Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
Thread started 05 Sep 2008 (Friday) 15:12
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Night Football Flash Set-up

 
ChrisK10
Senior Member
Avatar
431 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Folsom, CA
     
Sep 24, 2010 16:30 |  #166

BenJohnson wrote in post #10972186 (external link)
Sure that would result in a much larger angle between the lens and the flash, but the compromise in reach doesn't make much sense for most serious sports shooters

Your right, but you only use the shorter lens to dial in your flash then switch back to your longer lens.


7D gripped / Rebel XS / 70-200 f/2.8 L IS / 50mm f/1.4 / and some other stuff
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BenJohnson
Goldmember
Avatar
1,811 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Minneapolis, MN
     
Sep 24, 2010 16:31 |  #167

ChrisK10 wrote in post #10972192 (external link)
Your right, but you only use the shorter lens to dial in your flash then switch back to your longer lens.

Ah, that makes sense. I'll have to try it.


|Ben Johnson Photography (external link)|
|Gear List|

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChunkyDA
Goldmember
Avatar
3,712 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Likes: 93
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Emerald Coast, FL
     
Sep 24, 2010 23:11 |  #168

int2str wrote in post #10972180 (external link)
With this setup, wouldn't it be near impossible to "aim" the flash? I'm sure "close enough" works here since there's beam spread etc. and the usable focal length will not vary by much, but still, given the offset angle, the aim of the flash would be defined by the subject to camera distance.

See attached image as to what I mean...

Wow, a flash is not a laser. There seems to be enough spread with the 580EX set on 105mm to fill a 200mm or 300mm viewfinder so long as it is pointed forward. To me the most important thing is to get it directly over or under the lens to minimize the shadow on the side of the players.
I also aim the flash up just a bit to not have too much light fall on the grass in front of the players.
These are 2 unfinished examples of the small snippets I give to the school for their football team website. Shown here only so you can see the flash shadows but it is not too distracting by being off axis.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Dave
Support Search and Rescue, Get Lost (external link)
Gear list and some feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BenJohnson
Goldmember
Avatar
1,811 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Minneapolis, MN
     
Sep 24, 2010 23:59 |  #169

ChunkyDA wrote in post #10974025 (external link)
Wow, a flash is not a laser. There seems to be enough spread with the 580EX set on 105mm to fill a 200mm or 300mm viewfinder so long as it is pointed forward.

Yeah, the flash only zooms to 105mm, so you have some room for error if you're shooting at 300mm. I just attempted to point mine straight ahead and didn't seem to have any problems. I didn't do anything special to aim it, just eyeballed it.

Here are my shots from my first night out with the new setup:

https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?​p=10974199

I had a few hiccups with the flash not communicating properly with the body, but overall I liked the shots. I think it is definitely an improvement over ambient. Especially in poorly lit stadiums.


|Ben Johnson Photography (external link)|
|Gear List|

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChunkyDA
Goldmember
Avatar
3,712 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Likes: 93
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Emerald Coast, FL
     
Sep 28, 2010 23:36 |  #170

I did a little test tonight and will post more eventually. Here's the setup description for this example looking at flash spread of the 580EXII:
1DmII on tripod, 580EXII on hotshoe, flash zoom set at 105mm, lens= 300mm 2.8
1/250, f2.8, ISO 500 (my game settings)
second camera is 40D handheld touching the 1DmII on the right side, 17mm, 1 second exposure (to give me enough time to fire the 1DmII).
test subject is shirt and pants hanging on flash stand set exactly 1/2 way across the field. 1DmII is on tripod at shooter's line, approx 4' out of bounds.
Orange cones in the stands mark the upper left and right limits of the 300mm. This is so I can judge the difference when the 70-200mm is mounted for additional testing.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Dave
Support Search and Rescue, Get Lost (external link)
Gear list and some feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AZAlphaDog
Goldmember
Avatar
1,750 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Southwest
     
Sep 29, 2010 01:47 as a reply to  @ ChunkyDA's post |  #171

I tried this and just didn't get the results I thought I should have.

Specs for the first shot:
Shooting Mode Manual Exposure
Tv( Shutter Speed ) 1/500
Av( Aperture Value ) 2.8
Metering Mode Spot Metering
ISO Speed 800
Auto ISO Speed OFF
Lens EF70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM
Focal Length 148.0mm
Image Size 5184x3456
Image Quality RAW
Flash On
Flash Type External E-TTL
E-TTL II flash metering Evaluative flash metering
Flash Exposure Compensation +1
Shutter curtain sync 1st-curtain sync
FE lock OFF
White Balance Mode Auto
AF Mode AI Servo AF
AF area select mode Manual selection

Specs for the second shot are all the same except +2 FEC

It looks like the shutter speed is not fast enough, or did I provide way too much camera shake, either way it's way blurry and somewhat overexposed, now I can drop it in post much better than I can bring it up but I don't what to try next?

