Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 29 Aug 2008 (Friday) 11:24
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Need help deciding which wide angle lens

 
photo9999
Member
78 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Location: San Diego CA
     
Aug 29, 2008 11:24 |  #1

OK, here's the dilemma. My wife does wedding photography on the side for friends and family. I come along as an assistant when she needs help. We currently have a 5D with the 24-70L and 70-200L 2.8IS. We just got a 30D for a second body. Now we've been deciding on getting an ultra wide angle lens. I was leaning toward the 17-40L but if we use it on the 30D, the FL will be 27-64. Now if we get the Canon 10-22, we can't use it on the 5D. The 16-35L is out of our budget, any suggestions would be appreciated.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
egordon99
Cream of the Crop
10,247 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philly 'burbs
     
Aug 29, 2008 11:34 |  #2

Only way to get "ultra wide angle" that would work on both bodies is the Sigma 12-24mm. It's W--------I---------D-----------E on the 5D and just W---I---D---E on the 30D.

If it was me (and hey, it is me!), I'd get the Sigma 10-20mm. A bit cheaper than the Canon 10-22mm and every bit as good (ducks/puts on flame suit :lol: )




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
12mnkys
Senior Member
Avatar
709 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: Somewhere between the Land of Calm and Insanity...
     
Aug 29, 2008 11:40 |  #3

i have and LOVE the Sigma 10-20....

No flames from where I sit!


Panasonic Lumix GX-1 | Panasonic 12-35 f/2.8 O.I.S. | Panasonic 40 f/1.7

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
photo9999
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
78 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Location: San Diego CA
     
Aug 29, 2008 15:09 |  #4

I'll take a look into the sigma 10-20, thanks.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Esquire08
Senior Member
251 posts
Joined Jul 2008
     
Aug 29, 2008 15:37 |  #5

17-40L is my choice on my 40D. The distortion is minimal at 17mm and is non-existent past 24mm.

With a 10-2x, you're going to get very distorted pictures at the wide end. Just keep that in mind.

I would suggest going with the 17-40L and keeping it on your 30D then switching it to the 5D when you want really wide.


6D | Samyang 14 ƒ/2.8 | 24-70 ƒ/4L IS | Feisol 3301 + Markins M10

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TaDa
...as cool as Perry
Avatar
6,742 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2008
Location: New York
     
Aug 29, 2008 15:40 |  #6

I doubt that the Canon 10-22 would be fast enough for wedding shots indoor unless you had good lighting. Tokina 11-16 f/2.8 would be great on the 30 indoors


Name is Peter and here is my gear:
Canon 5D II, Canon 7D, Canon 40D
Glass - Zeiss 21 f/2.8 ZE, Canon 35 f/1.4L, Canon 40 f/2.8 STM, Canon 24-70 f/2.8
L, Canon 85 f/1.2L II, Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, Canon 500 f/4L IS
Speedlite 580ex II, 430ex - Gitzo GT-3541XLS w/ Arca B1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
S-S
frustrating simple something
Avatar
8,755 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2006
     
Aug 29, 2008 15:44 |  #7

i have and use the canon 10-22 indoors at weddings... see sample pic (handheld)
i had previously borrowed a sigma 10-20.. i prefer the canon but the difference is marginal
quality is nice and does the job

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TaDa
...as cool as Perry
Avatar
6,742 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2008
Location: New York
     
Aug 29, 2008 15:46 |  #8

somethingsimple wrote in post #6205236 (external link)
i have and use the 10-22 indoors at weddings... see sample pic
quality is nice and does the job

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

That picture right there is exactly what I'm talking about. Look at the lighting in that room. You have the heavy duty fixtures pumping out additional light over the decorative lighting. That's a situation of "good" lighting. My photographers almost killed me because the reception hall was mainly lit by candles :)


Name is Peter and here is my gear:
Canon 5D II, Canon 7D, Canon 40D
Glass - Zeiss 21 f/2.8 ZE, Canon 35 f/1.4L, Canon 40 f/2.8 STM, Canon 24-70 f/2.8
L, Canon 85 f/1.2L II, Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, Canon 500 f/4L IS
Speedlite 580ex II, 430ex - Gitzo GT-3541XLS w/ Arca B1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
adam8080
Goldmember
Avatar
2,280 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
     
Aug 29, 2008 16:01 |  #9

There aren't many times I need my 10-22 at weddings, but it has always been fast enough for me when I needed it. You can shoot slower with it without getting noticeable motion blur because the people are smaller in the frame. The Canon 10-22 is faster than the Sigma, and has a larger range.

For the OP either the 12-24 to work with both, or the 17-40 (if you want real wide shots put it on the 5D).


Huntsville Real Estate Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
i ­ love ­ snowboarding
Member
Avatar
63 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: LA, CA
     
Aug 29, 2008 16:14 |  #10

Have you considered the Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8?
It's "faster" than the other UWAs out there, perfect for wide angle indoor shooting...


* Canon 40D | Canon 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS | Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 | Sigma 30mm f/1.4
* Canon Speedlite 580EX II
* Canon SD870 IS [wide angle p&s]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mr_J
Member
Avatar
47 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: San Francisco
     
Aug 29, 2008 16:25 |  #11

I have used, not at weddings mind you, and have been told by many a photographer, that the Tokina 11-16 is hard to beat...if you can get it.


Mr_J-http://www.flickr.com/​photos/blackdogphotos/
Canon 40D, Tamron 17-50 f2.8, 50mm f1.8, Canon 70-200 f2.8L, Canon S5IS
Diana+ 120mm
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/blackdogphotos/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
adam8080
Goldmember
Avatar
2,280 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
     
Aug 29, 2008 16:29 |  #12

The bad thing about that lens is that if something happens to the 40D, then you are out a wide angle lens. If you have a 17-40 and something happens to the 5D, then you are out a wide angle too, but you still have a backup for a normal lens on the 40D if something happens to the 24-70.


Huntsville Real Estate Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
photo9999
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
78 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Location: San Diego CA
     
Aug 29, 2008 16:48 |  #13

adam8080 wrote in post #6205468 (external link)
The bad thing about that lens is that if something happens to the 40D, then you are out a wide angle lens. If you have a 17-40 and something happens to the 5D, then you are out a wide angle too, but you still have a backup for a normal lens on the 40D if something happens to the 24-70.

Well we actually have a Rebel XT, it was our first DSLR, so its actually a backup for a back up. :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
adam8080
Goldmember
Avatar
2,280 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
     
Aug 29, 2008 17:14 |  #14

Oh, ok! I'd probably say got for the 11-16 then. lol


Huntsville Real Estate Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BLEITH1965
Senior Member
Avatar
465 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Feb 2007
     
Aug 29, 2008 17:24 |  #15

egordon99 wrote in post #6203876 (external link)
Only way to get "ultra wide angle" that would work on both bodies is the Sigma 12-24mm. It's W--------I---------D-----------E on the 5D and just W---I---D---E on the 30D.

If it was me (and hey, it is me!), I'd get the Sigma 10-20mm. A bit cheaper than the Canon 10-22mm and every bit as good (ducks/puts on flame suit :lol: )

I bought the SIGMA 12 24mm also because I have the 5D and 30D combination and wanted wide for both cameras and I didn't care about the f4.5-5.6 speed because my other lenses are f2.8 and less. :lol::lol::lol:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,720 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Need help deciding which wide angle lens
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is josetide
1048 guests, 171 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.