Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
Thread started 27 Aug 2008 (Wednesday) 12:42
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Woo hoo Alamy!

 
roszell
Senior Member
Avatar
966 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 13
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Lafayette, LA
     
Jul 21, 2009 10:25 |  #781

Do you guys always go back to the original RAW when creating images to submit, or does it matter? For example, should I go back to the original RAW file, redo post-processing instead of upscaling a PSD that has been reduced to 8x10 250ppi? Guess I shouldn't be saving PSDs after resizing them for output. :(


R6 Mark II35L 70-200 2.8L IS II580EX II1.4x extender IIIRF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USMRF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Roy ­ Mathers
I am Spartacus!
Avatar
43,850 posts
Likes: 2915
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
     
Jul 21, 2009 10:43 |  #782

I think the best practice is to use the original RAW images.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
roszell
Senior Member
Avatar
966 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 13
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Lafayette, LA
     
Jul 21, 2009 10:47 |  #783

Roy Mathers wrote in post #8318202 (external link)
I think the best practice is to use the original RAW images.

Yeah, that's what I figured. Thanks.


R6 Mark II35L 70-200 2.8L IS II580EX II1.4x extender IIIRF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USMRF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
adam ­ LC
Goldmember
Avatar
2,142 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Greenhithe, Kent. U.K
     
Jul 22, 2009 02:34 |  #784

I've only got 167 images.... really need to work harder on that now. Since last September I've had 1,672 views; 11 zooms.... no sales ,lol.


EOS 6D, 135L, 24-105L, Mamiya RZ67pro2 and lenses :cool:
If you saw a man drowning and could either save him or take a picture...
What kind of film would you use? - Anonymous

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hollis_f
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,649 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 85
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Sussex, UK
     
Jul 22, 2009 02:56 |  #785

adam LC wrote in post #8322780 (external link)
I've only got 167 images.... really need to work harder on that now. Since last September I've had 1,672 views; 11 zooms.... no sales ,lol.

That's a CTR (Click-Through Rating) of 0.66, which is quite a way below the average. If it were me I'd be looking at my keywording. A low CTR implies that potential purchasers are seeing your images after a search, but deciding that they don't really match what they're looking for.

While having a lot of keywords for an image does mean that it comes up in a lot of searches, having keywords that aren't strictly relevant means that they're not going to get zoomed. That results in a low CTR, which will contribute to a low Alamy Ranking, which means that your images come lower down the list in any search.


Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he'll complain about the withdrawal of his free fish entitlement.
Gear Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
adam ­ LC
Goldmember
Avatar
2,142 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Greenhithe, Kent. U.K
     
Jul 22, 2009 03:02 |  #786

hollis_f wrote in post #8322820 (external link)
That's a CTR (Click-Through Rating) of 0.66, which is quite a way below the average. If it were me I'd be looking at my keywording. A low CTR implies that potential purchasers are seeing your images after a search, but deciding that they don't really match what they're looking for.

While having a lot of keywords for an image does mean that it comes up in a lot of searches, having keywords that aren't strictly relevant means that they're not going to get zoomed. That results in a low CTR, which will contribute to a low Alamy Ranking, which means that your images come lower down the list in any search.

I am in the process of editing all keywords, however, I've always tried to keep them relevant to the picture and not just bombard the keyword fields with the high hitting words. I put it down to the fact that I have limited photos and imagination :lol: also that I've probably taken the same shots as everyone else ;)

But noted anyway and working on it!


EOS 6D, 135L, 24-105L, Mamiya RZ67pro2 and lenses :cool:
If you saw a man drowning and could either save him or take a picture...
What kind of film would you use? - Anonymous

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
roszell
Senior Member
Avatar
966 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 13
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Lafayette, LA
     
Jul 22, 2009 07:41 |  #787

OK so last night I went back and re-processed the RAW images and upscaled them for Alamy. I submitted 5 accidently and 4 of them passed, one failing due to camera shake which I thought it might. When I go to "Manage Images v2.1" I see the 4 that passed ready to be tagged.

I am in?

Also, my images are now "ready." Do they automatically go on sale after this?


R6 Mark II35L 70-200 2.8L IS II580EX II1.4x extender IIIRF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USMRF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AzzKicker
Goldmember
Avatar
1,107 posts
Likes: 69
Joined Jul 2003
Location: Rio Grande Valley, Texas
     
Jul 22, 2009 09:35 |  #788

RacingThoughts wrote in post #8323487 (external link)
Also, my images are now "ready." Do they automatically go on sale after this?

Usually takes around 12 hours to go from Ready to On Sale. I just got in yesterday as well and keyworded right away and just this morning they were on Sale already. Also, all my images now are getting passed very quickly in under 12 hours.


Ruben D. Zamora
Canon 6D Mark II, Canon 20-35L,Genesis 200 Strobe

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
roszell
Senior Member
Avatar
966 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 13
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Lafayette, LA
     
Jul 22, 2009 09:37 |  #789

AzzKicker wrote in post #8323974 (external link)
Usually takes around 12 hours to go from Ready to On Sale. I just got in yesterday as well and keyworded right away and just this morning they were on Sale already. Also, all my images now are getting passed very quickly in under 12 hours.

Sweet, thanks! Guess I am officially in.