Do I need to change to second curtain sync?

Now if I meter and get an exposure for ambient and then drop it 2 stops with ISO will that give me the results I'm looking for?

Or is it the high-speed-sync that is limiting the flash duration?

I thought the flash would stop the action (but that is only on second curtain, right?) so if my shutter speed is 1/250 or 1/320 and adjust everything from there to get the results I need?


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


DOUG JAMES | PHOTO PRODUCTIONS (external link) | FACEBOOK (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BenJohnson
Goldmember
Avatar
1,811 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Minneapolis, MN
     
Sep 29, 2010 05:58 |  #172

ChunkyDA wrote in post #10998242 (external link)
I did a little test tonight and will post more eventually. Here's the setup description for this example looking at flash spread of the 580EXII:
1DmII on tripod, 580EXII on hotshoe, flash zoom set at 105mm, lens= 300mm 2.8
1/250, f2.8, ISO 500 (my game settings)
second camera is 40D handheld touching the 1DmII on the right side, 17mm, 1 second exposure (to give me enough time to fire the 1DmII).
test subject is shirt and pants hanging on flash stand set exactly 1/2 way across the field. 1DmII is on tripod at shooter's line, approx 4' out of bounds.
Orange cones in the stands mark the upper left and right limits of the 300mm. This is so I can judge the difference when the 70-200mm is mounted for additional testing.

Interesting test. I'd be curious to see the same setup with reduced ambient exposure on the 17mm shot (lower ISO?). That would allow us to see how high the flash coverage is going. As it was shot there, it looks like the flash may be aimed a bit low?

AZAlphaDog wrote in post #10998785 (external link)
I tried this and just didn't get the results I thought I should have.

Specs for the first shot:
Shooting Mode Manual Exposure
Tv( Shutter Speed ) 1/500
Av( Aperture Value ) 2.8
Metering Mode Spot Metering
ISO Speed 800

Now if I meter and get an exposure for ambient and then drop it 2 stops with ISO will that give me the results I'm looking for?

Or is it the high-speed-sync that is limiting the flash duration?

I thought the flash would stop the action (but that is only on second curtain, right?) so if my shutter speed is 1/250 or 1/320 and adjust everything from there to get the results I need?

The flash will stop the action, but NOT when you use HSS. Set your shutter speed to 1/250s (max sync speed), and then the flash will fire a single burst of light, and stop the action. In HSS the flash fires as a pulse/strobe, which reduced power and requires higher shutter speeds to stop action.


|Ben Johnson Photography (external link)|
|Gear List|

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
clarence
Goldmember
Avatar
2,204 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2008
Location: Northern VA
     
Sep 29, 2010 08:01 |  #173

BenJohnson wrote in post #10999361 (external link)
The flash will stop the action, but NOT when you use HSS. Set your shutter speed to 1/250s (max sync speed), and then the flash will fire a single burst of light, and stop the action. In HSS the flash fires as a pulse/strobe, which reduced power and requires higher shutter speeds to stop action.

Exactly. HSS pulses your speedlite so that it's on a longer time, but at a much reduced range. So instead of a quick pop of flash, it's more like turning on a lightbulb before you take the picture, then turning it off once you're finished taking the picture.

Here's a good article from Canon...
http://www.canon.co.jp …ork/ettl2/high/​index.html (external link)

I use HSS for fill light when the sun is setting, you still have plenty of light for exposure, but you're getting harsh shadows. But only when your subject is really close... 10'-20' max. It really drains your batteries and you can easily overheat your flash tube.

So IMHO, don't use Tv=1/500". Stick to M with SS=xsync.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


For Sale: 1D, T1i, 800mm, 600mm

5D3, 1D4, 7D, 600/4L, 200/1.8L, Sigmonster 300-800mm, 80-200/2.8L MDP, 28-70/2.8L, 85/1.8, 50/1.4, 12-24mm, (4) 550EXs, (4) WL strobes, PW MiniTT1/FlexTT5s/AC3/A​C9s
LoCo-Photo.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChunkyDA
Goldmember
Avatar
3,712 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Likes: 93
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Emerald Coast, FL
     
Sep 29, 2010 21:13 |  #174

BenJohnson wrote in post #10999361 (external link)
Interesting test. I'd be curious to see the same setup with reduced ambient exposure on the 17mm shot (lower ISO?). That would allow us to see how high the flash coverage is going. As it was shot there, it looks like the flash may be aimed a bit low?

