Twitter (external link) | Tunbridge Wells (external link) | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jfinke
Senior Member
425 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Likes: 71
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Lenexa, KS
     
Dec 29, 2008 21:31 |  #310

Apparently, they don't like shallow DOF. I just got rejected for out of focus. ;)

I am going to have to go searching for photos that have a small aperture.


a6000, 5Dii, 40D, 350D, 430EX, 70-200 f/4L IS, 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS, EF-S 18-55 IS, nifty fifty, Sigma APO 70-300mm f4-5.6 DG Macro, Tokina 11-16, Sony E PZ 16-50mm
flickr (external link)
, 500px (external link), Lightroom CC, Nik Complete, Photoshop CC, onOne 9.5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
photoguy6405
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,399 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 31
Joined Feb 2008
Location: US Midwest
     
Dec 29, 2008 22:55 |  #311

jfinke wrote in post #6966892 (external link)
Apparently, they don't like shallow DOF. I just got rejected for out of focus. ;)

I am going to have to go searching for photos that have a small aperture.

I asked about this on Alamy's forum and promptly got berated for not blindly trusting that their QC would know the difference. I'm still not convinced.


Website: Iowa Landscape Photography (external link) | Blog (external link) | Gear List & Feedback
Equipment For Sale: Canon PowerShot A95

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Anke
"that rump shot is just adorable"
UK SE Photographer of the Year 2009
Avatar
30,454 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Royal Tunbridge Wells, UK
     
Dec 30, 2008 04:03 |  #312

I agree, I've had them before, I even got OOF for a shot on a foggy day :confused: You just have to keep trying and try and get a different QCer the next time.


Anke
1D Mark IV | 16-35L f/2.8 II | 24-70L f/2.8 II | 70-200L f/2.8 II | 50 f/1.4 | 600EX-RT and ST-E3-RT
Join the Official POTN UK South-East Thread | Follow me on Twitter (external link) | Tunbridge Wells (external link) | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Webby
Member
66 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Grantham, England
     
Dec 30, 2008 05:25 as a reply to  @ Anke's post |  #313

If you use "blurred" as a search term on Alamy, you get nearly 16,000 images! This is one of mine,

http://www.alamy.com …ve=1&size=0xFF&​ot=0&adv=0 (external link) (can't get it to display - think its because of the % in the link?)
I think that if it is "obvious" that it is OOF for "artistic" reasons you should be OK. Having looked through the search results though, there are some weird ones!!

Webby


5dMkII, 5d, 50d, 17-40 f4 L, 24-105 f4 L, [COLOR=black]24-70 f2.8L. 70-200 f2.8L , 100-400 L, 100 f2.8 macro, 580EXII, 430EXII, Manfrotto's,Elinchroms and stuff
webbevents.com (external link)
My Alamy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Anke
"that rump shot is just adorable"
UK SE Photographer of the Year 2009
Avatar
30,454 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Royal Tunbridge Wells, UK
     
Dec 30, 2008 05:36 |  #314

Webby wrote in post #6968510 (external link)
If you use "blurred" as a search term on Alamy, you get nearly 16,000 images! This is one of mine,

HERE (external link) (can't get it to display - think its because of the % in the link?)
I think that if it is "obvious" that it is OOF for "artistic" reasons you should be OK. Having looked through the search results though, there are some weird ones!!

Webby

Works for me, amazing how that got through the QCers though :confused: :D


Anke
1D Mark IV | 16-35L f/2.8 II | 24-70L f/2.8 II | 70-200L f/2.8 II | 50 f/1.4 | 600EX-RT and ST-E3-RT
Join the Official POTN UK South-East Thread | Follow me on Twitter (external link) | Tunbridge Wells (external link) | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
photoguy6405
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,399 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 31
Joined Feb 2008
Location: US Midwest
     
Dec 30, 2008 10:08 |  #315

They do check every image on an initial submission, but only spot check after that. If you feel their reason was questionable, you could rename and resubmit a photo mixed with with a bunch of new stuff. I haven't tried that yet, but intend to at some point.

Based on my experience I suspect, but have no proof, that they are prone to check every first image in a submittal, then at random after that. I rename my images in sequential order for Alamy specifically so I can more easily identify them, so I've started making sure each first image is plain and simple and easy to pass.


Website: Iowa Landscape Photography (external link) | Blog (external link) | Gear List & Feedback
Equipment For Sale: Canon PowerShot A95

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

184,827 views & 0 likes for this thread, 161 members have posted to it and it is followed by 3 members.
Woo hoo Alamy!
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1832 guests, 117 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.