Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
Thread started 31 Aug 2008 (Sunday) 08:27
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Small Flash, big portrait

 
stinky
Senior Member
Avatar
284 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 22
Joined Sep 2006
     
Aug 31, 2008 08:27 |  #1

I'm really liking this small off-camera flash stuff I'm learning on the strobist site. Flash mounted off camera, to the right and a couple feet higher than the camera. Exposed for the sky, fill light with the flash.

IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3021/2812057641_4511c2c2d6.jpg

My Flickr
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/backyardcritter​s/ (external link)
500px.com
http://500px.com/stink​y (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
710 ­ Studio
Goldmember
Avatar
1,788 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 107
Joined May 2008
Location: Grand Haven, Michigan
     
Aug 31, 2008 08:50 |  #2

I think the entire photo needs to be brighter... it seems very underexposed.

With that taken care of, I love the perspective... makes him look 8-feet tall!


=--My Gear List --=
Find me at:
Website (external link)| Flickr (external link)| DeviantArt (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Darvon
Senior Member
Avatar
640 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Dec 2005
Location: San Francisco, California
     
Aug 31, 2008 11:31 |  #3

I would agree with above post that the photo needs to be brighter. Perhaps when you get your exposure setting for the sky, you should adjust the exposure compensation setting so that the brightest area is one or two "hashes" below the +2 on the light meter. If you meter on the sky and take those readings, your camera will try to make that at 50% (gray). That will cause the background to be darker than necessary as it is here.


My Flickr (external link)
DonnellyImages.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
christyjo2
Goldmember
2,275 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Arkansas
     
Aug 31, 2008 13:34 |  #4

The photo does need to be brighter...but...i love the photo!


*Christy* "If at first you dont succeed...destroy all evidence that you tried." www.christyfullerphoto​graphy.info (external link)
Canon 50D w/battery grip, Canon T1i (500D) w/battery grip, Xti, 270ex speedlite, Bower Flash. Canon 28-135mm w/IS, Kit Lens w/IS, Canon 17-85 w/IS, Canon 35-70mm, Nifty Fifty, Tamron 28-80mm, 75-300mm, 3-AB flash units.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lovingbliss
Member
207 posts
Joined Jun 2007
     
Aug 31, 2008 16:31 |  #5

Definitely needs to be brighter. Could be great with some post processing.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lkrms
"stupidly long verbal diarrhoea"
Avatar
4,558 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Newcastle, Australia
     
Aug 31, 2008 16:37 |  #6

To be more specific than my learned friends (edit: except Darvon :oops:), I think your ambient exposure is too low relative to your flash exposure. Perhaps this was an artistic decision (if so, it should be processed accordingly, i.e. with more drama), but usually it's just a mistake (and it's one I still make sometimes too). Also, having the flash higher would do wonders for the long ugly shadow behind him.

Light placement should be about creating desirable shadows. I find this hard too, especially when working on location with limited grip equipment ...


Luke
Headshot photographer Sydney and Newcastle (external link) | Twitter (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stinky
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
284 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 22
Joined Sep 2006
     
Aug 31, 2008 18:08 as a reply to  @ lkrms's post |  #7

Damn, just when I thought I had it all figured out, I get all this constructive criticism. ;)

Thanks for the tips everybody. Back to the camera to nail this down...


My Flickr
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/backyardcritter​s/ (external link)
500px.com
http://500px.com/stink​y (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pprice
Goldmember
Avatar
1,714 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Gods Country (aka Mississippi)
     
Aug 31, 2008 18:41 |  #8

easy to fix in PP!!

Cool shot.


1D MKIII 16-35 2.8L MKII 24-70 2.8L 70-200 2.8L [COLOR=black]IS 300 2.8L IS (few others) Bunch of AB lighting
Southern by the grace of God

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pprice
Goldmember
Avatar
1,714 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Gods Country (aka Mississippi)
     
Aug 31, 2008 18:43 |  #9

Somthing else I just thought of, if the flash was a little bit lower, would it not make the shadow better?

I am not good with a flash yet, so I dont really know, just something I see in the picture that looks unnatural a little.


1D MKIII 16-35 2.8L MKII 24-70 2.8L 70-200 2.8L [COLOR=black]IS 300 2.8L IS (few others) Bunch of AB lighting
Southern by the grace of God

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Darvon
Senior Member
Avatar
640 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Dec 2005
Location: San Francisco, California
     
Aug 31, 2008 21:39 |  #10

pprice wrote in post #6215813 (external link)
easy to fix in PP!!

Cool shot.

pprice, it may not be as easy to fix in pp as you'd think. By trying to lighten shadows, often you add a lot of noise or grain and lose contrast within the shadows. It creates a lot of undesirable effects. Best to get the shot the way you want it exposed in the first place, then simply do minor touch-ups in pp. The other thing to consider, if you are going to make a mistake of under or over exposing a shot, it's best to overexpose (I'm not talking about blowing a picture out, I'm simply talking about overexposure, but maintaining the data still within the histogram) due to the amount of information within the lighter scale of recorded data. You never pick up noise by darkening a photo, whereas the opposite is not true.


My Flickr (external link)
DonnellyImages.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,801 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Small Flash, big portrait
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
794 guests, 169 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.