Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 04 Sep 2008 (Thursday) 05:53
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

UK: Tripod/Ball Head Combination Recommendations?

 
tuttifrutti
Senior Member
619 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 460
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Aldershot, Hampshire UK
     
Sep 04, 2008 05:53 |  #1

Hi folks,

I'm just starting out with my new Canon 40D being ordered next week.
I've seen plenty of threads about ball heads and I can see the obvious benefits of having one over a normal tripod set up.

So, can anyone out there in the UK recommend me a very good Tripod/Ball Head combination that will fold away nicely and keep my set up solid and my camera safe.

I am on as strict a budget as is possible after my initial outlay so any thoughts would really be appreciated.

Kind regards

Ian


Hello...
My name's Ian and i'm a photography junkie :rolleyes:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Suller
Member
70 posts
Joined Jan 2008
     
Sep 04, 2008 07:22 |  #2

Have a look at this link http://www.bythom.com/​support.htm (external link) intersting read.
Also remember to only but what you are happy carrying.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Anke
"that rump shot is just adorable"
UK SE Photographer of the Year 2009
Avatar
30,454 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Royal Tunbridge Wells, UK
     
Sep 04, 2008 07:29 |  #3

Don't think you can go far wrong with an Manfrotto 055XPROB and 488RC2.


Anke
1D Mark IV | 16-35L f/2.8 II | 24-70L f/2.8 II | 70-200L f/2.8 II | 50 f/1.4 | 600EX-RT and ST-E3-RT
Join the Official POTN UK South-East Thread | Follow me on Twitter (external link) | Tunbridge Wells (external link) | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
irispatch
Goldmember
Avatar
1,009 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Maryland
     
Sep 04, 2008 07:54 as a reply to  @ Anke's post |  #4

I know it is hard to think about spending a lot but I think many of us have found that they end up spending more because the first purchase turned out to be less than good. The old saying spend it now or spend it later is very true. Because spend $100 now you may well end up spending $200 in a year or two and maybe more again after that. Research a lot before you buy read multiple review forums before you spend. I started out with a cheap head supposed to hold 3 times what my outfit weighed.... nope it drifted leaving me with less than ideal shots. I started to look for something moderate priced but after reviewing a lot I finally bit the bullet and ordered a Markins Q3 I am very happy now.

Best to look toward something that takes an easily found quick release plate, too many heads will only accept one kind of plate and once you start adding lenses to your kit you suddenly find that you need different lens plates and a new head to accomidate them. Best to stay with something that accepts ARCA quick release plates, there are a lot in a wide price range.


Canon 50D, Canon 100mm f/2.8 IS L, Canon 20-35mm f/2.8L, Canon 70-300 f/4-5.6 L IS and Kenko 1.4 TC :lol:
Gitzo G2228 with a Markins Q3, and assorted gadgets. :)
The Iris Patch

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tuttifrutti
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
619 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 460
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Aldershot, Hampshire UK
     
Sep 04, 2008 08:59 |  #5

I know what you are saying guys, i'm just really struggling with the concept of spending a fortune (well to me anyway) on camera gear and then having to spend the price of a lens on a tripod :confused:

Maybe I can away with my cheapo tripod for a few months until Christmas. Blimey, I need to look round the house for stuff to sell when the wife's back is turned :cool:


Hello...
My name's Ian and i'm a photography junkie :rolleyes:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ben_r_
-POTN's Three legged Support-
Avatar
15,894 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Sep 04, 2008 09:13 |  #6

irispatch wrote in post #6238809 (external link)
I know it is hard to think about spending a lot but I think many of us have found that they end up spending more because the first purchase turned out to be less than good. The old saying spend it now or spend it later is very true. Because spend $100 now you may well end up spending $200 in a year or two and maybe more again after that. Research a lot before you buy read multiple review forums before you spend. I started out with a cheap head supposed to hold 3 times what my outfit weighed.... nope it drifted leaving me with less than ideal shots. I started to look for something moderate priced but after reviewing a lot I finally bit the bullet and ordered a Markins Q3 I am very happy now.

Best to look toward something that takes an easily found quick release plate, too many heads will only accept one kind of plate and once you start adding lenses to your kit you suddenly find that you need different lens plates and a new head to accomidate them. Best to stay with something that accepts ARCA quick release plates, there are a lot in a wide price range.

This is very true! Has happened this way for me every step of the way! Now Im to the point where I either buy nice stuff in the first place or dont buy and wait until I can afford the nicer version. Otherwise Im just not satisfied always wishing I would have gotten then upgrade or the one with more features, or whatever.


[Gear List | Flickr (external link) | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection (external link) /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Sep 04, 2008 09:18 |  #7

tuttifrutti wrote in post #6239143 (external link)
and then having to spend the price of a lens on a tripod

Think about it this way: The tripod will improve the IQ of all your shots ;)
Also, the difference between a good and a crappy one will probably matter more then the difference between a kit lens and an L in some circumstances.


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tuttifrutti
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
619 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 460
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Aldershot, Hampshire UK
     
Sep 05, 2008 03:12 as a reply to  @ René Damkot's post |  #8

OK guys, i've been giving this a lot of thought and realise that it's the way forward. So, to bump back to the top if you don't mind i'm after a few more recommendations to give me a selection to look at.