Actually you are seeing the inverse square law in action. Flash is mounted as straight as the hot-shoe allows. The reflected light is falling off as the reflective surface gets farther away. Not much light is hitting the bleachers on the far side of the field. That is why distance to subject is important and I don't use a manual flash setting anymore. Too much of a pain to dial it down (or change f-stop) as the action gets closer to the camera. While some photogs do this, I find it a distraction.
In some of my shots with visible grass in the foreground, I dial in a bit of gradient filter in Lightroom to lower the exposure of the grass.


Dave
Support Search and Rescue, Get Lost (external link)
Gear list and some feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AZAlphaDog
Goldmember
Avatar
1,750 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Southwest
     
Sep 30, 2010 19:57 |  #175

BenJohnson wrote in post #10999361 (external link)
The flash will stop the action, but NOT when you use HSS. Set your shutter speed to 1/250s (max sync speed), and then the flash will fire a single burst of light, and stop the action. In HSS the flash fires as a pulse/strobe, which reduced power and requires higher shutter speeds to stop action.

Funny, today I got an email from MaxPreps reminding us NOT to use high speed sync, those guys must be stalking my online posts.


DOUG JAMES | PHOTO PRODUCTIONS (external link) | FACEBOOK (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dan-o
Goldmember
Avatar
3,539 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2006
Location: So. Cal.
     
Sep 30, 2010 20:06 |  #176

So you were the one responsible for that email. :)


Danny.
DMunsonPhoto (external link)
Cycling Illustrated (external link)
FaceBook Page (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AZAlphaDog
Goldmember
Avatar
1,750 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Southwest
     
Sep 30, 2010 20:51 as a reply to  @ Dan-o's post |  #177

From the looks of the emails that have been coming form Todd lately I'm not the only one struggling with flashed-night-football, but I haven't uploaded any galleries yet because I know they wouldn't pass the quality test.

I really hope I can get it sorted before the season is over (there are only away games for my local team and my secondary has a bi week so no practice this week) bummer for me.:cry:


DOUG JAMES | PHOTO PRODUCTIONS (external link) | FACEBOOK (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
clarence
Goldmember
Avatar
2,204 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2008
Location: Northern VA
     
Sep 30, 2010 21:12 |  #178

Here are some of mine from last night. FWIW these passed MP.

I've been trying to ride closer to ambient to get some of Danny's nice background balance.

M, SS=xsync, 550EX mounted under, ETTL +1/3...

1.

IMAGE: http://loco-photo.com/images/2010-09-29_2008.jpg

2.
IMAGE: http://loco-photo.com/images/2010-09-29_2026.jpg

3.
IMAGE: http://loco-photo.com/images/2010-09-29_2028.jpg

4. Note: this is the far sideline with a single 550EX on ETTL...
IMAGE: http://loco-photo.com/images/2010-09-29_2044.jpg

5. and then turn around and get the sideline... there's no way I could adjust the flash level manually for each shot like some of you guys do...
IMAGE: http://loco-photo.com/images/2010-09-29_2053.jpg

6.
IMAGE: http://loco-photo.com/images/2010-09-29_2058.jpg

7.
IMAGE: http://loco-photo.com/images/2010-09-29_2087.jpg

8. Note the monster shadows from mounting underneath. Kind of a cool effect here. But it can be really annoying if you have a lot of walls in your backgrounds. Last year I used a flash bracket, but this year I'm using a gimbal and the bracket throws off the balance.
IMAGE: http://loco-photo.com/images/2010-09-29_2109.jpg

For Sale: 1D, T1i, 800mm, 600mm

5D3, 1D4, 7D, 600/4L, 200/1.8L, Sigmonster 300-800mm, 80-200/2.8L MDP, 28-70/2.8L, 85/1.8, 50/1.4, 12-24mm, (4) 550EXs, (4) WL strobes, PW MiniTT1/FlexTT5s/AC3/A​C9s
LoCo-Photo.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChrisK10
Senior Member
Avatar
431 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Folsom, CA
     
Sep 30, 2010 21:52 |  #179

Clarence those shots look pretty good. I have only taken test shots w/ the flash mounted under and I didn't like the shadows I got. These look good. I dont see any shadows at all except on the last one.

Nice work


7D gripped / Rebel XS / 70-200 f/2.8 L IS / 50mm f/1.4 / and some other stuff
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BenJohnson
Goldmember
Avatar
1,811 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Minneapolis, MN
     
Oct 01, 2010 06:01 |  #180

The shadows really seem to depend on the background. The bracket I use is a bit cumbersome, but I like avoiding the monster shadows on all of my shots.


|Ben Johnson Photography (external link)|
|Gear List|

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

45,253 views & 1 like for this thread, 46 members have posted to it.
Night Football Flash Set-up
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry
1090 guests, 112 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.