Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 07 Sep 2008 (Sunday) 15:01
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Canon 40D/Lens Questions

 
Sfordphoto
Goldmember
2,564 posts
Joined Feb 2008
     
Sep 07, 2008 18:17 |  #16

Kinder wrote in post #6259745 (external link)
Hello. i am planning to get the Canon 40D, with a Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM (external link). just wondering what the best lenses are for:

1) Sports Photography
2) Portrait Photography
3) Macro Photography

im only a beginner, so im still pretty confused with a lot of things. like the difference between zoom lenses and fix lenses.

for sports i wish to shoot mostly basketball. i'll be going to my first lakers game this year sitting 7th row from the court. which lens would work best with this? i'de also like one that i could shoot concerts with. in both cases, the lighting is extremely dark.

any suggestions?

okay! thanks for any help. :)

my choices
1) 70-200 f/2.8L (IS or non)...though I should mention that this lens will get you in trouble with officials if you don't have a press pass (depends on their rules of course). i was told to put mine away because it was longer than their regulations allowed. you might want to check if you'll be able to use the lens that you want to get at the games you frequent

2) 70-200 f/2.8L IS. I say IS because it'll help indoors, and IS will help you compose more accurately at the longer focal lengths (around 200mm). Cheaper alternative? 85mm f/1.8 (a fixed focal length lens, aka prime lens)

3) nothing beats a dedicated macro...so 60mm f/2.8 or 100mm f/2.8 macro lenses are both good choices. Note that you can only use the 60mm one on crop bodies like the 40D. If you plan to get a full frame camera in the future, the 100mm f/2.8 is a better idea (EF lenses work on crop and full frame, EF-S lenses ONLY work on crop bodies). If you want a cheaper alternative, you can get some extension tubes (not to be confused with teleconverters) to stick between your camera and already existing lenses. This will allow you to put the camera closer to your object than normally allowed by that lens, making your subject larger.


Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mleone
Senior Member
Avatar
788 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Florida
     
Sep 07, 2008 18:23 |  #17

caseyjohnphotography wrote in post #6260556 (external link)
sick love the 2nd shot that at f/4?

can u show me some photos of it on the camera heaps of different angles and in your hands, want to see how large it is etc.. with and without the hood :)

thanks man!

Here is a few for you


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


:D My goodies

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mleone
Senior Member
Avatar
788 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Florida
     
Sep 07, 2008 18:23 |  #18

Two more


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


:D My goodies

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
caseyjohnphotography
Senior Member
Avatar
969 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Sep 07, 2008 18:27 |  #19
bannedPermanent ban

what u mean it can be extended or retracted..


1D Mark III | 17-35 2.8L | 24-70 2.8L | 70-200 2.8L IS| 580EX II | 430EX II | 3 PocketWizard Plus II's

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
caseyjohnphotography
Senior Member
Avatar
969 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Sep 07, 2008 18:28 |  #20
bannedPermanent ban

oh i see there :)
mmm i might save for the 2.8, once i get the 2.8 ill have it forever...


1D Mark III | 17-35 2.8L | 24-70 2.8L | 70-200 2.8L IS| 580EX II | 430EX II | 3 PocketWizard Plus II's

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mleone
Senior Member
Avatar
788 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Florida
     
Sep 07, 2008 18:29 |  #21

caseyjohnphotography wrote in post #6260755 (external link)
what u mean it can be extended or retracted..

The hood can be moved up or down not removed like others.


:D My goodies

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
caseyjohnphotography
Senior Member
Avatar
969 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Sep 07, 2008 18:32 |  #22
bannedPermanent ban

got it :)


1D Mark III | 17-35 2.8L | 24-70 2.8L | 70-200 2.8L IS| 580EX II | 430EX II | 3 PocketWizard Plus II's

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thatkatmat
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,342 posts
Gallery: 41 photos
Likes: 205
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Seattle, don't move here, it's wet and cold
     
Sep 07, 2008 19:21 |  #23

Wait, so you don't want the 300/4 IS because you don't like the hood?
They had some very good points......The 300/2.8IS is HUGE (to me anyways) Although it is the best glass I've shot, it's not much good if you don't feel like lugging it around.
The 300/4 IS is a fantastic lens and a good start to see if the FL works for you


My Flickr (external link)
Stuff
"Never rat on your friends and always keep your mouth shut." -Jimmy Conway
a9, 12-24/4G, 24-70/2.8GM, 100-400GM, 25/2 Batis, 55/1.8ZA, 85 /1.8FE, 85LmkII, 135L...a6300,10-18/4, 16-50PZ, 18-105PZ

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
caseyjohnphotography
Senior Member
Avatar
969 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Sep 07, 2008 20:57 |  #24
bannedPermanent ban

yeah i've shot with my friends 2.8 300mm and i absolutely love it, i love the fact that it is HUGE and heavy, more stable to shoot with, and id rather save the extra and go the 2.8, then have it forever...