I'm totally naive at this stage and only know that I'll be putting my camera on it and it really should be a ball head set up. I've also seen a few threads discussing either twist lock or snap lock. I think i'm swaying towards twist lock.

So, can anyone please recommend me some full set ups in the UK. At tops, my weight of camera and lens will probably be the Canon 40D & Canon 70-200mm F4L lens.

I'm assuming these tripods are also pretty heavy as just thinking about that little lot hanging to one side in portrait mode scares me :confused:

Thanks in advance

Ian


Hello...
My name's Ian and i'm a photography junkie :rolleyes:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Sep 05, 2008 03:31 |  #9

tuttifrutti wrote in post #6245004 (external link)
just thinking about that little lot hanging to one side in portrait mode scares me

You could get a tripod ring for your 70-200 ;)


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tuttifrutti
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
619 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 460
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Aldershot, Hampshire UK
     
Sep 05, 2008 03:41 |  #10

René Damkot wrote in post #6245055 (external link)
You could get a tripod ring for your 70-200 ;)

Oh Rene, why did you go say that :cool: Now i'm even more confused :confused:


Hello...
My name's Ian and i'm a photography junkie :rolleyes:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Suller
Member
70 posts
Joined Jan 2008
     
Sep 05, 2008 07:02 as a reply to  @ tuttifrutti's post |  #11

The tripod ring fits around and clamps your lens, it has a foot on the bottom with tripod connection that should be at the camera/lens centre of gravity.

Another benefit is the lens can be clamped in any rotational position so you can use the lens in portrait orientation, loosen the clamp spin the lens/camera to landscape, retighten and you are done without effecting the balance.

There appers to be alot of opinion about whether this is required on a 70-200 f4 but I suppose it depends on how strurdy your tripod and head is.

The tripod rings come in a few different sizes so make sure you get the right one. Also the Canon ones are pretty expensive, there are cheap versions on E-bay which some people use happily but have a good investigation before deciding not to go with Canon.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gembobs
Member
215 posts
Likes: 6
Joined May 2008
Location: UK
     
Sep 05, 2008 08:01 |  #12

Ian, I have the manfrotto 190XPROB with 486RC2 ball head. I love it, and not had any problems with it. I chose the 190 over the 055 as it is smaller and I want / need to travel with mine so didn't want something that I may think twice about carrying.

www.manfrotto.com (external link) lists all the specs of each tripod and head, just remember that to work out the maximum load for the tripod you need to minus the weight of the head first.

If possible get down to your local shop and have a play with what they have there as you will soon find out what you like and what you don't. I found Jacobs and London Camera Exchange had a better range on show than Jessops, though other shops will also stock them.


Gear List
My Smugmug (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tuttifrutti
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
619 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 460
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Aldershot, Hampshire UK
     
Sep 05, 2008 08:10 |  #13

gembobs wrote in post #6245770 (external link)
Ian, I have the manfrotto 190XPROB with 486RC2 ball head. .

That's excellent news. I found an old thread where someone else in the UK had also got this combination and i've pm'd him for his thoughts a bit further down the line.

How do you find yours - I see you've got a few big lens... how does the 75-300mm sit on yours in portrait mode. Any slippage or does it all lock up tight. I just look at all of these and feel that if I change to portrait mode it will all just tip over. Obviously it doesnt but it would be nice to bombard you with questions before I spend out all that money....

Thanks again

Ian


Hello...
My name's Ian and i'm a photography junkie :rolleyes:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RPCrowe
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,331 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 2522
Joined Nov 2005
Location: San Diego County, California, USA
     
Sep 05, 2008 13:38 as a reply to  @ tuttifrutti's post |  #14

You don't need to spend hundreds...

A used Manfrotto 3001 Pro or Bpro is a very viable tripod which will sell for well under $100 on eBay in the USA (often around $50 which is what I paid for my model). I am not sure what the shipping or import taxes (if any would be).

This is not the ultimate tripod but it is a very usable one. It is not a tall tripod (116.1 cm without center column raised). It is not the lightest tripod at 1.74 kg but, it is a pretty solid set of legs with a recommended max carrying weight of 5 kg.

The center column reverses and can be mounted under the apex of the tripod for low shots.

I have used this tripod for a couple of years and replaced it with the taller, sturdier and much more expensive Giottos MT-8180.

I would try to get a ball head which has an Arca Compatible quick release so you can use a really Right Stuff L-bracket to mount your camera/lens. Here are the advantages of the RRS L-bracket:

http://reallyrightstuf​f.com/QR/05.html (external link)


See my images at http://rpcrowe.smugmug​.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tuttifrutti
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
619 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 460
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Aldershot, Hampshire UK
     
Sep 05, 2008 15:17 |  #15

RPCrowe wrote in post #6247867 (external link)
I would try to get a ball head which has an Arca Compatible quick release so you can use a really Right Stuff L-bracket to mount your camera/lens. Here are the advantages of the RRS L-bracket:

Now that is a nice bit of kit. Shame about the price - I may have to reign myself in a bit for the moment but that's going on my wish list... thanks for that ;)

If I were to buy my ball head how would I know if it's Arca compatible. Would the shop know (I guess so) as I wouldn't want to have to buy it twice right now


Hello...
My name's Ian and i'm a photography junkie :rolleyes:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,848 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
UK: Tripod/Ball Head Combination Recommendations?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2705 guests, 147 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.