R6 Mark II35L 70-200 2.8L IS II580EX II1.4x extender IIIRF100-400mm F5.6-8 IS USMRF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AzzKicker
Goldmember
Avatar
1,107 posts
Likes: 69
Joined Jul 2003
Location: Rio Grande Valley, Texas
     
Jul 22, 2009 09:46 |  #790

I have a quick question on MODEL RELEASES. I'm noticing a lot of images have people in them with clear visible faces and yet are labeled as Licenses and NOT having a model release. I thought those had to be editorial if they didn't have a model release? I have a bunch of images of Firefighter trainings that I wanted to put on there but I dont have model releases.


Ruben D. Zamora
Canon 6D Mark II, Canon 20-35L,Genesis 200 Strobe

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hollis_f
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,649 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 85
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Sussex, UK
     
Jul 22, 2009 09:58 |  #791

AzzKicker wrote in post #8324019 (external link)
I have a quick question on MODEL RELEASES. I'm noticing a lot of images have people in them with clear visible faces and yet are labeled as Licenses and NOT having a model release. I thought those had to be editorial if they didn't have a model release? I have a bunch of images of Firefighter trainings that I wanted to put on there but I dont have model releases.

That's correct, no releases means it can be used for editorial only. Licensed images with no releases will be marked as such. It's only Royalty Free that requires a release.

Here's Alamy's guidelines -

to avoid legal issues you must never set a licence as RF (but only as L with restrictions set for “Editorial use only”), if it:

* contains people or domestic buildings without releases.
* solely features a logo, trademark or copyrighted building - this is a copyright or trademark infringement. Note, images where the logo, trademark or copyrighted building is incidental (e.g. it’s visible but isn’t the central focus) can be submitted as Royalty Free.


Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he'll complain about the withdrawal of his free fish entitlement.
Gear Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
asty80
Senior Member
Avatar
591 posts
Likes: 54
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Pune, India via Bear, DE, US
     
Jul 25, 2009 17:24 |  #792

Hello..trying to upload my first batch - but got the following error:
"Uncompressed size less than 48 MB"

I'm doing the following:
1) Saving my RAW file as a TIFF
2) The size of the TIF file is around 57MB
3) Changing the mode to 8 bit and saving the file as a JPG.
4) Size of the JPG is around 5Mb

Not sure what is wrong here (if anything is right !) :(

Need advice!! thanks!


Canon 5D Mark iii, Canon 40D
24-105mm f/4 L IS, Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8, 50mm f/1.8, 100-400L, 100mm macro, 430ex ii, SLIK 700DX tripod
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/shyamyag (external link)
:)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
photoguy6405
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,399 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 31
Joined Feb 2008
Location: US Midwest
     
Jul 25, 2009 17:38 |  #793

asty80 wrote in post #8342641 (external link)
Hello..trying to upload my first batch - but got the following error:
"Uncompressed size less than 48 MB"

I'm doing the following:
1) Saving my RAW file as a TIFF
2) The size of the TIF file is around 57MB
3) Changing the mode to 8 bit and saving the file as a JPG.
4) Size of the JPG is around 5Mb

Not sure what is wrong here (if anything is right !) :(

Need advice!! thanks!

If your tiff is 57MB (16 bit) when opened, then converting to 8 bit cuts that in half to 28.5MB. You need approximately 96MB opened a 16 bit tiff to save down as a 48MB 8 bit (open) jpeg.

You have to upsize the file and there are several explanations already in this thread how to do that.


Website: Iowa Landscape Photography (external link) | Blog (external link) | Gear List & Feedback
Equipment For Sale: Canon PowerShot A95

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rammy
Goldmember
Avatar
3,189 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Oct 2004
Location: London, England
     
Jul 25, 2009 18:24 |  #794

asty80 wrote in post #8342641 (external link)
Hello..trying to upload my first batch - but got the following error:
"Uncompressed size less than 48 MB"

I'm doing the following:
1) Saving my RAW file as a TIFF
2) The size of the TIF file is around 57MB
3) Changing the mode to 8 bit and saving the file as a JPG.
4) Size of the JPG is around 5Mb

Not sure what is wrong here (if anything is right !) :(

Need advice!! thanks!

It's the image memory size when opened, not the file size. The image dimensions has to be atleast 48mb. Go to the Image then Image Size option in photoshop. The Pixel Dimensions at the top of the dialog needs to be atleast 48mb.


Gear | Surrey Wedding Photographer (external link) | Surrey Wedding Photographer Blog (external link) | London Architecture Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
asty80
Senior Member
Avatar
591 posts
Likes: 54
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Pune, India via Bear, DE, US
     
Jul 25, 2009 19:33 |  #795

photoguy6405 wrote in post #8342691 (external link)
If your tiff is 57MB (16 bit) when opened, then converting to 8 bit cuts that in half to 28.5MB. You need approximately 96MB opened a 16 bit tiff to save down as a 48MB 8 bit (open) jpeg.

You have to upsize the file and there are several explanations already in this thread how to do that.

rammy wrote in post #8342819 (external link)
It's the image memory size when opened, not the file size. The image dimensions has to be atleast 48mb. Go to the Image then Image Size option in photoshop. The Pixel Dimensions at the top of the dialog needs to be atleast 48mb.

Thanks for the quick help guys! I was able to change it in the suggested way and upload the snaps! :D
Now waiting for a reply :neutral:


Canon 5D Mark iii, Canon 40D
24-105mm f/4 L IS, Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8, 50mm f/1.8, 100-400L, 100mm macro, 430ex ii, SLIK 700DX tripod
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/shyamyag (external link)
:)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

184,828 views & 0 likes for this thread, 161 members have posted to it and it is followed by 3 members.
Woo hoo Alamy!
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1832 guests, 117 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.