1D Mark III | 17-35 2.8L | 24-70 2.8L | 70-200 2.8L IS| 580EX II | 430EX II | 3 PocketWizard Plus II's

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,540 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Likes: 620
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Sep 07, 2008 21:00 |  #25

caseyjohnphotography wrote in post #6261502 (external link)
yeah i've shot with my friends 2.8 300mm and i absolutely love it, i love the fact that it is HUGE and heavy, more stable to shoot with, and id rather save the extra and go the 2.8, then have it forever...

You like bigger and heavier?

I'd shoot everything with a Canon G9 if it wasn't so hugely limited in what it can do vs. what I want to do. There are essentially zero situations where big and heavy are advantageous on their own merits.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
m-bartelt
Senior Member
Avatar
789 posts
Joined Apr 2008
     
Sep 07, 2008 21:16 |  #26

Kinder wrote in post #6259745 (external link)
i'de also like one that i could shoot concerts with. in both cases, the lighting is extremely dark.

You'll want a flash, or a fast prime + flash for extremely dark. The f/2.8 isn't going to do well in darkness with moving objects.


Canon 40D 10-22mm 24-105L 580 EX II
Canon IIIA LTM Serenar 28mm 3.5
Serenar 50mm 1.8
Leica IIIf RD ST LTM Elmar 50mm 3.5
Nikkor 50mm 1.4
Kodak Brownie No 2
:P

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thatkatmat
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,342 posts
Gallery: 41 photos
Likes: 205
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Seattle, don't move here, it's wet and cold
     
Sep 07, 2008 21:24 |  #27

At 16 years old, perhaps a cool hood and big heavy white glass might be "advantageous" Jeffery......CaseyJohn​, I'm not knocking you, I think after seeing your "16yr old photographer" sig, it gave me a better idea of where you might be comming from. Priorities are certainly different for everyone and the 300/2.8IS is a seriously bad a$$ lens....If you got the snap, get it.


My Flickr (external link)
Stuff
"Never rat on your friends and always keep your mouth shut." -Jimmy Conway
a9, 12-24/4G, 24-70/2.8GM, 100-400GM, 25/2 Batis, 55/1.8ZA, 85 /1.8FE, 85LmkII, 135L...a6300,10-18/4, 16-50PZ, 18-105PZ

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
caseyjohnphotography
Senior Member
Avatar
969 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Sep 07, 2008 21:29 |  #28
bannedPermanent ban

yer, well currently working as a photographer for some companys and doing photoshoots here and there and working at woolworths, normally around 10-20 hours a week and holidays ill probs be doing around 38 hours..

id prefer to just save up the extra and get the 2.8 that way i have it
rather then what i did with 70 200 i got the f/4 IS, sold it a week later and got the 2.8!


1D Mark III | 17-35 2.8L | 24-70 2.8L | 70-200 2.8L IS| 580EX II | 430EX II | 3 PocketWizard Plus II's

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sfordphoto
Goldmember
2,564 posts
Joined Feb 2008
     
Sep 07, 2008 21:29 |  #29

caseyjohnphotography wrote in post #6260456 (external link)
Im looking for a 300 f/4 IS, not sure whether to go that cause its nice and cheap or save ages for the 2.8, what you think?

i think you just threadjacked the poor OP. this thread is way off topic


Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
caseyjohnphotography
Senior Member
Avatar
969 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Sep 07, 2008 21:29 |  #30
bannedPermanent ban

JeffreyG wrote in post #6261523 (external link)
You like bigger and heavier?

I'd shoot everything with a Canon G9 if it wasn't so hugely limited in what it can do vs. what I want to do. There are essentially zero situations where big and heavy are advantageous on their own merits.

Disagree x 100
I prefer a heavy peice of equipment as its solid and easier to pan with.


1D Mark III | 17-35 2.8L | 24-70 2.8L | 70-200 2.8L IS| 580EX II | 430EX II | 3 PocketWizard Plus II's

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,630 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Canon 40D/Lens Questions
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2723 guests, 146 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.